similar to: samba-des has bad performance

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "samba-des has bad performance"

1998 Aug 30
1
The Empire Strikes Back
Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >
1997 Aug 14
1
Samba & Daylight savings time (was Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29...)
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: > >I
1997 Jul 31
1
NT 4.0 Client and Win95 clients and browsing problems in general.
I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my 9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in order to
1997 Dec 15
1
Problems with Self extracting zip files
Hi folks, I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the .exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share
1997 Jul 30
2
SAMBA digest 1371
I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I
1997 Aug 06
2
set unix time via samba
hi out there, first of all: samba is pretty cool! question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')? cheers jodok ;----------------------------------- Jodok Sutterluety Austria, Vienna Tel: ++43 1 4080791 email: js@bonus.unterland.at ;-----------------------------------
1997 Aug 21
1
hosts allow - problem
Hello, I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries: [global] hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122 workgroup = IMBNET printing = SYSV printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd share modes = yes browseable = yes ....
1997 Aug 25
2
NT Workstation 4.0
I am getting a complaint that my Samba server running on Solaris 2.5 cannot be found from a user's PC running NT Workstation 4.0. Any suggestions? thanks, garrett curtis garrettc@eos.net
1997 Jul 29
1
Solved: NT 4.0 not connecting to SAMBA servers
We fixed our own problem. Turns out that server taber is at service pack 1 and hyde is at service pack 3. In service pack 3 the smb redirector doesn't send unencrypted passwords without a registry entry to enable them. See article Q166730 at www.microsoft.com for details. This brings up another question. Is anyone out there using Samba with the encrypted passwords from NT 4? Ed Maple UNIX
2004 Oct 22
2
automatically authenticate domain logged-on users in apache with AD/NTDOM?
Hi! I don't use MS products at all, so I have very little knowledge with them, but I believe Microsoft has as protocol where Internet Explorer can automatically authenticate against an IIS server, and given that the server and client are on the same NT domain, and the client user is logged in to that domain, the user is automatically logged in without the need to give away the password
2003 Jun 05
1
fxp0: device timeout | SCB already complete (me too)
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Shaun Jurrens wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > #> Hi Shaun, > #> > #> Thanks for the input! Glad to hear I'm not the only one > #> > #> In my case, both the SCSI and NIC are integrated on the motherboard, so I > #> cannot really move them around... :) > #> > #> Also, as I
1997 Aug 03
7
Print Share Name Length
Hi all, We (the Samba Team) need some feed back from our user community. Anyone want to help out? All you need to do is post us a one liner. Tell us if you want 8 character length limited print share names or larger. If you really must have longer print share names - then how many characters? Should we limit the length? Background: >From time to time we receive patches to increase the maximum
1997 Dec 03
1
Problems with servicepack 3
Hello! I read your notice about your problem with Windows NT and servicepack 3. Did you find any solution? I have the same problem: I can?t see other computers on the network when I?m running SAMBA. I would appreciate if you could help me. Leif Magnusson
1999 Jan 27
0
timeout_processing(795) -> smbd dies signal 8
Hi! I'm having problems with a newly setup samba-2.0 (migrating from 1.9.18p10, which has served us extremely well). I'm running the server as PDC. Too often, saving files (possibly other actions, I'm not sure) takes forever and finally gives a timeout. The server's child process dies signal 8 (see below). Also, the processes die (same error messages and signal 8) during the
2007 Mar 04
2
BgDRb blocking in ActiveRecord
Hi Folks, I''ve got a tiny little problem using MySQL-backed ActiveRecord in my worker class. Sometimes it just blocks infinitely when I try to access it. I don''t know whether it is in AR itself or in the SQL driver. It just stops doing anything, logging nothing, no exceptions are raised. I don''t know if it matters that I call the worker''s methods via
2020 Oct 25
2
Socket is busy: Success?
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8421/icecast2 tcp 0 0 192.168.1.159:8443 192.168.1.1:65003 ESTABLISHED 8421/icecast2 Den sön 25 okt. 2020 kl 18:42 skrev Kwame Bahena <informatux at gmail.com>: > Hello, > > What does the command > > sudo netstat -plant | grep 8443 > > say? > > Cheers, > -- >
2002 Dec 17
2
Still having trouble with copying large files
I had originally written about this problem last month (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/2002-November/085418.html) Since then, our company has added another Windows Fileserver which I'm trying to back up, and they are both having the problem. Because it happens on both servers, this leads me to believe it really is a problem with my Samba server. I've upgraded to 2.2.7a, as the
2002 May 23
1
$SMBDOPTIONS in xinetd.conf
hi list, got a little trouble of understanding, how to convert from old /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb to the new version redhat 7.1 this is, what I should know : the old version looks like this : # see how we were called case "$1" in start) if [ -s /etc/smb.conf ]; then echo -n "starting $ident: start-stop-daemon -S -n $Name1 -x $DAEMON1 - -D -d 2 start-stop-daemon -S -n
2020 Oct 25
2
Socket is busy: Success?
Both icecast and ices are on the same server. Where shall i change to "localhost"? /Daniel Den sön 25 okt. 2020 kl 18:49 skrev Kwame Bahena <informatux at gmail.com>: > Is your icecast server in another server? > If not, if you are running ices on the same server as your icecast, try > using localhost instead of "bananradion.bananklubben.se" > > >
2020 Oct 17
2
Install Icecast server with SSL - please help
I tried that, but i'm not sure what´s supposed to happen after "make install" is done? Making install in examples make[1]: Entering directory '/home/pi/icecast-2.4.4/examples' make[2]: Entering directory '/home/pi/icecast-2.4.4/examples' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-exec-am'. make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'install-data-am'. make[2]: