similar to: SAMBA digest 1621

Summary: ---------------------- Hello, when using the MS NT SrvTools (User & Server Manager for Domains), I get an error when I try to access an individual user's properties ("The following error occurred while accessing the properties of the user <blah> \n The specified procedure could not be found \n The user properties cannot be edited or viewed at this time"); however,

rpcclient sound cool. I am running 2.0.6 Samba. 'rpcclient' exists with it but a call to 'man rpcclient' gets no results. Could it be that the man pages are in a later release? Dan dmalcolm@hiwaay.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" <lkcl@samba.org> To: "Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM"

Noticed that no-one has applied this patch to the current 2.0 tree yet. It does work - I've tested it. Alan. *** srv_lsa.c.old Tue Sep 14 09:09:12 1999 --- srv_lsa.c Tue Sep 14 09:12:19 1999 *************** *** 586,603 **** static BOOL api_lsa_close( uint16 vuid, prs_struct *data, prs_struct *rdata) { ! /* XXXX this is NOT good */ ! size_t i; !

Kind Attention: Andrew Tridgell Jeremy Allison Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton John H Terpstra Dear Sir, Good wishes. I am in big trouble. Please, help me. I am trying to setup and configure our college network. It comprises of the following: 1. RedHat Linux Server, Assembled PC, 20GB IDE, P-III, 400 MHz, 256 MB MM eth0: IP Address: 192.168.0.1,

On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Robert Vasvari wrote to samba-ntdom: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm planning to run my own SMB server on some box, > > binding to a user level port (>1024). Problem is, > > WINDOWS (both Nt and 95) only connects to an SMB > > server on ports 137-139. So, the

ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/alpha and mirror sites mainly a maintenance update: all bzeros replaced, as was done in cvs main / 2.0. readline detection added. if someone wants to add an autoconf test to detect -lcurses being needed by solaris readline, please create and send one. usrmgr user-account changing is now accepted (on systems compiled with the default, --with-sam-pwdb=passdb, this means

Hello to all. I'm testing Samba as a domain controller (I'm using tdbsam). All is working perfectly so far, but I have an issue when using srvtools to manage my users. I'm only able to assign the primary group to an user account. All additionnal groups added to the "member of:" section are ignored (I press OK and the srvtools don't complain or anything, but when I

I want to use NT4's SRVTOOLS to manage the Samba-PDC,But when i use it ,i mean ,when i add a account for windows,Samba can only receive the username from the tool. The others ,such as logon_path,Fullname and Description cannot be received by samba. Is some thing wrong with samba? what can i do ? I add the information of a user to the LDAP-server by LDIF-file handly .It works fine.And the

i've been examining the DCE/RPC over SMB Trans pipes, and i have to say that i'm quite impressed with the design: my compliments to the NT team. i find it quite an agreeable challenge working out the bits that are (and are not) decoded by NETMON.EXE. there are a couple of niggling things, about which absolutely nothing can be done, but i thought i'd mention them anyway: - the

I want to use NT4's SRVTOOLS to manage the Samba-PDC,But when i use it ,i mean ,when i add a account for windows,Samba can only receive the username from the tool. The others ,such as logon_path,Fullname and Description cannot be received by samba. Is some thing wrong with samba? what can i do ? I add the information of a user to the LDAP-server by LDIF-file handly .It works fine.And the

I am using Samba 3.0.10-1 on Fedora Core 3. Most everything seems to be working as I expect it to except when I try to use the srvtools package to administrate the users and groups in the domain. I want to check and see whether maybe I am just misunderstanding usage as opposed to their being a configuration problem. If I log into my workstation as Administrator, either the local account or into

On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > you'll need to do encrypted passwords for your users. what version of > > unix are you using? have you looked into PAMs? (plug-in authentication > > modules) > > The problem is, we'll never have cleartext passwords for the user. > Maintaining a separate password database is unnaceptable. If we wanted to

Good morning, we've recently had some strange message in /var/log/syslog. System: debian bullseye, kernel 5.10.0-21-amd64 and 5.10.0-22-amd64 gluster 10.3 The message look like: Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715229] INFO: task glfs_fusenoti:2787 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Apr 27 13:30:18 piggy kernel: [24287.715327] Not tainted 5.10.0-22-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.178-3 Apr

I don't think the issue is on gluster side, it seems the issue is on kernel side (possible deadlock in fuse_reverse_inval_entry) https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bda9a71980e083699a0360963c0135657b73f47a On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:48?PM Hu Bert <revirii at googlemail.com> wrote: > Good morning, > > we've recently had some strange

hello, i've just finished in setuping my simple samba pdc (no ldap, just tdbsam), everything work, i can create account from a xp client with srvtools, modify propoerties of a user/groupe, no problem. but but, i'm unable to let account with no password, i mean, when i'm creating/modify an account with srvtools, i've got the error "access denied", but when i put

Hi all, Sorry for distubing you with this minor problem, but: I've configured samba3 for ldapsam and successfuly joined a WinNT Server 4.0 with on the fly account creation (I have root in LDAP). Now I'm able to manage my samba3 with user manager for domains from srvtools, but not nexus :-(. From my point of view the sadest thing is that on 9x no other application can retrive user

Hello, I install wine 20041201 with a rpm from sourceforge. I always have a wrong version number : [didier@Lucius didier]$ ls -l /usr/bin/wine -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7036 d?c 1 21:42 /usr/bin/wine* [didier@Lucius didier]$ /usr/bin/wine Wine 20040914 Usage: wine PROGRAM [ARGUMENTS...] Run the specified program wine --help Display this help and exit wine

Hi Gregory, On the questions. > Is there a good reason to avoid Samba internal DNS? No, imo not, but i only use bind9_dlz because i need bind in my lan for other setups also. I just used my RSAT on my win7 64b, but at my point it works fine. I do have questions to get a better impression of the setup. Whats the os your using with RSAT and did u use DOM\Administrator or an other account?

OK, here's another go-around. This patch leaves the bzImage itself unmodified, but it changes the payload into an ELF file. That is, the 32-bit decompression/relocation+compressed kernel is now a properly formed ELF file. One thing that fell out of this is that code32_start end up being a pointer to the ELF header rather than an entrypoint. Rather than reproducing Vivek's (?) hack of

OK, here's another go-around. This patch leaves the bzImage itself unmodified, but it changes the payload into an ELF file. That is, the 32-bit decompression/relocation+compressed kernel is now a properly formed ELF file. One thing that fell out of this is that code32_start end up being a pointer to the ELF header rather than an entrypoint. Rather than reproducing Vivek's (?) hack of