Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "samba-des has bad performance"
1998 Aug 30
1
The Empire Strikes Back
Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day.
But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are
indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves.
Can you guys point me to more material on the subject?
[]'s, Juan
> From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com>
>
>
1997 Aug 14
1
Samba & Daylight savings time (was Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29...)
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700
> From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
> To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com
> Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29...
> Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com>
>
> At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote:
> >I
1997 Jul 31
1
NT 4.0 Client and Win95 clients and browsing problems in general.
I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my
9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many
combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain
Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am
missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in
order to
1997 Dec 15
1
Problems with Self extracting zip files
Hi folks,
I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a
samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the
.exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all
(500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run
directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe
files, and also from any share
1997 Jul 30
2
SAMBA digest 1371
I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging
off of it as a client.
I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95
box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time.
(SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95
box couldn't ping the SCO box but I
1997 Aug 06
2
set unix time via samba
hi out there,
first of all: samba is pretty cool!
question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a
win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')?
cheers
jodok
;-----------------------------------
Jodok Sutterluety
Austria, Vienna
Tel: ++43 1 4080791
email: js@bonus.unterland.at
;-----------------------------------
1997 Aug 21
1
hosts allow - problem
Hello,
I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a
similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries:
[global]
hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122
workgroup = IMBNET
printing = SYSV
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd
share modes = yes
browseable = yes
....
1997 Aug 25
2
NT Workstation 4.0
I am getting a complaint that my Samba server running on Solaris 2.5
cannot be found from a user's PC running NT Workstation 4.0.
Any suggestions?
thanks,
garrett curtis
garrettc@eos.net
1997 Jul 29
1
Solved: NT 4.0 not connecting to SAMBA servers
We fixed our own problem. Turns out that server taber is at service pack 1
and hyde is at service pack 3. In service pack 3 the smb redirector doesn't
send unencrypted passwords without a registry entry to enable them. See
article Q166730 at www.microsoft.com for details.
This brings up another question. Is anyone out there using Samba with the
encrypted passwords from NT 4?
Ed Maple
UNIX
2004 Oct 22
2
automatically authenticate domain logged-on users in apache with AD/NTDOM?
Hi!
I don't use MS products at all, so I have very little knowledge with them,
but I believe Microsoft has as protocol where Internet Explorer can
automatically authenticate against an IIS server, and given that the server
and client are on the same NT domain, and the client user is logged in to
that domain, the user is automatically logged in without the need to give
away the password
2003 Jun 05
1
fxp0: device timeout | SCB already complete (me too)
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> #> Hi Shaun,
> #>
> #> Thanks for the input! Glad to hear I'm not the only one
> #>
> #> In my case, both the SCSI and NIC are integrated on the motherboard, so I
> #> cannot really move them around... :)
> #>
> #> Also, as I
1997 Aug 03
7
Print Share Name Length
Hi all,
We (the Samba Team) need some feed back from our user community.
Anyone want to help out? All you need to do is post us a one liner.
Tell us if you want 8 character length limited print share names or larger.
If you really must have longer print share names - then how many characters?
Should we limit the length?
Background:
>From time to time we receive patches to increase the maximum
1997 Dec 03
1
Problems with servicepack 3
Hello!
I read your notice about your problem with Windows NT and servicepack 3.
Did you find any solution?
I have the same problem: I can?t see other computers on the network when
I?m running SAMBA. I would appreciate if you could help me.
Leif Magnusson
1999 Jan 27
0
timeout_processing(795) -> smbd dies signal 8
Hi!
I'm having problems with a newly setup samba-2.0 (migrating from
1.9.18p10, which has served us extremely well).
I'm running the server as PDC. Too often, saving files (possibly other
actions, I'm not sure) takes forever and finally gives a timeout. The
server's child process dies signal 8 (see below). Also, the processes
die (same error messages and signal 8) during the
2007 Mar 04
2
BgDRb blocking in ActiveRecord
Hi Folks,
I''ve got a tiny little problem using MySQL-backed ActiveRecord in my
worker class. Sometimes it just blocks infinitely when I try to
access it. I don''t know whether it is in AR itself or in the SQL
driver. It just stops doing anything, logging nothing, no exceptions
are raised. I don''t know if it matters that I call the worker''s
methods via
2020 Oct 25
2
Socket is busy: Success?
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
8421/icecast2
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.159:8443 192.168.1.1:65003
ESTABLISHED 8421/icecast2
Den sön 25 okt. 2020 kl 18:42 skrev Kwame Bahena <informatux at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> What does the command
>
> sudo netstat -plant | grep 8443
>
> say?
>
> Cheers,
> --
>
2002 Dec 17
2
Still having trouble with copying large files
I had originally written about this problem last month
(http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-November/085418.html)
Since then, our company has added another Windows Fileserver which I'm
trying to back up, and they are both having the problem. Because it
happens on both servers, this leads me to believe it really is a problem
with my Samba server.
I've upgraded to 2.2.7a, as the
2002 May 23
1
$SMBDOPTIONS in xinetd.conf
hi list,
got a little trouble of understanding, how to convert from old
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb to the new version redhat 7.1
this is, what I should know :
the old version looks like this :
# see how we were called
case "$1" in
start)
if [ -s /etc/smb.conf ]; then
echo -n "starting $ident:
start-stop-daemon -S -n $Name1 -x $DAEMON1 - -D -d 2
start-stop-daemon -S -n
2020 Oct 25
2
Socket is busy: Success?
Both icecast and ices are on the same server.
Where shall i change to "localhost"?
/Daniel
Den sön 25 okt. 2020 kl 18:49 skrev Kwame Bahena <informatux at gmail.com>:
> Is your icecast server in another server?
> If not, if you are running ices on the same server as your icecast, try
> using localhost instead of "bananradion.bananklubben.se"
>
>
>
2020 Oct 17
2
Install Icecast server with SSL - please help
I tried that, but i'm not sure what´s supposed to happen after "make
install" is done?
Making install in examples
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/pi/icecast-2.4.4/examples'
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/pi/icecast-2.4.4/examples'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'.
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-data-am'.
make[2]: