similar to: Any Amiga Samba users?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Any Amiga Samba users?"

1997 Dec 16
1
Samba/Amiga smbclient?
Hi Rask, I installed the GG ls, as you suggested, and some other directory commands (rm, dir, ..) as well, into amitcp:samba/bin. BIN: is assigned to this. My path looks here first before amitcp:bin. I still get no action for mput *, with recurs on, and mask *. Also, lcd prints nothing as well. Can you suggest anything else? Am I missing something else, perhaps? Cheers, Chris. On 15 Dec 97
1997 Dec 08
1
Samba - Amiga, smbclient recurs problem
Hi All, I'm an Amiga user of samba. All is well with server and client except recursive mput within smbclient. It transfers nothing, and reports no errors. Can anyone help? My samba version is 1.9.16p9. More detail: I started with BIN: pointing to amitcp:samba/bin in which I placed sh, as recommended. I found without recurs set that mput #? (or mput *) reported that it could not find ls
1998 Mar 16
3
Amiga Samba file format?
Hi Amiga Samba users, I have an interesting problem using Samba (1.9.16) on the Amiga. Everthing works fine for PC reads from the Amiga to the PC or dag-and-dropped onto Unix shares (which also using Samba). However, in the other direction (i.e. at PC GUI drag a Unix file from Unix share and drop it onto an Amiga share) this copy results in a file that my httpd on the Amiga can't read (in the
1998 Apr 05
1
No subject
Hi, I am running Samba on an Amiga connected to a win95 network. It works just fine to browse around from explorer. But when I access the Amiga from an FTP-program all the Directorys on the Amiga shows up as plain files with the size 0(zero). I can not find anyplace to change it so that the Amiga shows it in a different way. Any suggestions? /Uwe Koch
1999 Jan 23
2
Digest Only?
Is this list only available in digest form only? I would like to receive individual postings so I can sort them by subject and just look at the ones I'm interested. I've subscribed to many lists, both listerv & majordomo, and I've only ever essage easier?seen one other list that was digest-only. Does *anyone* find scolling through a 40k message easier? -Ron Lavoie Ron Lavoie
1998 Oct 08
3
digest...
Hi I get this mailing-list as a digest (as everyone does, i guess). This is quite inconvinient for answering single questions.. I every digest there is a message with Subject: Re: Samba dingest <NR>... This makes it hard to keep track about whath message the replay is ment for. Another problem is, that mime-attachments don?t seem to work. This is especially bad, because some Microsoft
1998 Mar 28
4
unix password sync problems!
I have been trying for hours to get the unix password sync going properly with Samba 1.9.18p4 running on FreeBSD 2.2.5 I have compiled Samba with the ALLOW_CHANGE_PASSWORD option enabled. I created the smbpasswd file as ENCRYPTION.txt states, and can set passwords as root. However, when a user tries changing their password, it doesn't work. The error reported is:
2014 Jul 21
2
Getting NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) selinux is disabled. The following commands were all run on the RedHat Server on which I am running samba. *The following ports are open* 5 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:137 6 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:138 7 ACCEPT tcp --
1997 Dec 06
1
OS/2, DOS LanMan, Amiga and Solaris 2.4 patch for Samba
http://carol.wins.uva.nl/~leeuw/samba/fix.html What do you think about this ? It really works. > OS/2, DOS LanMan, Amiga and Solaris 2.4 patch for Samba > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This page contains a couple of patches (i.e. new features, bugfixes etc.) for the Samba source code. These will eventually be included in the next
1999 Jun 24
0
Connection PC - Amiga by means of Samba !
Hello there ! My Intention was to connect both the Amiga & PC to some sort of Network, and it had to be over the serial port, because Networkcards form Amiga are rather expensive. As I came up with this idea, I found some information from another person, who has already thried that, but said no word about installing samba. The connection worked, both computers can ping eachother over TCP/IP,
2005 Dec 30
2
BNT600AP
Hi, I have a little problem with PowerCom BNT600AP after running driver I see: root@rask> powercom -D /dev/ttyS1 Network UPS Tools - PowerCom and similars protocol UPS driver $ Revision: 0.5 $ (2.0.2) debug level is '1' Values of arguments: manufacturer : 'PowerCom' model name : 'Unknown' serial number : 'Unknown' line
2004 Oct 06
4
Checking if an element is part of a vector
Hi! I want to know if a given element <- ('c64') is part of a vector<- ('c64', 'amiga', 'atari'). Does a function exist for this which gives back a logical value? thankx db
2024 Mar 05
2
Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 20:10 -0500, Tygre via samba wrote: > Hi there, > I have looked for a solution to my problem on the Internet (and > in particular this mailing list), but couldn't find one, probably due > to searching for the wrong thing :-) > I have an RPI running Samba version 4.9.5-Debian. "pdbedit -L" > shows that the user "smbuser" exists. I
2024 Mar 09
3
Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client
Hi there, Sorry to come back to that, I tried to follow the code at https://github.com/samba-team/samba/blob/master/source3/auth/auth.c#L214 (and below) but I still can't understand why one Samba client can connect, but the other can't. I can't understand why, with one client, the code would go into "check_samsec.c:183" (and return "sam_account_ok") while, with
2024 Mar 05
1
Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client
Hi there, I have looked for a solution to my problem on the Internet (and in particular this mailing list), but couldn't find one, probably due to searching for the wrong thing :-) I have an RPI running Samba version 4.9.5-Debian. "pdbedit -L" shows that the user "smbuser" exists. I used "smbpassword" to set the password of "smbuser". I also have
1997 Jun 25
3
R-alpha: lbeta, ctrl-C and crashes
1. lbeta and beta do not work properly: lbeta returns its first argument and beta gives the lbeta result. In names.c lines 245-6, the codes for these should be 2 and 3 instead of 1 and 2 2. crtl-C does not work (except the first time) on Red Hat elf Linux (which has many many other problems as well) nor on the previous version of Linux for Amiga. It worked on Slackware aout Linux and now works
1997 Jun 25
3
R-alpha: lbeta, ctrl-C and crashes
1. lbeta and beta do not work properly: lbeta returns its first argument and beta gives the lbeta result. In names.c lines 245-6, the codes for these should be 2 and 3 instead of 1 and 2 2. crtl-C does not work (except the first time) on Red Hat elf Linux (which has many many other problems as well) nor on the previous version of Linux for Amiga. It worked on Slackware aout Linux and now works
2024 Mar 10
1
Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client
The logs below still look like Samba is configured for encrypted passwords. As to your other mail, please, please use a more recent version than Samba 4.9 Andrew Bartlett On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 15:37 -0500, Tygre via samba wrote: > Hi there, > Sorry to come back to that, I tried to follow the code at > https://github.com/samba-team/samba/blob/master/source3/auth/auth.c#L214 > (and
2024 Mar 10
1
Cannot Get Samba to Work Without Encrypted Password with Legacy Client
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 15:37:09 -0500 Tygre via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Sorry to come back to that, I tried to follow the code at > https://github.com/samba-team/samba/blob/master/source3/auth/auth.c#L214 > (and below) but I still can't understand why one Samba client can > connect, but the other can't. > > I can't
2008 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] compile linux kernel
Watching this thread, it occurs to me that the "V" in "LLVM" is creating confusion. So far as I know, LLVM is the first project to use "virtual" to refer to the instruction set of the intermediate form. I understand why this labeling made sense (sort of), but it was unfortunate. The machine is abstract, not virtual, and the use of "virtual" here is so out of