similar to: SAMBA v's FTP - Direct and via router

We have a perculiar problem and wonder if anyone can shed some light or advice ? We have a variety of machines running SCO Unix 3 .2v4.2 with samba 1.9.16, we also have an NT 4.0 server, these are all sharing up various sections of their drives. There is a Red Hat Linux running using smbmount to mount all these drives onto a directory tree, the root of this tree is shared up using samba so raher

Can anyone offer any help with improving the following timings :- Using 3 identical PC's one a win 95 client, one an NT 4.0 Server and one a Linux (Redhat 5.0, Kernel 2.0.32) with Samba (1.9.17p4) I get the following results when copying a directory tree up/down, the tree consists of 183 files in 38 directories totalling 8.5Mb. Win95 -> NT 33secs NT -> Win95

I have recently upgraded to Redhat 5.2 and Samba 2.0.3 and now our backup is only going so far (uses smbclient to tar to tape) and reporting no more room on device, I estimate it is hitting the problem at around 5-6Gb - as its a 25Gb tape and has worked fine on older versions of redhat/samba I think the tape is ok. Has any one any ideas or suggestions on what to try ? Many Thanks Ian

I've just installed an HP Jet Direct Network Print Server and configured our SCO 5.0.2 box to print to it. I can send anything to it as long it's from the Unix side. Then I configured Samba to share the printer and tried sending a test page from one of the NT workstations but nothing came out and I could find no error messages in the log files (even at debug level 9)! The log file just

> On Jun 11, 2006, at 8:15 AM, James Harper wrote: > > > Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I changed > > the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something is > > definitely playing up on port 5060. > > > If you are behind a NAT perhaps two SIP devices are both trying to use > 5060? > Packets are getting out,

> James Harper wrote: > > >Additionally, just to satisfy myself that I wasn't going mad I changed > >the port from 5060 to 5070 and now things are working, so something is > >definitely playing up on port 5060. > > > >James > > > > > > > You probably have are behind NAT and your NAT device has a SIP ALG. > Changing the port disables

Salim: I suspect that if you check the timestamp, you'll find that that binding failure is left over from an earlier attempt, before you were properly configured. Your description of you inetd.conf/services setup sounds correct. Your commandline, though, shouldn't work. You name a directory as the source, but don't say to do its contents. However, I would expect an error from

Help, Our server at work is down. The video memory is out. Its an old IBM PC300PL, 6892-12U, running SCO. If anyone happens to a stick of this type memory and would be willing to sell it, please let me know. Below are the requirements for the video memory: The video memory interface is controlled by an S3 TRIO 3D graphics controller. The amount of SGRAM shipped with the video subsystem is 4MB

Hello to all. I have installed asterisk-1.6.2.1 + asterisk-addons-1.6.2.0 (for chan_mobile) + bluez-4.60. Bluetooth Dongle: Canyon CN-BTU4 (0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)) Device Descriptor: bLength 18

I wasn't implying that anyone do anything about it, just that's it a real problem. Unfortunately, most of the crappy sound cards are the ones that ship with your typical PC, so it's just something that people should be aware of. The solution is pretty straightforward -- just resample the audio data in real time using a reference clock. -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc

This is a very real problem though.. I've encountered many sound cards that use different clocks for input and output (even on the same card!) Also, if you open up a sound device on windows at 8kHz, the microphone is often around 8100Hz, while the output is 8000Hz.. I'm not sure if there's a bug somewhere in some of the OS resampling algorithms, but I've seen that on many machines.

Hi folks, just I installed openssh 2.1.1p4 on a sco OpenServer 5.0.5 machine and it works fine. The only problem I have is the X11 forwarding. I have allowed this feature in the /etc/sshd_config and the /etc/ssh_config, respectively and the /usr/bin/X11/xauth program was in the PATH during compilation. As you can see in the logfile the sco system enables the X11 forwarding and sets the DISPLAY

The list rejected the message because of too-large attachments. If anyone else wants the info let me know and I'll send it directly. James > -----Original Message----- > From: James Harper > Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2008 22:30 > To: 'Charles Lepple' > Cc: nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org > Subject: RE: [Nut-upsuser] HP T/R2200 G2 > > > >

James A. Mutter wrote: >Does anyone know of any issues with 2.0.5 and SCO Openserver 5.0.5? A >friend told me that he had "real problems", but couldn't elaborate. >Is there something I should be aware of before I try this? >Thanks, >Jim Hi, As far as I know there are no problems with running Samba on a SCO system, beside the normal Samba configuration problems.

Here is a problem which I hope someone can help me out on. We have three SCO Unix Systems in our office. Two are running samba but the third keeps on giving me core dumps. Here is a breakout of each computer. Computer #1 Acer 1000 Computer running 486/50 CPU Adaptec SCSI Controller SCO ODT 5.0.4 Operating System Samba 2.0.5a - compiled with SCO cc. Computer #2

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

Kathy, Thank you very much! Peter Olson Alcatel-Lucent Member of Technical Staff Services Technologies 1960 Lucent Lane Rm 7G334 Naperville, IL 60566 peterolson@alcatel-lucent.com Phone: 630 979 0573 Mobile: 630 430 6926 -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com Sent:

Denis Caron wrote: >>We seem to be experiencing some problems with Samba 2.0.6 on SCO Unix >>Openserver 5.0.5. >> >>I'm wondering if anybody else is using this version of Samba on SCO. I used >>an older version 3 years ago and rarely had a problem. I just installed this >>version and am experiencing an annoying problem: >> >>We use

I have several SCO UNIX system were I would like to install Samba. Some of these machines are running SCO 5.0.7 which comes with a Samba version 2.2, the other machines running SCO 5.0.6 do not have Samba. I would like to upgrade the Samba to V.3 on the newer machines and to be able to install it on the older systems, but I am unable to find out a download from Samba.org for SCO. Could some one

Donald H. Bennett, Jr. wrote: >Here is a problem which I hope someone can help me out on. We have three >SCO Unix Systems in our office. Two are running samba but the third keeps >on giving me core dumps. Here is a breakout of each computer. [snip...] >Computers 1 and 2 run samba with no problems at all. However, Computer 3 >gives me a core dump when ever I run the SAMBA startup