similar to: How can I print from Unix to Wfwg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "How can I print from Unix to Wfwg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

1997 Oct 31
0
smbprint.sysv problem for printing from unix to WFWG
Dear users Thanks for reading this. Hope you will help me. I am using samba 1.9.17p2 on SunSparc-20 running solaris2.5.1 for printing and file sharing with PC-network. File sharing is working fine but I want to print to a WfWg printer from Solaris. So I have used your script smbprint.sysv and try to print. But I am facing following problems: 1-
1998 Apr 17
2
how to stop WfWG local browse master announcements?
this isn't strictly a samba question, but it is related in that i'm trying to a samba server as my domain master browser and multiple samba servers as local master browsers for a workgroup across multiple subnets. everything seems to be working wonderfully except for one WfWG host which does not show up in the browse list as expected. i notice that this host is announcing itself as a
1999 Jul 19
2
cannot access samba from WfWg running trumpet winsock
Hi all! Here is my problem: I have installed RedHat Linux version 6.0 on a computer and I want to share its resources via samba. Unfortunately, my computer - which is running WfWg 3.11 for Eastern Europe and the trumpet winsock TCP/IP stack is not able to see the samba server. Other computers, running Win95, Linux and WfWg with M$ TCP/IP stack perform OK. I have tried the following combinations:
2003 Nov 19
17
Samba Printing
Good Afternoon, We recently added encrypted smb passwords to our site. I just tried to add a printer to samba and it will not work. I tried to connect to \\sambahost\printer and it will not connect. All the older printers still work. I just wonder if there is an extra step I need to perform now when I add printers? Thanks for your time, Bill -- William M. Fennell Network Administrator
1997 Oct 23
1
NT domain logon questions
Hi. Myself and a anti-Micro$oft companion tried to get NT domain logons working yesterday and seem pretty close, but not quite. Samba is 1.9.18alpha3, server is an Ultra-2 running SunOS 5.5.1. Encrypted passwords seem to be working, a la smbclient and mostly from NT, "mostly" because it *seemed* to be working but we did have some problems with home directories in smbpasswd changing
2016 Nov 16
1
BroadCom NIC not adding as PassThrough device
Hi Guys, I am trying to add a Broadcom Physical NIC to a virtual Machine as Passthrough device. However I am getting following error. Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: host doesn't support passthrough of host PCI devices Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/asyncjob.py", line 88, in cb_wrapper
1998 Dec 04
1
AW: Windows 3.1 and Samba
Rudolf Kollien email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de *************************************************************************** Never trust a operating system you have no sources for *************************************************************************** Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
2018 May 01
1
4.2.14 (or newer) support "Windows for Workgroups 3.1a"?
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 07:57:32PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: Hello Rowland. > I understand about CNC, nobody thinks about the builtin PC going > obsolete before the machine wears out, so you end up a machine that is > virtually obsolete. Exactly. > If it does, then creating a VM to run a Unix domain member in, would be > a good idea. I will do it, security is never
1997 Oct 16
0
Samba / automounter
Hi folks, in our group we're working with samba on a SunOS 4.1.3 workstation and about 30 wfwg and win95 clients for several time without any trouble (samba-1.9.16p6 release). Now i've installed version 1.9.17p2 and got the following problem: I can't reach directories on an automounted volume on the Server which is not currently mounted by changing directory to that drive on the
1999 Aug 20
0
seg.fault for some illegal .Random.seed (new since 0.64) (PR#253)
This is already in 0.64, but was okay in 0.63 In R version <= 0.63 : > .Random.seed <- c(111,2,3) > rnorm(1) Warning: Wrong length .Random.seed; forgot initial RNGkind? set to Wichmann-Hill [1] -0.4811529 > .Random.seed [1] 0 6968 28861 26054 > Now in 0.65 (pre-release) and both versions of 0.64 : > .Random.seed <- c(111,2,3)
1999 Oct 26
1
dodgy list operation (PR#298)
I can generate a segmentation fault as follows, where I would expect a syntax error: fred <- as.list(1:10) lapply(fred, "[[") platform sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 arch sparc os solaris2.5.1 system sparc, solaris2.5.1 status status.rev 0 major 0 minor 64.1
1999 Nov 23
1
as.name() is not idempotent (PR#337)
as.name(as.name("ss")) gives an error in R (0.90 and earlier) but should of course give the same as simply as.name("ss") This reminds me of similar bug/problem... which I don't recall. Yes, I should build tests like these into "make test-Specific" .. Martin --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 arch =
1998 Aug 04
0
SAMBA digest 1767
At 12:25 AM 8/4/98 +1000, you wrote: > I setup the smbpasswd file as described in ENCRYPTION.txt (in >the Samba documentation), and, as we are _only_ 12 users wanting to >access the shares, gave everyone a simple initial samba password. Then I >asked the NT4 users to login to the samba server (Linux 2.x, Samba >1.9.18p8) as Unix users and change their samba password with the
2018 Mar 29
0
tftpd server S not responding
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request >> RRQ. >> > >>
2002 Mar 12
0
Rsync2.5.3
Hi, I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on my Solaris5.5.1 and Solaris5.8 machines, I got the following errors: On Solaris5.5.1, I got: gunbelt# ./configure configure: loading cache /dev/null configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.3 checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 checking for
1999 Jul 15
0
pch and mkh bug PR#225
I am sorry about the problem caused by my first attempt at reporting a bug. This is a followup to my report PR#225, hopefully being more useful. By not I have a better understanding of the problems being reported. I wish to report one bug relating to plot character and to mention two other possible bugs (these may relate to differences between R and S) I have noticed with R. We have recently
2000 May 19
1
system(.., ignore.stderr = TRUE) problem on Solaris (PR#547)
(i.e. my version Solaris, see below...) Note that system() is not only implemented quite system-dependently (which you'd very much expect!) but also Unix and Windows have quite different arguments apart from the first two. Hence all the following is ``Unix-only'' : A user stumbled across this when using read.table.url(.) on a platform where no "wget" is installed: The
2018 Apr 12
0
tftpd server S not responding
have you checked that tftp is added to hosts.allow. syslog may be reporting libwrap errors, libwrap is trcpwrappers regards peter On 11 April 2018 16:57:04 "Asif Iqbal" <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at
2018 Mar 29
2
tftpd server S not responding
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:16 PM Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > It is not respoding to A server which is sending the tftp read request > RRQ. > > > > I do see the RRQ packets coming from A to S, but S never responds back > from > > a different port Y to A
2000 Jul 05
0
FW: PROBLEMS
> Mr. Andrew Tridgell: > > I have made a gallant attempt to install and make use of the Samba 2.0.7 > suite of disk-sharing utility software > on my Sun E-3000 running Solaris 2.5.1. (You will probably think my > attempt was not gallant enough > since I'm not currently able to use the package. Sorry...) > > While we are a City, and have a substantial desktop