similar to: Samba performance on Fast Ethernet networks when linked to Win95

Howdy: I'm new to this samba stuff, but I've run across a problem that doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. It seems that OSR/2 clients (with all the M$ system updates; I already added the EnableClearTextPassword key) that have had their TCP/IP settings tweaked in the registry (eg, MaxMTU=576, TTL=32, RWIN added, etc) for DUN connections have mucho problems with a samba

The default setting for Win95 are to do DNS before WINS. You can try to change this order to see if this fixes the problem. I clipped the following from the Technet article - Q139270. It would be easier to disable DNS on a Win95 client to see if the name resolution order is causing your problem; then do all this happy stuff... ------------------------------------ cut

My problem is simple and I've issued it about 3 weeks ago. I want the UAs to authenticate with a number to the SIP server. Is this possible? For example, I configured an AT-RG613TX (Allied Telesyn Residential Gateway). In its configuration it is not possible for me to skip specifying a number (ex. 102) along with the username. I've looked into the source code (SIP implementation) of

Hi Adrian, Sunday, April 4, 2004, 10:22:33 PM, you wrote: AP> We have thought about using static MAC entries per port on managed AP> switches installed at the client endpoints, but that would require a AP> overwhelming budget. We are also thinking about L2TP and PPPoE, but I AP> am uncertain about compatibility. AP> What would you recommand ? Are there any other elegant

Hello! My name is Denis Shaposhnikov. I'm looking for a job in EU (Germany is preferably) as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Skills: * Operating systems: UNIX (FreeBSD 2.2 - STABLE), Cisco IOS (10.x - 12.x), ZyNOS. Understand how systems work and is able to apply this

I have installed a samba server (1.9.17p4 Linux 2.0.36 from redhat 5.0) on a dual pentiumII 350 64Mram with two ultra wide scsi disk drives on a 100Mbit port of a 16x10Mbit + 2x100Mbit Allied Telesyn switch .The copying operations work at quite same speed even I copy from Samba server or a Win9x Station if I try to open a Word doc from server it is much, much slower ( aprox 20 times slower

I've been attempting to tune my samba server and workstations to work efficiently on a 1GB lan. So far I've increased the MTU on both the workstation and linux server to 9000. Then on the windows xp workstation, I've added these registry keys and rebooted: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters] "TcpWindowSize"=dword:3FFFF700

Solaris 7 doesn't have a ut_host element in utmp...patch let's bsd-login.c compile with this knowledge: *** openssh-1.2pre13.orig/bsd-login.c Fri Nov 19 00:32:34 1999 --- openssh-1.2pre13/bsd-login.c Fri Nov 19 14:23:49 1999 *************** *** 40,45 **** --- 40,46 ---- static char *rcsid = "$Id: bsd-login.c,v 1.1 1999/11/19 04:32:34 damien Exp $"; #endif /*

In the reg files there is a number at the end of every section/key property. Example: [System\\CurrentControlSet\\Services\\VxD\\MSTCP] 1296424715 What is the purpose of "1296424715"? Is this a time stamp or checksum?

Hello Samba folks, I thought you might be able to help me. I have 2 machines, 1 is FreeBSD, 1 is win95. They can't ping each other, but the bsd box comes up in Network Nieghborhood when Samba is active. What's going on? Is it not possible to ping a windows machine from a unix box? They are on the same hub via UTP. IPs are 192.168.1.x and netmasks are same (255.255.255.0).

Hmph. I wish I had checked the list before I wasted a half-day on this. Yes, the problem exists under AIX (mine's 4.3.1). Here's the patch I came up with, which may be a little more straightforward than the original. I confirmed that it works under Solaris 2.[67] too. Don't forget to run autoconf. --- bsd-login.c.orig Sat Dec 25 18:21:48 1999 +++ bsd-login.c Thu Apr 20 18:26:41

Okay, I'm starting to get excited now because I think someone from the Samba lists has pushed me in the right direction here. To recap: I can't ping my win machine (192.168.1.2) from my FreeBSD box (192.168.1.3) and vice versa. Both subnet masks are 255.255.255.0 and ipfw is not running. I loaded the dos config program for the card on my BSD machine (by booting off DOS floppy

Dear, I have two Asterisk PBXs with an E1 interface/RJ-45 port in both boxes. I need to connect both PBXs with E1/R2 and UTP cable. What are the requirements to deploy the UTP cable ??? Straight-through or crossover ??? What are the pinouts in both peers ??? Thanks a lot, Alejandro

This is based on openssh-2.0.0beta1. There are a few rough spots: 1) SunOS doesn't have ut_type in struct utmp so I just whacked in the old login() from openssh-1.2.3. 2) There is a SUNOS4 section added to defines.h -- this could probably be a bit cleaner. 3) sigaction on SunOS is implemented via #defines to sigvec, thus there is no SA_RESTART (this is the default behavior).

Constantin Teodorescu <teo@flex.ro> wrote: > When doing this transfer, the LED from the network card is flashing > from time to time (0.2 sec on, 0.4 sec off), the average load of > the hub is about 5% and the "collisions LED" is on merely all the > time. This doesn't look like a problem in either the TCP implementation or the application level software on either

Hi, The following error message appeared in syslog while the filesharing client overnet was running and writing to the disk. I first only noticed that suddenly Opera was frozen and no new terminals could be started. Regards W. Pichler syslog Jun 15 13:15:34 pc kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000e Jun 15 13:15:34 pc kernel: printing eip: Jun

I just made one of my 4.x remote servers inaccessible and just tested it on my 5.x laptop, and it does the same thing ... not sure if this is considered a 'desirable' effect, or a but ... but ... 'ifconfig <device> -alias' will wipe out all IPs on the device: mobile# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask

I am running a Fedora 2 machine with Samba 3.0.7. I am using LDAP to store the user info. Everything is from stock rpms. I am using domain logins for my users. Since 3.0.6, whenever someone tries to write a file to the server, it is extremely slow. It doesn't matter whether it's a Win XP sp1, sp2 or Win2000 client but for some reason, my computer didn't have this problem.

We have a 2-node Oracle RAC that keeps getting the following error: kernel: nfs: RPC call returned error 88 The storage being mounted is netapp. We don't see any errors/issues on the storage itself or the switches this client is connecting thru. The NFS network is a 2-interface ( 2 x 1Gb UTP) bond which shows no errors of any kind. We are mounting with the following mount options:

Hello Im from Denmark and i've just got my Digium TE405P. But i have some problems when i connect it to my E1 connection (ISDN30). My telco delivered a alcatel box witch have a G.703 120ohm (DB9 with a serial to rj45) and a 75ohm coax connection. I've tried to connect using the 120ohm with rj45 and a ordinary utp cable. But it dosent seem to work. I've tried several zaptel.conf