similar to: Updated Windos 95 Drivers to Correct Samba issuess.

Previus Post Andr?s Yacopino ayacopino at acasalud.com.ar Mon May 9 13:43:51 GMT 2005 a.. Previous message: [Samba] samba and domain local groups b.. Next message: [Samba] login on WinNT and 9X c.. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Good Morning, I have the some problem mapping

Hi all Does anyone know if i can use ethernet aliases like eth0:1 in advanced routing like multipath routing in order to avoid to have nxEthernet interfaces in my Linux box. Thansk in advanced -- Guillermo Gomez <ggomez@neotechgw.net> neotech _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

I am running Samba on a Red Hat 7.2 server. I shared a Epson Stylus C80 printer as the instructions collected in many How-To's teached me. The printer is working, but the print job stated from windows 98 clients takes to much time to get the server. The job is around 5 megabytes in size and takes 2 to 3 minutes to get the server. One file with same size takes 20 seconds to be copied from

Hi, we have a strange problem with a win 10 system. The windows system is using network shares exported from a linux system running samba 4.8. ~250 people are using the shares without any problem. This server is running automatically some mysql queries. The results of the queries are written to a file on the share. 1 or 2 times (from 10) this will fail. We only get an error like "file not

Hi all, there is a problem with the 'Default: nt smb support = yes' option in smb.conf for at least Samba 2.2.3a and 2.2.4 (on FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE) when using Netbench 7.0.2 on WXP or W2k clients. If the client is set to run 2+ Netbench engines (to simulate 2+ real clients) and 'nt smb support = yes', all but one engine fail pretty quickly, usually during a movefile oder

Hello I was wondering why there doesn't seem to a Windows version of Zaptel, making the Digium and its clones unavailable for a Windows PBX. Is the Zaptel/Zapata combo too *nix-centric? Thanks.