Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "How can I print from Unix to Wfwg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
1997 Oct 31
0
smbprint.sysv problem for printing from unix to WFWG
Dear users
Thanks for reading this. Hope you will help me.
I am using samba 1.9.17p2 on SunSparc-20 running solaris2.5.1 for
printing and file sharing with PC-network. File sharing is working
fine but I want to print to a WfWg printer from Solaris. So I have
used your script smbprint.sysv and try to print. But I am facing
following problems:
1-
1998 Apr 17
2
how to stop WfWG local browse master announcements?
this isn't strictly a samba question, but it is related in that i'm trying
to a samba server as my domain master browser and multiple samba servers
as local master browsers for a workgroup across multiple subnets.
everything seems to be working wonderfully except for one WfWG host
which does not show up in the browse list as expected. i notice that
this host is announcing itself as a
1999 Jul 19
2
cannot access samba from WfWg running trumpet winsock
Hi all!
Here is my problem: I have installed RedHat Linux version 6.0 on a
computer and I want to share its resources via samba. Unfortunately, my
computer - which is running WfWg 3.11 for Eastern Europe and the trumpet
winsock TCP/IP stack is not able to see the samba server. Other
computers, running Win95, Linux and WfWg with M$ TCP/IP stack perform
OK.
I have tried the following combinations:
2003 Nov 19
17
Samba Printing
Good Afternoon,
We recently added encrypted smb passwords to our site.
I just tried to add a printer to samba and it will not work.
I tried to connect to \\sambahost\printer and it will not connect.
All the older printers still work. I just wonder if there is an
extra step I need to perform now when I add printers?
Thanks for your time,
Bill
--
William M. Fennell
Network Administrator
1997 Oct 23
1
NT domain logon questions
Hi. Myself and a anti-Micro$oft companion tried to get
NT domain logons working yesterday and seem pretty close, but
not quite.
Samba is 1.9.18alpha3, server is an Ultra-2 running SunOS 5.5.1.
Encrypted passwords seem to be working, a la smbclient and mostly
from NT, "mostly" because it *seemed* to be working but we did
have some problems with home directories in smbpasswd changing
2016 Nov 16
1
BroadCom NIC not adding as PassThrough device
Hi Guys,
I am trying to add a Broadcom Physical NIC to a virtual Machine as
Passthrough device. However I am getting following error.
Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support
passthrough of host PCI devices
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 88, in
cb_wrapper
1998 Dec 04
1
AW: Windows 3.1 and Samba
Rudolf Kollien
email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de
Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de
***************************************************************************
Never trust a operating system you have no sources for
***************************************************************************
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
2018 May 01
1
4.2.14 (or newer) support "Windows for Workgroups 3.1a"?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 07:57:32PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
Hello Rowland.
> I understand about CNC, nobody thinks about the builtin PC going
> obsolete before the machine wears out, so you end up a machine that is
> virtually obsolete.
Exactly.
> If it does, then creating a VM to run a Unix domain member in, would be
> a good idea.
I will do it, security is never
1997 Oct 16
0
Samba / automounter
Hi folks,
in our group we're working with samba on a SunOS 4.1.3 workstation and
about 30 wfwg and win95 clients for several time without any trouble
(samba-1.9.16p6 release). Now i've installed version 1.9.17p2 and got the
following problem:
I can't reach directories on an automounted volume on the Server which is
not currently mounted by changing directory to that drive on the
1999 Aug 20
0
seg.fault for some illegal .Random.seed (new since 0.64) (PR#253)
This is already in 0.64, but was okay in 0.63
In R version <= 0.63 :
> .Random.seed <- c(111,2,3)
> rnorm(1)
Warning: Wrong length .Random.seed; forgot initial RNGkind? set to Wichmann-Hill
[1] -0.4811529
> .Random.seed
[1] 0 6968 28861 26054
>
Now in 0.65 (pre-release) and both versions of 0.64 :
> .Random.seed <- c(111,2,3)
1999 Oct 26
1
dodgy list operation (PR#298)
I can generate a segmentation fault as follows, where I would expect a
syntax error:
fred <- as.list(1:10)
lapply(fred, "[[")
platform sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
arch sparc
os solaris2.5.1
system sparc, solaris2.5.1
status
status.rev 0
major 0
minor 64.1
1999 Nov 23
1
as.name() is not idempotent (PR#337)
as.name(as.name("ss"))
gives an error in R (0.90 and earlier)
but should of course give the same as simply
as.name("ss")
This reminds me of similar bug/problem... which I don't recall.
Yes, I should build tests like these into "make test-Specific" ..
Martin
--please do not edit the information below--
Version:
platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
arch =
1998 Aug 04
0
SAMBA digest 1767
At 12:25 AM 8/4/98 +1000, you wrote:
> I setup the smbpasswd file as described in ENCRYPTION.txt (in
>the Samba documentation), and, as we are _only_ 12 users wanting to
>access the shares, gave everyone a simple initial samba password. Then I
>asked the NT4 users to login to the samba server (Linux 2.x, Samba
>1.9.18p8) as Unix users and change their samba password with the
2018 Mar 29
0
tftpd server S not responding
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request
>> RRQ.
>> >
>>
2002 Mar 12
0
Rsync2.5.3
Hi,
I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on my Solaris5.5.1 and Solaris5.8
machines, I got the following errors:
On Solaris5.5.1, I got:
gunbelt# ./configure
configure: loading cache /dev/null
configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.3
checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
checking for
1999 Jul 15
0
pch and mkh bug PR#225
I am sorry about the problem caused by my first attempt at reporting a
bug. This is a followup to my report PR#225, hopefully being more
useful. By not I have a better understanding of the problems being
reported.
I wish to report one bug relating to plot character and to mention two
other possible bugs (these may relate to differences between R and S)
I have noticed with R. We have recently
2000 May 19
1
system(.., ignore.stderr = TRUE) problem on Solaris (PR#547)
(i.e. my version Solaris, see below...)
Note that system() is not only implemented quite system-dependently
(which you'd very much expect!) but also Unix and Windows have quite
different arguments apart from the first two.
Hence all the following is ``Unix-only'' :
A user stumbled across this when using read.table.url(.) on a platform
where no "wget" is installed:
The
2018 Apr 12
0
tftpd server S not responding
have you checked that tftp is added to hosts.allow.
syslog may be reporting libwrap errors, libwrap is trcpwrappers
regards peter
On 11 April 2018 16:57:04 "Asif Iqbal" <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at
2018 Mar 29
2
tftpd server S not responding
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request
> RRQ.
> >
> > I do see the RRQ packets coming from A to S, but S never responds back
> from
> > a different port Y to A
2000 Jul 05
0
FW: PROBLEMS
> Mr. Andrew Tridgell:
>
> I have made a gallant attempt to install and make use of the Samba 2.0.7
> suite of disk-sharing utility software
> on my Sun E-3000 running Solaris 2.5.1. (You will probably think my
> attempt was not gallant enough
> since I'm not currently able to use the package. Sorry...)
>
> While we are a City, and have a substantial desktop