similar to: SAMBA digest 1371

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: > >I

hi out there, first of all: samba is pretty cool! question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')? cheers jodok ;----------------------------------- Jodok Sutterluety Austria, Vienna Tel: ++43 1 4080791 email: js@bonus.unterland.at ;-----------------------------------

I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my 9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in order to

Hi folks, I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the .exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share

Hello, I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries: [global] hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122 workgroup = IMBNET printing = SYSV printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd share modes = yes browseable = yes ....

I am getting a complaint that my Samba server running on Solaris 2.5 cannot be found from a user's PC running NT Workstation 4.0. Any suggestions? thanks, garrett curtis garrettc@eos.net

We fixed our own problem. Turns out that server taber is at service pack 1 and hyde is at service pack 3. In service pack 3 the smb redirector doesn't send unencrypted passwords without a registry entry to enable them. See article Q166730 at www.microsoft.com for details. This brings up another question. Is anyone out there using Samba with the encrypted passwords from NT 4? Ed Maple UNIX

Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape

Hi all, We (the Samba Team) need some feed back from our user community. Anyone want to help out? All you need to do is post us a one liner. Tell us if you want 8 character length limited print share names or larger. If you really must have longer print share names - then how many characters? Should we limit the length? Background: >From time to time we receive patches to increase the maximum

Hello! I read your notice about your problem with Windows NT and servicepack 3. Did you find any solution? I have the same problem: I can?t see other computers on the network when I?m running SAMBA. I would appreciate if you could help me. Leif Magnusson

I get a no logon servers available message. Does this mean that my samba server isn't setup as a PDC or is there something else? I get this message when trying to access user level shares on a Win'95 machine from another win'95 machine. THANKS!

Hello everyone - I just upgraded from Samba 1.9.16p9 to 2.0.6 last week. Samba is running on my Digital UNIX 4.0E (aka Tru64 aka OSF1) workstation, and I have various Win'95, Win'98, and NT 4.0 (SP4 & SP6) computers accessing the Samba shares. One share is read-only, and one is read/write to specific users (I've included my smb.conf file below). If a users accesses the

Is there anyway to ascertain what shares a client actually has mounted at a given time? I've got a number of WFW boxes connecting shared drives on my SCO-OSE3 box using SAMBA 1.9.16p5 (upgrading to latest version RSN). I've got some shell scripts on the Unix box which use escape sequences sent to the client telnet to start programs on the client side. Some of these programs assume

Hi, WOW, this was posted over a year ago! A response now. The problem still exists. As reconfirmed in a post i read not to long ago (within the last 2 weeks?). HP jetdirect cards can only do one thing at a time. (HP has been writing Jetdirect firmware for 5 years, PLEASE HP you _MUST_ have the ability to fix it?! Or don't you??) This can be confirmed if you have an NT only shop. In the

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As you all may know Fyodor of nmap fame has terminated SCO's rights to distribute namp with its products. See: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/27/1077676955381.html I know this is off-topic, but I am interested in opinions on the subject of SCO using Samba in it's products while they declare the GPL is unconstitutional and invalid.

Hello all, I have a recently discovered problem. It's creating a crisis. Most of my local GL is in Quicken. The Quicken data directory i on a Samba share on one of my Linux boxen. I am running p11. I use "force user" and "force group" to make sure that any entries are made under the same permissions and uuid. The "ledger" directory is shared out to two

Hello: I wonder if I could get a little help with random sampling in R. I have a vector of length 7375. I would like to draw 3 distinct random samples, each of length 100 without replacement. I have tried the following: d1 <- 1:7375 set.seed(7) i <- sample(d1, 100, replace=F) s1 <- sort(d1[i]) s1 d2 <- d1[-i] set.seed(77) j <- sample(d2, 100, replace=F) s2 <- sort(d2[j])

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want