similar to: Netlogon in Win95 ?

Hi: I am running Samba 1.9.17 at SUN Solaris 2.6 and it works well. After I upgrade Samba 2.0.3 or 2.0.5a, my Excel spreadsheets got trouble. In the Samba log file I got: [1999/08/23 10:45:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(570) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe Anybody has an idea what is the problem? I

Here's a patch to wobbly.c to handle edge snapping with multiple outputs... Also, I tweaked the window edge snapping to include dock window types, to support the case where dock windows may be on the inner edges of multiple monitors (and thus currently ignored as struts in the output workarea setup). I personally think we should include these "inner" struts when calculating the

pls see this logs as well : Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 12:08:21.401618, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report) Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: =============================================================== Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 12:08:21.401904, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:79(fault_report) Jän 05 12:08:21

I could really need some help with this .... -> still problems here Am 2016-01-05 um 12:23 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > pls see this logs as well : > > > Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: [2016/01/05 > 12:08:21.401618, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report) > Jän 05 12:08:21 samba01.customer.at smbd[18809]: >

Hi I am trying to migrate an old printserver from one samba4 (4.8.11 on CentOS-6) server to a newer one (4.11.2 on CentOS-8) using net rpc printer migrate all The migration of queue, forms, securitty, settings works, during the migration of the drivers (net rpc printer migrate drivers)? the command dumps core at the first driver Here a level10 output ???? spoolss_AddPrinterDriver: struct

Hi, i reduced to one reverse dns zone (192.168.x.x.) same error when converting internal to bind_dlz Jan 23 14:55:39 samba01 named[3279]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=local,DC=laurenz,DC=ws Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: starting configure Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:57:50 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > i reduced to one reverse dns zone (192.168.x.x.) same error when > converting internal to bind_dlz > > > Jan 23 14:55:39 samba01 named[3279]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using > driver dlopen > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: started for DN

i only check via dns admin (windows) Am 23.01.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:57:50 +0100 > Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i reduced to one reverse dns zone (192.168.x.x.) same error when >> converting internal to bind_dlz >> >> >> Jan 23 14:55:39 samba01

On 2020-05-02 16:42, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/05/2020 15:07, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: >> Am I wrong to expect that id user and getent group should list me the >> groups the user is part of. >> >> For example wbinfo --group-info=office shows me that user jdoe and >> lgaga are part of the group, but then when doing id jdoe or id lgaga >>

Today a user asked me whether a file on one host can be different on another host. I was busy composing an answer to tell that the /home space on all clients are mounted using NFS from the file server. Any host will therefor see the same file. The user pointed me to his file and I copied this file from the client and compared this with the file on the file server. To my surprise it turned out

On 2020-05-02 20:20, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/05/2020 18:59, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: >> On 2020-05-02 16:42, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 02/05/2020 15:07, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: >>>> Am I wrong to expect that id user and getent group should list me >>>> the groups the user is part of. >>>>

Am I wrong to expect that id user and getent group should list me the groups the user is part of. For example wbinfo --group-info=office shows me that user jdoe and lgaga are part of the group, but then when doing id jdoe or id lgaga the office group is not shown, neither in getent group. What should I change in my config to have full group information working? root at samba01:~# wbinfo

On 02/05/2020 18:59, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: > On 2020-05-02 16:42, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 02/05/2020 15:07, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: >>> Am I wrong to expect that id user and getent group should list me >>> the groups the user is part of. >>> >>> For example wbinfo --group-info=office shows me that user jdoe and

Still Check this line from you named config. include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; This can cause an overlap in the zones, so be carefull with that one. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Dirk Laurenz via > samba > Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2017 1:26 > Aan: samba at

Raspian root at samba01:~# uname -a Linux samba01 4.9.14-v7+ #977 SMP Mon Mar 13 18:25:19 GMT 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux root at samba01:~# cat /etc/debian_version 8.7 root at samba01:~# samba -V Version 4.6.3 root at samba01:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] netbios name = SAMBA01 realm = LOCAL.xx.xx workgroup = LAURENZ server role = active

Ladies and Gentlemen, Greeting and Felicitations! We are running FC1 (Samba 3.0.2) and pam_mount 0.9.20. ?The Linux machine is a domain member, which has PDC and file server running NT4. I have setup Samba and winbind such that a user may log in on the Linux machine without having a local account, authentication being handled by PDC and this works successfully. ?If I login as an ordinary

On 2020-05-02 20:42, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/05/2020 19:28, Jelle de Jong via samba wrote: >> root at s4ad01:~# samba-tool user show jdoe > > There is no apparent reason why the groups do not work with chgrp, the > only reason I can think of is that the group was created and when you > tried to 'chgrp' the file, winbind read from its cache and it

On 2020-05-03 12:39, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Which Debian version do you use? Because in either version (0 oer 10) in > nsswitch.conf is wirtten "files winbind" in Debian 9 it's "compat > winbind" and in 10 it's "files systemd winbind" so you removed (I think) > systemd maybe you should put it back in root at samba01:~# dpkg -l winbind

Good moring, i investigated last night in this issue and was able to solve it. Short: Reason was a missing GPO file ====================== Long Version (how i think the failure occours) I have 3 samba ad services (all raspberry pi's) Because one pi crashed months ago (unreadable sd card) i move all roles from samba01 to samba02, demoted samba02 as bad dc and rejoined it as fresh install.

I'm using samba 4.0.3 (host samba01) and samba 4.0.5 (samba02) as DCs. samba01 already existed and I used samba-tool domain join to join samba02 to domain samba.x.y.z. This worked quiet well, but now replication fails: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool drs showrepl ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== ... DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=x,DC=y,DC=z Default-First-Site-Name\SAMBA01 via RPC