Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "unix gethostbyname for WINS"
1998 Dec 04
0
AW: Smbclient bind to IP
I think, it's a good idea to control the binds of the smbclient as it's
possible on smbd.
Rudolf Kollien
email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de
Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de
***************************************************************************
Never trust a operating system you have no sources for
***************************************************************************
Buying an
1998 Dec 03
2
Smbclient bind to IP
We are running a Sequent unix database server that uses smbclient to print through the NT servers. Our network
has mulitple sites connected via frame relay. Now the problem; we have been attempting to tune the network to
improve database response. And would like to have the smbclient bind to a second IP address on our Sequent box
so we can prioritize traffic based upon the source IP
1998 Jul 31
0
Cal Comp Plotters and Printing
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 21:05:48 -0700
> From: "K. Scott Parks" <sparks99@pacbell.net>
> To: samba@samba.anu.edu.au
> Subject: Cal Comp Plotters and Printing
> Message-ID: <35BFF11B.2B15@pacbell.net>
>
> Has anyone set up a calcomp plotter with samba?
> Do you use the bsd lp commands? Any help would be
>
1998 Oct 21
0
SAMBA digest 1850 (DNS name and netbios name differ)
The default setting for Win95 are to do DNS before WINS. You can try to change
this order to see if this fixes the problem. I clipped the following from the
Technet article - Q139270. It would be easier to disable DNS on a Win95 client
to see if the name resolution order is causing your problem; then do all this
happy stuff...
------------------------------------ cut
1998 Jul 30
1
REMOTE SHELL COMMAND
I use WFW and Samba Version 1.9.17p1, on Sun Solaris 2.4
I want to use remote shell command from my PC
Can you help me
best regards
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
1997 Dec 12
2
How to get nmbd to work?
I have NEVER been able to get nmbd to work in anything even remotely
approximating a usable fashion.
All I want it to do is DNS lookups.
I can't even get it to do that reliably. It looks in some cases like it
isn't even sending a response back to the querying clients.
When I do a request that fails, I get this:
---
nmb packet from 192.55.114.4(3175) header: id=8172 opcode=Query(0)
1997 Jul 30
0
R-alpha: more on line types
forgot to fix psx11.c and devPicTeX.c while I was at it (devPicTeX.c
doesn't seem to change the color). Should psx11.c be devpsx11.c? Diffs:
*** psx11.c.orig Wed Jul 30 10:08:48 1997
--- psx11.c Wed Jul 30 10:09:10 1997
***************
*** 293,298 ****
--- 293,299 ----
}
if(fg != NA_INTEGER) {
psx11_SetColor(fg);
+ psx11_SetLinetype(GP->lty);
PostScriptOpenRectangle(psfp,
2012 Jan 24
0
rpc.statd: gethostbyname error for ...
Hi,
Lately, the system log on my CentOS 5 box, with all the latest updates,
have started filling up with messages of the form:
Jan 24 09:47:26 i58524 rpc.statd[3452]: gethostbyname error for i58524
Jan 24 09:47:26 i58524 rpc.statd[3452]: STAT_FAIL to i58524 for SM_MON
of 10.30.39.59
Jan 24 09:47:26 i58524 kernel: lockd: cannot monitor 10.30.39.59
It does not seem like there is really anything
2005 Dec 13
0
Re: gethostbyname(my_name) and IL2-Sturmovik
> Ok, I've just checked doing the same thing under windows.
>
> The test(ripdaveno is the name of the Computer I tested on):
>
> {
> ...
> hostent* h = gethostbyname("ripdaveno");
> char* str = inet_ntoa(*((in_addr*)h->h_addr_list[0]));
> ...
> }
>
> The string in str was "192.168.2.75" which is my Network IP-Adress. With
>
2015 Jan 28
0
Dovecot & gethostbyname() vulnerability
So just a quick note:
Dovecot in general doesn't do DNS lookups, except the ones in configuration files and such. So I don't think there are any Dovecot setups which do DNS lookups for untrusted hostnames.
Also, gethostbyname() is used only if IPv6 support isn't compiled into Dovecot. And IPv6 support is enabled by default if the libc is detected to support it, so pretty much all
2014 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] possible bug in COFFObjectFile::getSymbolType()
The section is .text, so I assume it’s got IMAGE_SCM_CNT_CODE set. The problem is the symbol is marked (read & execute), but the test is (read & !write), so the symbol gets marked as ST_Data instead of ST_Other.
From: David Majnemer [mailto:david.majnemer at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 5:44 PM
To: Ted Woodward
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]
2015 Jan 28
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Banton" <centos at web.org.uk>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 6:10:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
>
> Hi,
>
> For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an
> obligation to look after
2015 Jan 27
2
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On Tue, January 27, 2015 2:35 pm, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>>
>>> <SNIP>
>>>>
>>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 -
2009 May 25
0
gethostbyname clarification
I have an issue, although it's a result of sketchy code in the sip implementation
in Asterisk that's been around forever, I am sure I am going to have to fix it some other
way as many people have waited with no fix yet from Digium.
If a name resolution fails for a remote sip peer, the entire stack tanks and local
sip phones don't work either. We have several sip trunks and an analog
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>
<SNIP>
>
> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>
upstream references:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0092.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-0235
Note that in the openwall.com URL you provided
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Packages are being built for CentOS 5, 6 & 7 at the moment:
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560128242682966017 &
https://twitter.com/CentOS/status/560138182441070592
On 27 January 2015 at 20:22, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
> > On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
> >>
>
2015 Jan 27
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
On 01/27/2015 12:22 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, January 27, 2015 1:58 pm, Peter Lawler wrote:
>> On 28/01/15 04:47, Always Learning wrote:
>>>
>>> Saw this on the Exim List:-
>>>
>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> I use Exim on C5 and C6 - should I be worried about Exim on C6 ?
>>>
>>
>> upstream references:
2015 Jan 28
0
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Hi,
For reasons which are too tiresome to bore you all with, I have an
obligation to look after a suite of legacy CentOS 4.x systems which
cannot be migrated upwards.
I note on https://access.redhat.com/articles/1332213 the following
comment from a RHN person:
>We are currently working on and testing errata for RHEL 4, we will
>post an update for it as soon as it's ready. Thank
2004 Oct 06
1
Asterisk and Festival, getting gethostbyname failed error
Interestingly enough I had this same problem today....
1. I created the directory and permissions for the directory "
/var/lib/asterisk/festivalcache/ " (per the comment in the festival.conf
file)
2. I had to comment out some things in the festival.conf file: the
"host" line, the "port" line, and the "festivalcommand" line. I have
also noticed the
2015 Jan 27
3
CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname
Saw this on the Exim List:-
From: Tony Finch <dot--at-- at dotat.at>
Subject: [exim] CVE-2015-0235 - glibc gethostbyname remotely exploitable
via exim
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:33:45 +0000
"The Exim mail server is exploitable remotely if configured to perform
extra security checks on the HELO and EHLO commands ("helo_verify_hosts"
or "helo_try_verify_hosts"