similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7953] New: -x flag prevents symlink on source filesystem from overwriting dest dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746 Summary: file from link-dest-source is copies and not linked for identical files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8057 Summary: -x negates --force Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at liquidbinary.com QAContact:

Hi R-users, I have this code to uniformise the data using gamma: > length(dp1) [1] 696 > dim(dp1) [1] 58 12 > dim(ahall) [1]  1 12 > dim(bhall) [1]  1 12 > trans_dt <- function(dt,a,b) + { n1 <- ncol(dt) +   n2 <- length(dt) +   trans  <- vector(mode='numeric', length=n2) +   dim(trans) <- dim(dt) +   for (i in 1:n1) +   {  dt[,i] <- as.vector(dt[,i])

Hi R-users,   I would like to transform my data using gamma, my data are ahll, bhall and dp1 as shown below:   > ahall      ah1  ah2  ah3  ah4  ah5  ah6  ah7  ah8  ah9 ah10 ah11 ah12 [1,] 0.9 1.01 1.24 1.85 1.85 2.45 3.67 3.02 3.06 2.33 1.86 0.96   > bhall        bh1   bh2   bh3   bh4  bh5   bh6   bh7   bh8   bh9  bh10  bh11  bh12 [1,] 48.39 44.26 37.34 29.93 33.5 26.54 20.26 25.73 20.14

Hello all, I'm not sure if this is a bug. It's probably just an upgrade note. In summary I had no namespace section in my 2.0.17 config. When trying out 2.1rc5 no user could login because of a namespace error. 2.1rc5 adds a default namespace clause which broke my logins (It was noted in the changelog) I seemed to fix it by just putting this in the config file: namespace inbox {

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7668 Summary: Add --omit-symlink-times option, same purpose as --omit- dir-times Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi all, I''ve just started using tags but I''m struggling to apply the whole catalogue once some default tags are specified in puppet.conf. It looks like I should be able to do ''puppetd --test --tags main'' to apply the whole config but classes included via an inherited node definition (basenode for example) don''t get applied. I''m assuming this

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Bug ID: 11545 Summary: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi all, Being a rsync newbie, I wanted to use rsync for frequent backups that should only contain the changes. First I made copy of the important partition of the remote PC ("gany") using dd and mounted the resulting local file using a loop device under /mnt/gany. Then I tried: rsync -Haziv --compare-dest=/mnt/gany/lib --compare-dest=/data/A/gany.1 \ root@gany:/lib/ /data/A/gany.1

Hello all, I have a question. The man page of rsync: SYNOPSIS rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST R?SUM? DES OPTIONS --backup-dir effectue des sauvegardes dans ce r?pertoire What is the difference between 'DEST' and the rsync option '--backup-dir='? Thank you very much. paco

Hello, Say one starts with creating an archive rsync work -> archive and periodically (below, i = 1 to N) does rsync --backup-dir=a_<i> work -> archive and rsync --compare-dest=archive work -> b_<i> Then suppose one wants to recover the work directory as it was at time k. Using the b_<i> directories, one would merely merge

Hi, To do incremental backups I am presently using --backup-dir=/backup/host/$TODAY and the full backup is written to /backup/host/current. With this system incremental directories only contain deleted files and "current" contains the full backup. Would it be more efficient to use --link-dest=/backup/host/$YESTERDAY and write the main backup to /backup/host/$TODAY ? That way each

Hi, I would like to compare a backup dir with a directory list in --compare-dest= but I don't know how to specify this list. If a have only one dir it's ok, but if I have 2 or more dir I have an error ? Here is my script: #!/bin/bash SSH_USER= SSH_HOST= TOBCK=/ EXCLUDES=/root/bckscript/ns200176/excludes LOG=/root/bckscript/ns200176/rsync_$(date +'%Y-%m-%d_%H.%M.S').log

Hi, I encountered this behavor when switching my excludes from global exclude filter rules to dir-merge rules. If the spezified DEST directory has a trailing dot dir the exclude filter rule "exclude /foobar" inherited from dir-merge is ignored and the file gets deleted. But I'm not quite sure if this behavor is a bug or feature. Test: $ mkdir src $ touch src/object $ echo

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2395 Summary: problems copying from a dir that includes a symlink in the path Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2395 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -------

Hi, i use rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 on Mac OS X 10.6.3 and expierienced the following problem. When using --link-dest=DIR with DIR on the startup volume everything works fine. If DIR is a volume on an external drive many files are copied instead of creating hard links. hardlinks are create e.g. fom .jpg files and from .rtf files but not from .doc files and many other files. The

Hi NG, I want to do incremental backups to a remote server running rsyncd (because daemonless transfer via ssh often hangs!). In contrast to transfer via ssh (without remote rsyncd) this doesn't seem possible, or do I miss something? Imagine I want to incrementally backup `mydir' to the backup space `backup' on e remote server `alpha' running an rsync daemon. rsyncd on

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4961 Summary: rsync ignores --compare-dest flag? Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: jae@platinumpsi.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5647 Summary: A way to make earlier --compare-dest dirs hide later ones Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org