similar to: db.diff

Hello, I use rsync (3.0.9) to make backups with the link-dest option, so that I keep daily folders, and I only upload the difference. However, when a directory is moved somewhere else in the tree, it is fully re-uploaded. Same thing when files are simply renamed, they are re-uploaded, not linked. First option could be to use --fuzzy twice (migrating to 3.1.0), but I think that it can be very IO

I've put some thought into adding DB support to rsync (in a future release). This would allow it to maintain some extra information about files and be able to lookup information rapidly. This would support things like caching of checksum information, finding files to hard-link with, saving file attributes separately from the files (allowing non-root preservation of full file attributes as

Thank you so much Johannes. Problem now sorted: sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys E084DAB9 sudo add-apt-repository deb https://cran.ma.imperial.ac.uk/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ # replaced the old repository link sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install r-base r-base-core r-base-dev With my .Renviron file already fixed from previously with the correct paths inserted, my

On 6/30/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > checksum-xattr.diff > Log Message: > A simple patch that lets rsync use cached checksum values stored in > each file's extended attributes. A perl script is provided to create > and update the values. Wayne, You should be aware of two drawbacks of caching checksums in xattrs: First,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10555 Summary: checksum-reading.diff causes rsync to segfault with large amount of files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:08:32PM +0200, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote: > I have a user reporting the following error during recoll indexing: > > flush() failed: Db block overwritten - are there multiple writers? > > "flush() failed" is from recoll, the rest is, I think the text of the Xapian > exception. > > This is with Xapian 1.4.3 on Linux (I asked for

Hi everybody, Until know i synchronized a few directories full of binaries with "--checksum" options, it took each time a lot of time since rsync "mdsum" each file contained in my directories. Then I decided to skip "--checksum" option to let rsync work only of files size and files mtime and speed up the process but when i launch a dry-run : rsync wants to

Am Donnerstag, 27. April 2017, 15:05:32 schrieb J C Nash: > Is there a reason for jessie-cran3 rather than xenial? For Linux Mint 18 > (admittedly not 18.1) I have > > deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/ > > as one of the apt entries. > > JN Seconded. You should not expect that mixing apt entries for Ubuntu and Debian will work. > > It

With rsync-patches/md5p8.diff and --enable-xxhash % gdb --args ./rsync --version Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". rsync version v3.2.3-29-ge55788bd protocol version 31 Copyright (C) 1996-2020 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: https://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 64-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,

wayne. Thanks your explanation, how about MD4 (rsync protocal <30)? any comment would be appreciated!! Thanks again. Yadi On 05/12/2015 05:19 AM, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:50 AM, yhu2 <yadi.hu at windriver.com > <mailto:yadi.hu at windriver.com>> wrote: > > whether or not CVE-2014-8242 affects rsync? any commnet would be >

Olly Betts writes: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:08:32PM +0200, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote: > > I have a user reporting the following error during recoll indexing: > > > > flush() failed: Db block overwritten - are there multiple writers? > > > > "flush() failed" is from recoll, the rest is, I think the text of the Xapian > > exception.

Hi. I''ve not seen anything on this so thought I''d put forward the idea and see if it has any merit, or is already in practice. When using migrations with config.active_record.schema_format = :ruby (ruby as the canonical DB definition) it seems there would be no need to query the database itself to determine its structure; it would already be known. This might have some good

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:50 AM, yhu2 <yadi.hu at windriver.com> wrote: > whether or not CVE-2014-8242 affects rsync? any commnet would be > appreciated!! > Yes. It would be extremely hard for someone to trigger that via indirect means (such as inserting DB data and managing to match a checksum record boundary in contents somehow). So, it has a very small potential to cause a

Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync??? I was just talking to livevault.com & they (only on win boxes) say they can grab changes from a client's live DB & sync them remotely. It sounded like BS to me, but I'm neither a DB guy or sync'ing expert. Steve Mallett

Hi Suppose one has a db to track bookmarks for multiple users. Let''s assume that there are ten''s of thousands of users, and that an average user may have 100 bookmarks. (Assume here that no two bookmarks are the same.) Is it a common practice to have a bookmark table for ALL users, thereby producing a table that has on order one million rows. Or, is it better to somehow group

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2131 Summary: Create db files for local/remote directory listing Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: nkat@forthnet.gr

I'm trying to understand the point of the --checksum-seed option. As I understand it from a little reading, checksums are not cached over executions of rsync. So...what is the point of fixing the seed? Is this in support of patches which *do* support caching of checksums? I've read about caching these in files and in xaddr. Is there a "best solution" for caching

You really don't need openssl for that. And the fingerprints are simple. Here is a python script that do the same as ssh-keygen -fl /path/to/key : #!/usr/bin/env python3 import binascii import hashlib import sys if __name__ == "__main__": key = binascii.a2b_base64(sys.argv[1]) if sys.argv[2] == "md5": m = hashlib.new("md5")

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8659 Summary: link-by-hash.diff: Fix error when running without --link-by-hash Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

I've had to set up an iptables filter to drop packets originating from ports 32944, 33169 and 33171 on a samba 3 server as broadcast 'storms' lasting ~3seconds have intermittently been taking down all net communication. Can anyone shed any light on this? The packet capured in ethereal is below. Lee Baker Sorry for not trimming - not sure what's important: No. Time