similar to: No more mails

The "merge" command is creating duplicate column names in a dataframe that is the result of the merge. The following is the 'merge' command: x <- merge(invType , allocSlots , by.x = 'index' , by.y = 'indx' , all.x = TRUE ) The 'invType' dataframe was the result of a previous merge and has the following column names that are

Hello, If an ordinary user runs: -- snip -- cat > starv.c <<EOF main(){ char *point; while(1) { point = ( char * ) malloc(10000); }} EOF cc starv.c while true do ./a.out & done -- snip -- This will fast starv the operating system (FreeBSD 6.2). I have tried to limit the number of processes and the amount of memmory consumed (in login.conf). There is also a file /etc/malloc.conf

> On 02 August 2018 at 16:22 Henrik Larsson <dovecot-user at spambox.dk> wrote: > > > On 02-08-2018 15:16, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 02 August 2018 at 16:08 Henrik Larsson <dovecot-user at spambox.dk> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 15-07-2018 11:42, Henrik Larsson wrote: > >> > After upgrading Dovecot to 2.3.2.1

I still see the issue below. Is there anyone running separate LMTP logging that could check if they experience the same issue? Best regards Henrik Larsson -------- Original Message -------- Subject: "doveadm log reopen" don't reopen separate lmtp log Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:23:49 +0200 From: Henrik Larsson <dovecot-user at spambox.dk> To: dovecot at dovecot.org Dear all

> On 02 August 2018 at 16:08 Henrik Larsson <dovecot-user at spambox.dk> wrote: > > > On 15-07-2018 11:42, Henrik Larsson wrote: > > After upgrading Dovecot to 2.3.2.1 and Pigeonhole to 0.5.2, > > managesieve stopped working. > > > > I'm using FreeBSD ports tree, to build these. Only domains have been > > modified in below output. > >

Now I have some access problems. This is what ends up un messages Hosts.allow is set to accept anyone on the local net. Username and passwords are the same Upsc gives proper output. System is Centos 6.8 Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upscode2[10113]: Startup successful Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upsd[10116]: listening on ::1 port 3493 Jul 22 17:20:06 BIFROST upsd[10116]: listening on 192.168.0.1 port 3493

Hi there. I need some advise on how to configure NUT, if it is possible to do it. My UPS, a Compaq R3000 has three individual power segments. I want NUT to: When mains is interrupted. Shut down all serves immediately. When all servers are completely down, in sequence with time delay shut down two of the power segments. When batteries is about to be depleted shut down itself and the last power

On 02-08-2018 15:16, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 02 August 2018 at 16:08 Henrik Larsson <dovecot-user at spambox.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >> On 15-07-2018 11:42, Henrik Larsson wrote: >> > After upgrading Dovecot to 2.3.2.1 and Pigeonhole to 0.5.2, >> > managesieve stopped working. >> > >> > I'm using FreeBSD ports tree, to build

On 12/3/17 8:56 PM, Josef Larsson wrote: > Sure, I can easily split it into two commits, but I would like to have > an OK on the actual code changes before splitting the patch. > > Best regards, > > Josef Larsson > > > On 2017-11-11 01:05, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >> On 11/10/17 7:49 PM, Josef Larsson wrote: >>> Accept 3d controllers and not only VGA

I've discussed it with Ben and we actually found a better solution. There are just some calls inside those functions which should get NULL checks, nv50_mstm_register_connector and nv50_mstm_destroy_connector. Or at least something similiar so that the code doesn't depent on the fbcon object being there. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Josef Larsson <josef.lar at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi List. I have an old Compaq 3000 (Eaton 5119). It is running servers, disk-arrays, one workstation etc. I am planning to install NUT (master) on a headless CENTOS 6.8 system. Connect the UPS with seral cable. Now my main question is, Does NUT support the power segments on the UPS. My intention is to be able to take down the system in an ordered way before the batteries are exhausted. I.e 5 mins

On 14 December 2017 11:55:35 p.m. GMT+01:00, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >On 14 December 2017 at 23:45, Tobias Klausmann ><tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >> >> On 12/3/17 8:56 PM, Josef Larsson wrote: >>> >>> Sure, I can easily split it into two commits, but I would like to >have >>> an OK on the actual code

I have a problem with some functions handling dates, in packages 'date' and 'survival' (they seem to be identical). For instance, from the documentation, -------------------- mdy.date {survival} R Documentation Convert to Julian Dates Description Given a month, day, and year, returns the number of days since January 1, 1960. Usage mdy.date(month, day, year, nineteen = TRUE,

I want to configure dovecot in FC 4. Set the "protocols = Imap Imaps Pop3 Pop3s" in dovecot.conf Test the service by giving "service dovecot start" command and finally I got "Starting Dovecot Imap [FAILED]" Can somebody explain WHY? Saman ---------------------------------------------------

On Jul 22, 2017, at 4:13 AM, Tomas Larsson <tomas.larsson at enrad.se> wrote: > > I am planning to install NUT (master) on a headless CENTOS 6.8 system. > Connect the UPS with seral cable. It looks like this might be using the upscode2 driver (UPScode-II protocol), right? > Now my main question is, Does NUT support the power segments on the UPS. > My intention is to be able

Dear all I have setup separate pop3/imap log "/var/log/dovecot" and lmtp delivery log "/var/log/dovecot-deliver". After rotating logfiles, i run "doveadm log reopen". I see that my pop3/imap log "/var/log/dovecot" is used straight away, but my lmpt log "/var/log/dovecot-deliver" isn't used at first. After some time, usually a few minutes,

On 15-07-2018 11:42, Henrik Larsson wrote: > After upgrading Dovecot to 2.3.2.1 and Pigeonhole to 0.5.2, > managesieve stopped working. > > I'm using FreeBSD ports tree, to build these. Only domains have been > modified in below output. > > A FreeBSD bug report have also been created. But I'm not sure if this > is FreeBSD ports related or Dovecot/Pigeonhole

Hello, I'm trying to use coxph() function to fit a very simple Cox proportional hazards regression model (only one covariate) but the parameter space is restricted to an open set (0, 1). Can I still obtain a valid estimate by using coxph function in this scenario? If yes, how? Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 14 December 2017 at 23:45, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: > > On 12/3/17 8:56 PM, Josef Larsson wrote: >> >> Sure, I can easily split it into two commits, but I would like to have >> an OK on the actual code changes before splitting the patch. I'm not actually sure this is a good idea still. As I recall, part of the purpose

Sure, I can easily split it into two commits, but I would like to have an OK on the actual code changes before splitting the patch. Best regards, Josef Larsson On 2017-11-11 01:05, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > On 11/10/17 7:49 PM, Josef Larsson wrote: >> Accept 3d controllers and not only VGA controllers. According to Ilia >> Mirkin, >> the VGA controller check should be