similar to: Samba performance

I read in the Samba docs that there is a problem with "utime()" when a user updates another users file the modified time cannot be updated. According to the docs, even if it the file has write permissions set for the non-owner. When I attempt to do a test on a files that is mode 777, I create the file as one user, wait a minute, edit it again as another user, and it changes the modified

How do i unsubscribe??

I know that the S Mailing list recently moved but am not sure where. I recently moved and would like to resubscribe to the S Mailing list. Could someone send me the latest info on subscribing? Thanks! Jeff jmorris at cldx.com -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

I know that the S Mailing list recently moved but am not sure where. I recently moved and would like to resubscribe to the S Mailing list. Could someone send me the latest info on subscribing? Thanks! Jeff jmorris at cldx.com -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

Hi All, I am experiencing issues with the use of DBase files on a Samba 2.0.5a share, that appear to be due to locking problems. Basically, I have test programs for both DOS and Win32 that does nothing but append records to a DBase database (DBF/MDX files). If more than one client PC is appending to this file, data loss occurs. I get random data loss, with records lost, and index file

Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ? include/asm/paravirt.h: static inline void setup_boot_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock(); } static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock(); } (via the vmi timer patch). - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Why are these APIC clock init hooks dependent on CONFIG_X86_PAE ? include/asm/paravirt.h: static inline void setup_boot_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_boot_clock(); } static inline void setup_secondary_clock(void) { paravirt_ops.setup_secondary_clock(); } (via the vmi timer patch). - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

1) Bridging via host is broken: we need to set "promisc" bit in MAC address published by the host so the guest sends us everything. Thanks James Morris for the report (I don't use bridging). 2) Lguest network device uses 0 to mean "noone at this slot". It used to use 0xFF, and one spot was missed. Minor: it just means we'll have a useless extra transmit

1) Bridging via host is broken: we need to set "promisc" bit in MAC address published by the host so the guest sends us everything. Thanks James Morris for the report (I don't use bridging). 2) Lguest network device uses 0 to mean "noone at this slot". It used to use 0xFF, and one spot was missed. Minor: it just means we'll have a useless extra transmit

Currently, 020-paravirt-xen.patch contains inconsistent declarations for a bunch of native_read/write functions. This patch updates the declarations to use unsigned long for register values. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff -purN -X dontdiff

Currently, 020-paravirt-xen.patch contains inconsistent declarations for a bunch of native_read/write functions. This patch updates the declarations to use unsigned long for register values. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff -purN -X dontdiff

lguest needs to hold a reference to its task in case it exits while another Guest is sending it I/O. Otherwise we can oops in access_process_vm->get_task_mm->task_lock(). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> --- drivers/lguest/lguest_user.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) ===================================================================

Hello all, I have a samba 2.2.1a server running as the PDC of my network on a Mandrake 8.0 system with a reiserFS partition. I am serving for the win98 clients a small DOS clipper program with a DBF database. The programs run well on the workstations when there is only one user using it, when another user try to use the same program it starts to get very slow. I think this is a lock

Hi How can i know the version of my vpmadt032 firmware? Thanks Ruben

Hi I just want to know if anyone have problems with server DELL 1600, Like: Hangup Call. Thanks Ruben

At http://namei.org/misc/lguest/patches/time/v02/ Current status: - Resync to recent upstream lguest patch queue - Rudimentary clock event device is working, but with a significant performance hit - Old TSC code included, still needs to be modified to handle freq change Next: - Check for pending interrupts after they're enabled again per suggestion from Rusty. -- James Morris

At http://namei.org/misc/lguest/patches/time/v02/ Current status: - Resync to recent upstream lguest patch queue - Rudimentary clock event device is working, but with a significant performance hit - Old TSC code included, still needs to be modified to handle freq change Next: - Check for pending interrupts after they're enabled again per suggestion from Rusty. -- James Morris

I am submitting the command: calcium<-read.table("calcium.txt",header=TRUE) and with Rw0630 and Bdr0631 I get an application error and R crashes. But the command works fine with rjune. I am running under NT4.0 Anyone have a similar problem? Jeff jmorris at ocdus.jnj.com -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

>From the <samba>/var/log/<client>.log file: doing parameter domain controller = AZPHXNT01 Unknown parameter encountered: "domain controller" Ignoring unknown parameter "domain controller" >From the smb.conf file: # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use

Hi all, Some of you know I've been working on a trivial in-kernel hypervisor to demonstrate paravirt_ops. The good news is that it works! (And not just for me!) The bad news is that I haven't written any documentation and now I'm going to be offline (moving to a farm) for several weeks. Nonetheless, if you're the kind of person who wants to poke around with hypervisors, no