similar to: Win95 client on a remote subnet connot connect.

Hi all, I have search and read that NT automatic printer installation soon should be supported. This was in an email from march 30, 1999. Was is the status on that project? Best regards /Thomas -- Thomas Hansen Phone: (+45) 3385 2061 Unix Admin. Fax: (+45) 3385 1053 MAN B&W Diesel A/S E-Mail: tmh@manbw.dk Dep. 9544 WWW: www.manbw.dk

I have got a nice error, :) When running winesetup, chosing to use a 'fake windows' I can set all the stuff, but when I hit the Finihs-button, I get >Error in Tcl script > >Error: 1000 >id: cannot find name for group ID 1000 Someone who knows howto avoid ? When I select to use a windows-dir (real windows) -> it works ... Tnx michael

Hello all, I have a RedHat 5.1 system running SAMBA and the machines and users log on properly but no one can select, create, delete or do anything with subdirectories. I checked the logs and it seems that the share names are not being 'made' properly. Is there a setting or problem with 5.1 install that I need to change??? Thanks Paul Farber Farber Technology

Hi, all I am trying to use the label_wrap_gen function in this website. https://github.com/hadley/ggplot2/wiki/labeller I tried to make a long name like this Light and heavy good vehicles (diesel) -\nGVX f2 = facet_grid(vehicle ~ ., labeller=label_wrap_gen(width=15)) eventually, I got something like this in my label... *Light and heavy good vehicles (diesel) - GVX* I suppose the

On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? > > I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed > down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. > Crumbs. John, Do you know of anything that went into

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Hi Chris and others! I totally support any work in this direction. In the current state LNT’s regression detection system is too noisy, which makes it almost impossible to use in some cases. If after each run a developer gets a dozen of ‘regressions’, none of which happens to be real, he/she won’t care about such reports after a while. We clearly need to filter out as much noise as we can - and

On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, > > I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest > LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on > http://188.40.87.11:8000 > <http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/16?compare_to=9&baseline=9&aggregation_fn=median>. > > Especially, I also evaluated

At 2013-08-01 23:29:14,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/31/2013 09:23 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es >> <mailto:tobias at grosser.es>> wrote: >> >>>On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>>> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers,

On 07/31/2013 09:23 PM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es > <mailto:tobias at grosser.es>> wrote: > >>On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >>> >>> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >>> LLVM/Polly source

In that example you could make outgoing calls only correct? (since incoming likely needs port forwards) I guess the questions becomes "how often are you going to do that to justify the extra $100 or so you going to pay for a wifi sip phone?" Paul Fielding (paul.fielding@shaw.ca) wrote: > > I think some people are missing the point. You can't throw your cordless >

At 2013-07-31 22:50:57,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/30/2013 10:03 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias and all Polly developers, >> >> I have re-evaluated the Polly compile-time performance using newest >> LLVM/Polly source code. You can view the results on >> http://188.40.87.11:8000 >>

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.

This senario works great! I have a Snom phone coupled with a Linksys Wireless game adapter. When on a event trip I was able to have the snom ring where ever there was a signal. So the proof of concept passed. Unfortunatly all the wifi phones I have read about seem to suck! -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com <asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com>

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.

On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On Wednesday February 24th, at 6pm UTC time, the DC hosting some of > the CentOS equipments used for various roles had suffered from > multiple electricity power outages. The facility was completely dark > for just under 2 hrs, and we were able to start recovering services by > 8pm UTC. By midnight we had most services

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.