similar to: Slow directory listings of our user directories

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:37:43PM +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: >On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:35:00PM +0100, Stephan Roth via samba wrote: >>My goal with activating vfs_fruit was to speed up directory listings >>for Mac clients, which works. Can the accompanying slowdown for >>Windows clients be avoided? > >yeah, I guess so, but somebody has to dig through the

Listing directories with many files (10000+) from a Windows client is nociceably slower when vfs_fruit is enabled on the samba server compared to the same setup without vfs_fruit. On my setup it's roughly 2.5 times slower. To me it looks like this is caused by the getxattr call which is only present with vfs_fruit activated and introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s per listed

Hai, Can you tell the following that helps. OS ? Samba Version? ( pre-builded or source ) Kernel version? I think you need to wait for 4.9.4 if all patches ive seen on vfs_fruit are getting in. These might help. Go through bugzilla, you might find more about this here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]

I have been searching through the docs and on the web to no avail. I work at a university and we are moving our fileservers to new hardware. The problem is, nothing seems to integrate Mac's and Win box's happily. We have a large user base using samba already, but when mac's pick up the same share via CAP, CAP creates files to deal with the dual 'stream' nature of files from a

Hi, I’ve been searching online for a few days and am still hurting for an answer, otherwise I wouldn’t jump into a list and start asking questions straight away. We’re a 99% Mac shop running El Capitan (10.11.4). We’d been running Samba 4.2.3 on FreeBSD 10.0/ZFS for a while with minimal problems. I recently upgraded to 4.2.11 because of Badlock. Now when users create a new folder then try to

No comments on this one...? Did earlier versions of winbind go out to the PDC for information for each and every file that is listed in an explorer window? The is also a like delay in listing directory contents on the linux box (ie ls- al) ========================================== Hi all.. I apologies for the length. Run a very old Samba version (2.2.5 - Yes security problems) and winbind

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the

I'm having an issue with occasionally slow-running calls to normalizePath. If the path is a non-existent UNC path, then normalizePath sometimes takes 6 or 7 seconds to run, rather than its usual few microseconds. My big problem is that I can't reliably reproduce this across machines. The example below generates one or two slow runs out of 10000 on my Windows machine. I haven't been

In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong. % lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment "netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk. The first atom "org." is removed. source3/include/smb.h: /* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */ #define

anyone having, had, or even have any thoughts on the issue described below? its killing me.... The short description of the problem is: using direct to server UNC type paths, we see 'normal' speeds. Going threw a DFS (re)director, we see very bad performance from any machine running 3.0.*, but not 2.2.3a. We make heavy use of DFS. This service is on a machine named

I have a Samba share that I've created from a Linux box. I've mapped this sucessfully to drive in Windows 2003 server. I'm also able to read/write to it under Windows explorer just fine. It's using user security so I have to enter the username and password defined in the Linux box when connecting to this share. I then mapped a virtual directory under IIS to the UNC name of this

I'm hoping somebody can explain why I'm having this peculiar problem capturing quicktime video files with Final Cut Pro (running on OS X 10.3.4) and storing them on my Linux server. The Linux server has both Samba 3 and Netatalk 1.6.4. I have the server set up so that I can connect from the Mac to various Linux directories using either Samba or Netatalk. When I connect with

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >

Folks, FYI. -- John H Terpstra Email: jht@samba.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:47:50 +0000 (GMT) From: John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org> To: Malte Weber <m_weber@wiwa.de> Cc: samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: netatalk/samba On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Malte Weber wrote: > Hi John, > > I unfortunately wasn't able to attend SambaXP,

Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >> >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >>>> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Ralph Böhme: >>>>> iirc the only thing that is currently not

Kevin, Thanks for the reply and interest in this topic. Comments below. Regards Rob. > I did consider that but rejected it for 2 reasons... > > 1. Backup run time. We have a 4 hour window to run backups at night. > Using recycled directories significantly extended the backup run > time. The deletion time is eliminated but frankly, we have the other > 20 hours of the day

Reply-To: Hi When configuring samba there is an option to turn on netatalk-support. I did this, because we need to see the shared on both windows and mac, but I couln't see any difference in sambas behaviour. Netatalk stored the ressource-fork, and some files the Mac-Finder created in Directories calles ".AppleDouble". I hoped, that with netatalk-support samba would handle those

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:25:45PM -0700, tackyy wrote: > We’re a 99% Mac shop running El Capitan (10.11.4). We’d been running > Samba 4.2.3 on FreeBSD 10.0/ZFS for a while with minimal problems. I > recently upgraded to 4.2.11 because of Badlock. Now when users > create a new folder then try to move files into it the Finder hangs, > the user loses their connection to the server and

Hi HAT! Nice to meet you over here... ;) On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:30:45PM +0900, HAT wrote: > Hi. > I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. > I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with > Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. > The character ":" in EA name is wrong. > The EAs are not seen from clients. >

Am 13.05.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Reindl Harald via samba: > since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and > so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to > go get rid of netatalk these days? > > is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble > extended attributes which are *not* compatible