similar to: old smbd's block new connections

we are running samba (1.9.18p4) on a sun ultra(solaris 2.5) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ any now discribed file operations on the w95-pc are done using MS EXPLORER. - on a w95-pc a unix partition is mounted. - a file is copied from the mounted unix partition to the local pc-disk. - the just now copied file is changed on the unix host and shall

Hello everybody, I'm having problems trying to get smbclient give me right size for amanda backup. I'll give two examples: a 3.6GB w95 share and a 500MB nt4.0 share. With w95 smbclient gives inconsistent results (I saw in your maillists' archives that it may be that w95 can't handle that big partitions). This is what amanda is using to get the size: smbclient

Hi - I'll be the first to say I don't completely understand Windows networking, but I did get the following to work when everybody (clients-w95/server-solaris) were on the same subnet. W95 boots up and prompts for username,password, and domain. I log in, and presto I'm connected and netlogon scripts run and everything is great. This is when I'm testing it on a completely

Hello All, I've recenly installed RedHat Linux 9 in my Celvin EasyPC from Fujitsu Siemens. I've installed the minimal instalation. Video card, mouse, keyboard and everithing was detected and configured properly (I could install the packages in graphical mode). The problem came when I tried to ping another machine in my home network, all packages were being lost, so I checked at the hub

Hi, Somehow I've managed to get e2fsck to seg fault.. The filesystem in question started acting very strangely (e.g. filenames changing from music to MuSiC etc) so I rebooted, and since when fsck has crashed every time it has been run. I'm not really sure what any of this means, so I didn't know what debugging output to include, but below is the output of e2fsck. (I would have

Hi, Sorry if this is an old and fixed issue but I can't really seem to find a definitive explanation/fix to this in the mail lists. Ever since I upgraded to FC2 my server randomly decides that it can no longer access the disk and "aborts" the ext3 journal leaving it read-only as expected. I've seen the same errors on other mail list, explained away as disk or disk cable

> My HDD got /dev/hda1 which is DOS6.22+w3.11 > hda2 which is w95B > hda3 which is linux native > hda4 which is linux swap > > How sd I enter the win references in my config file in order to be able > to run both w311 and w95 programs ? > > One out of the difficulties is that with the last LILO, You can start > whether w311 whether w95 without having to change

Hello group; This is a question that has been posted before, but I haven't found an answer in the archives or in the FAQ/docs. I've been thru the DIAGNOSIS.txt, and get stuck on net view \\machname from a W95 OSR2 box (error 53 ...). Setup: Solaris machine running Samba 2.0.0. I can use smbclient to connect to it from various HP, AIX, Solaris, and Linux boxes, and NT 4.0 clients work

I've asked this question before, but got no response so I'll try one more time... I am running Samba 1.9.18p4 under Solaris 2.5.1. The PC clients are a mix of NT 4.0, NT 3.5, and W95. I have customers that, when they connect to a share, they may not see all of the directories under that share. Others may connect to the same share at the same time, and see the missing directories. It

Hi! I'm trying to use a printer connected to a Win95 box from Linux but when I try 'smbclient -L win95_machine' I get the following message: SMBnegprot failed. myname=TARKUS destname=WIN95 - ERRSRV - 1311 I'm using samba-1.9.18p5. The access in the other way (W95 to Linux shares) works without any problems. When I set the printer as shared in the W95 box it is possible to

Hi, I am planning to run Samba smbd within an HP MC/ServiceGuard cluster (2 machines, 2 packages). Essentially, this could involve (whilst it's not the usual scenario), having two smbd's running on the same machine, albeit listening on seperate IP addresses. They should not need to access any of the same directories. Is this a problem? Has anyone else on this list used smbd within

I seem to be having a problem whereby every time a user fails to authenticate with Samba, smbd stops responding to that particular client and has to be restarted. Apart from 'what on earth's going wrong with my authentication', there are two things I'd like to know: firstly, is it the main smbd/all smbd's which lock, and secondly, if not is there any way (on SuSE Linux) to

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jim Ballantine <j.ballantine at gmail.com> Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:16 AM Subject: spawning smbd's To: samba at lists.samba.org We are running a Red Hat Linux 6 system with samba 3.6.23 installed, and configured as a stand alone server. A couple of users are either spawning excessive numbers of smbd, or failing to kill them off. A

Help! I've got two new servers. I installed redhat v7.3 on one myself, and have got it to run samba successfully and connect to a W95 PC. The other was bought pre-installed with the same linux version, and I cannot get the W95 box to get beyond "No domain server was available...". As far as I see, \etc\samba\smb.conf files are identical, as are the \etc\hosts files. I'm using

Hi. I need some help from the experts please. I am experiencing a syslinux error message and I cannot find much in the way of help or reference from the documentation or the archives. Using a USB hard drive (as detailed below), I have three primary partitions and one extended partition. Disk /dev/sdb: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders Units = cylinders of

On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 23:47:50 -0500, Guy Dallaire wrote: ... >When I try to access a file or a subdirectory under the share, I get a message telling me "File not found", >or "this folder does not exist". > >I tried all sorts of upper/lower, preserve, case combinations in smb.conf, nothing seems to work. I tried >with debug level = 3 and I noticed a lot of

Hi all, We're still suffering here with odd performance issues on our Samba 3.0.24 install here on our big chunky Solaris 9 box. The user perceived issue is slow performance (whilst browsing in Windows Explorer, or opening files from within applications etc.etc.) The obvious symptom on the server is a collection of smbd's at the top of the 'top' listing. 4 or 5 or so taking

Hi, I''ve been a happy user of Mocha for a while now. My current project is by far the most complicated I''ve ever worked on and Mocha has made testing it much easier than it would otherwise be. So, I was highly disturbed to come in this morning, run svn up and find that something in today''s update broke lots of my tests. I use Mocha as a Rails plugin under

On Sat, 11 Jul 1998 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1743 > From: Carlos Vidal <carlos@tarkus.se> > To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au > Subject: Problems accessing a W95 share > Message-ID: <199807091801.SAA03246@tarkus.se> > > Hi! > > I'm trying to use a printer connected to a Win95 box from Linux but when I try > 'smbclient -L

Hi all, We just got Samba for OS/390 up and running and it works fine. But we get a problem for some W95 PC's when they try to establish a network connection, the debuglevel 10 shows the following messages : --------------------------------------------------------------------------- lp_file_list_changed() file /etc/smb.conf