similar to: Problems with Self extracting zip files

Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: > >I

I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my 9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in order to

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

hi out there, first of all: samba is pretty cool! question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')? cheers jodok ;----------------------------------- Jodok Sutterluety Austria, Vienna Tel: ++43 1 4080791 email: js@bonus.unterland.at ;-----------------------------------

Hello, I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries: [global] hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122 workgroup = IMBNET printing = SYSV printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd share modes = yes browseable = yes ....

I am getting a complaint that my Samba server running on Solaris 2.5 cannot be found from a user's PC running NT Workstation 4.0. Any suggestions? thanks, garrett curtis garrettc@eos.net

We fixed our own problem. Turns out that server taber is at service pack 1 and hyde is at service pack 3. In service pack 3 the smb redirector doesn't send unencrypted passwords without a registry entry to enable them. See article Q166730 at www.microsoft.com for details. This brings up another question. Is anyone out there using Samba with the encrypted passwords from NT 4? Ed Maple UNIX

Hello all, I wish to perform a mcnemar test for a 3 by 3 matrix. By running the slandered R command I am getting a result but I am not sure I am getting the correct one. Here is an example code: (tt <- as.table(t(matrix(c(1,4,1 , 0,5,5, 3,1,5), ncol = 3)))) mcnemar.test(tt, correct=T) #And I get: McNemar's Chi-squared

Hi all, We (the Samba Team) need some feed back from our user community. Anyone want to help out? All you need to do is post us a one liner. Tell us if you want 8 character length limited print share names or larger. If you really must have longer print share names - then how many characters? Should we limit the length? Background: >From time to time we receive patches to increase the maximum

Hi, I use Samba 2.07 as shipped with Debian 2.2. I have two computers connected in a network, a WinNT 4 SP3 box and the Debian box. With my previous setup (Debian 2.1, Samba 1.9?) it was a snap to share the home directories and the printer on the Debian box. After upgrading, things changed a bit: - I can still connect from my NT account to my home dir on the Debian box with the same account

Hello! I read your notice about your problem with Windows NT and servicepack 3. Did you find any solution? I have the same problem: I can?t see other computers on the network when I?m running SAMBA. I would appreciate if you could help me. Leif Magnusson

Hello all, I have a recently discovered problem. It's creating a crisis. Most of my local GL is in Quicken. The Quicken data directory i on a Samba share on one of my Linux boxen. I am running p11. I use "force user" and "force group" to make sure that any entries are made under the same permissions and uuid. The "ledger" directory is shared out to two

Hi, I'm trying to write a small microsimulation in R: that is, I have a dataframe with info on N individuals for the base-year and I have to grow it dynamically for T periods: df = data.frame( id = 1:N, x =.... ) The most straightforward way to solve the problem that came to my mind is to create for every period a new dataframe: for(t in 1:T){ for(i in 1:N){ row = data.frame( id =

please take us off of the samba e-mail list for the time being thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 5:44 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2283 > SAMBA Digest 2283 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue

Hello: I wonder if I could get a little help with random sampling in R. I have a vector of length 7375. I would like to draw 3 distinct random samples, each of length 100 without replacement. I have tried the following: d1 <- 1:7375 set.seed(7) i <- sample(d1, 100, replace=F) s1 <- sort(d1[i]) s1 d2 <- d1[-i] set.seed(77) j <- sample(d2, 100, replace=F) s2 <- sort(d2[j])

Hello root@inet.hkg.com, It looks like someone, at your end, is leaking SPAM into the Samba list. The apparent source of this SPAM is <inet.hkg.com> which, unbelieveably, is a real address. They are then relay-raping the Singapore Network to get it into this list. After careful deliberation, I have conciously decided to forward this one message into the samba lists. All future SPAM

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,

Hello How do you compare R to SAS in terms of speed and management of large datasets? What about Revolution R? I've seen on their site, they claim that Revolution R is much faster than R and it's multithread... Can you really notice the difference?. What dissadvantage does it have? I think it's based on R 2.10. but R already issued the version 2.12 Regards What alternative