similar to: New Samba alpha release - 1.9.18alpha13

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p1. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/samba-1.9.18p1.tar.gz This is a bugfix release, designed to address issues that users have reported with the 1.9.18 major release. Due to an oplock problem in 1.9.18 (fixed in this release) that could cause data loss in certain circumstances, it is recommended that all

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p4. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/samba-1.9.18p4.tar.gz This is a bugfix release, designed to address issues that users have reported with the 1.9.18p3 release. There is some new functionality, described below. Password Changing. ------------------ Samba now supports Windows 95 clients changing both their

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p7. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/samba-1.9.18p7.tar.gz This release is a security patch fix for a security hole reported on BugTraq by Drago. No exploit code was published with the report, so no immediate 'canned' exploit was available to an attacker The security hole may have allowed

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p8. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/samba-1.9.18p8.tar.gz Binary packages will be made available for this release within a short time. A separate announcement will be made for the release of these packages. Offers of binary Samba packages for various systems are welcome and should be sent to

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p5. It may be fetched via ftp from : ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/samba-1.9.18p5.tar.gz This is a bugfix release, designed to address issues that users have reported with the 1.9.18p4 release. It is intended that the next Samba release will be an alpha of Samba 1.9.19, which will contain significant new functionality for integrating Samba

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.18p10. Note that the 1.9.18p9 code was not distributed due to a problem discovered during the final QA testing phase. However, in order not to allow any confusion about versions the Samba Team are upping the patch revision number to ensure we can identify a particular release of code exactly. It may be fetched via ftp from :

> Sorry, but in the first mail I forgot to attach the Makefile and I > forgot also to mention that I already tried the password handling in win95 > via the registry. > > De Boe Bart wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I need to install Samba on a HP J210 HPUX 10.20. > > I downloaded and compiled version 1.9.18p10. > > > > Following problems are

The Samba Team have just released a new alpha version of Samba - 1.9.17alpha5. It is our hope that this will be the last version of the 1.9.17 alpha series before the full 1.9.17 release. The new release is available from the URL: ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/alpha/samba-1.9.17alpha5.tar.gz and is in the form of a gzip'ed tar file. Here is the WHATSNEW.txt from the release. Regards,

On Wed, 13 May 1998, Jean-Francois Micouleau wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > You have to make the distinction between users and trusts accounts. > > > > why? not in my book you don't, and not in an NT SAM you don't. trust > > accounts _are_ SAM users, but just with a different ACB_xxxx value. > > your

Hi all: I'm running Caldera OpenLinux with kernel 2.0.29, shadow password and quotas. The shadow kit is 980403 and is working fine. Well, when I try to compile I got this output : ------------------------- Begin Compile output ------------------------ Using CFLAGS = -O -DSMBLOGFILE="/usr/local/samba/var/log.smb" -DNMBLOGFILE="/usr /local/samba/var/log.nmb"

The Samba Team are pleased to announce Samba 1.9.17p5. This is a patch release designed to fix the few bugs that users had reported with our last stable release, 1.9.17p4. This release adds no new functionality, and if you were not impacted by the bugs then there is no need to upgrade from 1.9.17p4. Note however, that *all* users should upgrade to at least Samba version 1.9.17p2 due to a

I have encountered problems when compiling SAMBA 2.2.8a on a RS/6000 7025-F50 (AIX 4.3.3.0-11), during the 'make' operation. I am using GCC 2.95.3.0, which I installed from Bull. Could someone review these results and provide some guidance for a solution? Thank you. ========================== The 'configure' operation completed with the expected messages (see below),

Why I can't compile SAMBA at HP-UX 9.07, UP-UX 10.20. I tried samba-1.9.18p8 version. And I uncommented 'HP-UX 10.20' at 'WHICH OPERATING SYSTEM?' of 'Makefile' file. Then 'make' in prompt. But, I failed. Please Help Me !!!! The error Meassage is, Using CFLAGS = -O -DSMBLOGFILE="/usr/local/samba/var/log.smb" -DNMBLOGFILE="/usr/local/sam

JdL> I've always been afraid to ask, but here goes... JdL> What's the advantage of GUEST_SESSSETUP being a compile time parameter, JdL> instead of having it as an smb.conf parameter? I'd like to second this question! Also, just in case that it will not become an smb.conf parameter: can't it be added as a comment to the Makefile (probably near the comments to

Hi, I have a problems and I hope somebody can help me. I currently install samba 1.9 on my Sun Ultra Sparc running solaris 2.6...but my problem is..i cannot find any files by the name "testparm" therefore I am having trouble checking my "smb.conf". Can somebody help me where to look for these files. Sincerely, Aqbal, Department of Hydraulics and Hydrology Fac. of Civil

hee hee, jean francois is going to be annoyed. this code is still under "definite alpha" status, but i really, really wanted to get it in there asap. so, the latest cvs checkin adds the ability to use an ldap schema for the passwords, not that i know what one of those actually is (only kidding: i've just never set one up yet). here it is: Subject: LDAP schema objectclass

After a nights rest (and a successful solution to my NT authorization problems) and short apology is in order to the list. My attitude in the last message was less than helpful and I apologize. On a helpful note here is what I learned: Regardless of the interpretation of any of the samba documentation Samba-1.9.18 and later versions fully support DES encryption for WindowsNT without *ANY*

Those of you wishing to follow the Samba source code closely can now get direct read-only access to the Samba source code repository. This means you can see every piece of code we commit to the tree the minute we commit it. I haven't provided this type of access up to now as I couldn't work out how to make it totally safe, so that a malicious user can't gain write access. I've now

> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: > >I

I wonder if it is possible to reduce the memory footprint of a pack of 6 mongrels by about 70 meg. In reading Hongli''s blog about his revisions to Ruby GC (last Monday Matz if he could use Hongli''s work), I was wondering at the size (in RSS) of all the mongrels in a cluster. It has always seemed just too big for my C-binary intuition. Why is so much of the memory of the parent