similar to: strange login problem

Dear Sirs ! I succesfully setup samba 1.9.18p3 to work with domain logons of win95. Works perfectly. Also I tryed to compile samba with -DNTDOMAIN and configure NT to with domain logons. If samba compiled with-NTDOMAIN, NT can't work with samba in any way - w/ domain logons and w/o. Below log file that created by samba, when I tryed to setup NT to domain logon to samba. Note: I uses unix

Could anyone tell me what I may be doing wrong here? I'm using samba-1.9.18p8 on a Linux 2.0.32 box, RedHat 5.0 install. I can descend into this share from a WinNT box just fine, but get the following error messages from a Win95 box. Thank you all in advance, -Jon Charette --------- Start log at debug level 4 ---------------------- 1998/07/08 13:20:22 Transaction 52 of length 47 switch

Hi there! I have been using samba 1.9.15p* on Irix 6.5, and it did what I need it to over win95 machines, but now I have a new win98 station, and when I try to reach a home directory over smb server, I got the next response: Note: my win98 station is MERLIN, the smb server runs on KEPLER, and I upgraded samba to 1.9.18p10 05/03/99 16:41:52 changed root to / priming nmbd sending a packet of len

Server: Slakware Linux 2.0.30, GNU C 2.7.2.1 Samba 18p7 Server is not using PAM and is a ypclient. Client PC's are DOS 6.20 with MS Client 3.0 and Windows 95. I am having trouble changing passwords using the "net password \\<server>" command from either DOS or Win95 command prompt. Changing passwords worked fine using Samba 17p3. The compile switch -DALLOW_CHANGE_PASSWORD

I am not getting much benefit from using oplocks = False or dos filetime resolution = True in Samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 and the Developer Studio in Digital Visual Fortran (v6.0) on WinNT4,SP4. I am also setting my PC clock to the samba server. I still get a lot of messages from the Studio informing me the source code files and workspaces have changed outside the editor or Studio

Hi! I am trying to print from an NT machine to a simple samba printer. That NT machine is the PDC and the samba box is having logins authenticated by the NT box. When I try to access the printer with my own username, it works fine. As soon as I have the account that is destined to do the printing print, it can't log in. I have included my smb.conf file and two log excerpts - one successful,

I have been trying to make password changing work with Samba from a Windows 95 clients. All the workstations use nonencrypted passwords. The server is SCO Open Server, Samba 1.9.18p10. The relevant lines of smb.conf are passwd chat = *Old*password* %o\n "1):" \n *New*password* %n\n *Re-enter*password* %n \n passwd chat debug = yes passwd program = /bin/passwd unix password sync = yes

We are having a problem with Microsoft visual C++ compiling source code maintained on a samba server. Occasionaly the compiler reports that it cant open the file vc50.pch. The samba server is running on a freebsd box. Taking a look at the log files it looks like when the operation fails the server is processing the command open (vc50.pch for exclusive use write setattrE write open (vc50.pch

Back to this problem Here a proof of it: 1. smbd version 3.0.11 started yaberge2@sda6 ==> p smbd root 13820 20662 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf root 20662 1 0 08:05:39 - 0:00 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -D -s/usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf yaberge2@sda6 ==> /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus Samba version 3.0.11

Dear all, I have made patch for samba-2.0.7/source/smbd/conn.c This will, instead of using by-directional link, use array for managing connections. # The patch does seems to work on my RHL6.1Ja(fixed) version of # Linux machine. I don't know about other OS/Architecture. This should work better then original because: 1) The original code used bitmap.c for looking empty area. But using

Are there any plans for a type of "snapshot" support, which could be use to make point in time consistent backups, similar to what lvm would allow you to do for a local volume? I'm really looking for a good way to back up my ocfs2 volume, but so far, all we've been able to use is rsync and custom scripts. Are there any other options? -- Michael S. Moody Sr. Systems

I'm trying to rsync a large data set (approx 140K files, 4TB) between machines directly connected on gigabit ethernet. Normally it runs around 20MB/sec, which is acceptable. However, it seems like there is one particular file that is giving rsync heartburn... whenever it encounters this file, the speed drops down to 150KB/sec speed within a few seconds. I don't know what's so

I would like to be able to exert certain types of control over the plotting of dendrograms (representing hierarchical clusterings) that I think is best achieved by modifying the dendrogram object prior to plotting. I am using the "dendrogram" class and associated methods. Define the cluster number of each cluster formed as the corresponding row of the merge object. So, if you are

Using Samba 1.9.18p10 I have found a difference between Win95 and WinNT: opening 'Lotus Freelance' files from Win95 is really slow (about 17 kB/s only) vs fast (~hundreds of kB/s) from WinNT. Looking into the log (with debug level=4) I see using Win95: switch message SMBopenX (pid 33994) Skipping become_user - already user unix_clean_name [./PRIVATE/Goyal_Sep98.PRZ] Got dir cache hit on

Hi all: I am experiencing a problem where WinNT and Samba are dropping connections during file transfers. I have the following smb.conf settings: keep alive = 30 dead time = 1440 socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_KEEPALIVE (although I tried IPTOS_NODELAY with no apparent benefit). The client is copying a large number of files up to the server, then there is a pause at a random file,

I''m trying this: firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("ATZ").once.ordered.and_return(AT_OK) firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("ATE0V1").once.ordered.and_return(AT_OK) firmware.should_receive(:execute).with("AT+CNUM").once.and_return(AT_OK) But rspec does not complain that "AT+CNUM" is never passed as argument. Bug? Or did I misinterpret the

I think you're making it far too difficult. What I do is something like this: [outgoing] include => internal include => longdistance ;Always include internal first, as matches from the first include ;will be used first. This allows you to make sure your internal ;extensions don't go out your trunks. [longdistance] ignorepat => 9; include => default; already included from

I posted a while back about getting very slow writes. People suggested modifying (increasing) SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF and this actually helps enormously. However, there is obviously something still not right. Writes are still about 1/2 the speed of reads. This only seems to affect Win95 clients (NT machines are fine). Doing a write of a 20mb file to the server generates the following message:

Hi Folks, I'm new to the list, and am writing because of some trouble I am having. An old version of Samba is involved, and I am not sure that I can upgrade. I am trying to explore the issue further. I am currently using Samba 1.9.18p10 (I can hear the smack of 1,000 hands slapping foreheads now -- please read on). The problem is that the Samba server hangs when I copy a large file (~100

======================================================== "Before anything else, preparation is the key to success." Alexander Graham Bell ======================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.10 release series. Changes since 4.10.3: --------------------- o Jeremy Allison