similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7667] New: "devices" regression test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10

HI Team, I am currently working on problem and stumped on "for" loop. Data: structure(list(Coutry = structure(c(3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L), .Label = c("J", "M", "U"), class = "factor"), State = structure(c(1L, 1L, 4L, 2L, 5L, 5L, 3L, 6L), .Label = c("A", "C", "K", "O", "S",

Dear All, I'm not sure of the interpretation of interactions with contrasts. Can anyone help? I do an ANCOVA, dryweight is covariate, block and treatment are factors, c4 the response variable. model<-aov(log(c4+1)~dryweight+treatment+block+treatment:block) summary(model); Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) dryweight 1 3.947 3.947 6.6268 0.01076 *

Hello! I need some help with the linear discriminant analysis in R. I have some plant samples (divided into several groups) on which I measured a few quantitative characteristics. Now, I need to infer some classification rules usable for identifying new samples. I have used the function lda from the MASS library in a usual fashion: lda.1 <- lda(groups~char1+char2+char3, data=xxx) I'd

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

I would appreciate it if someone could explain the results of the example from the aov() help file. The output given below is different from book Venables and Ripley - MASS The results In R1.5.1 (Under windows) is as follows: > N <- c(0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0) > P <- c(1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0) > K <-

Dear Madame, Dear Sir, I am able to obtain the coefficients from a 'summary' of 'lm', but NOT from a 'summary' of 'aov'. The following example shows my steps. ## Initialize rm(list = ls()) # remove (almost) everything in the working environment utils::data(npk, package="MASS") # get data model <- yield ~ block + N*P*K ## Using lm npk.lm <-

Running CentOS Linux 5 with sendmail-procmail putting email in /var/spool/mail. I'm running pop3 only with the servers configured to authenticate with ldap (which is configured and running OK). I do have this same configuration on an older FC6 box and it works fine. I'm thinking I just need to upgrade dovecot given all the nss_ldap problems it has had, but I hate not using RPM

Running CentOS Linux 5 with sendmail-procmail putting email in /var/spool/mail. I'm running pop3 only with the servers configured to authenticate with ldap (which is configured and running OK). I do have this same configuration on an older FC6 box and it works fine. I'm thinking I just need to upgrade dovecot given all the nss_ldap problems it has had, but I hate not using RPM

Dear all, I want to compute the average of the three blocks for each x-variable which is equal slide in the code below. How can I do that ? block x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 1 23 22 23 24 23 1 21 25 26 21 39 1 23 24 22 23 23 2 20 21 23 24 28 2 32 23 34 24 26 2 19

I'm following along with John T's examples book and I'm still befuddled on getting Samba working. The server is Fedora Core 5, Samba 3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 PDC is W2K SP4 with AD I basically copied/pasted the example smb.conf and nsswitch.conf to get a basic working config. The lines "template primary group" gave problems so I removed that one line. I run testparm -s and get:

In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the patches directory. I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ? Thanks by advance. Following the message (a bit long): ----- itemize log follows Testing for symlinks using 'test -h' +

Hi, I've build rsync-3.0.6 on a number of legacy unix systems, and on a few systems the regression tests showed up with some errors: HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23 (ia64): FAIL chown FAIL dir-sgid FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize IRIX 6.5.13m: FAIL chown FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize MacOS-X 10.4: FAIL chgrp the errors on "fuzzy" and "itemize" are

There is a small configure glitch for rsync-2.5.5rc1 on Apple Darwin (== MacOS X) [ uname -a Darwin darwin.math.utah.edu 5.2 Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001; root:xnu/xnu-201.14.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc ] the config.h file gets the line #define INET6 1 The link then fails with /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _freehostent _getipnodebyaddr

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5440 Summary: 'relative' test fails on SunOs 5.8 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: brianegge@yahoo.com

Hi, I tried to build rsync-3.0.0pre4 on a list of different plattforms and got some problems with build or test suite. first, the good news: the build and tests worked fine on these plattforms Solaris 5.5.1, 5.6 and 5.8 (sparc) and 5.10 (x86 and sparc) SUSE Linux 9.0 (amd64), 10.1 (amd6) SLES10 (32 and 64 bit) RedHat 7.1 and 9.0 (32 bit) RedHat EL3 (ia64) problems

Since snapshot rsync-HEAD-20090220-0710GMT.tar.gz make check is successful but sudo make check fails ------------------------------------------------------------ ----- overall results: 29 passed 3 failed 6 skipped ------------------------------------------------------------ failed FAIL batch-mode FAIL chmod-option FAIL daemon-gzip-upload

Hello, here is a preliminary patch allowing rsync 2.5.6 to compile in BeOS (using the new BONE networking stack). Some explanations: - BeOS doesn't have chroot(), - the BONE networking stack export legacy network function for old apps in libnet.so (linked to by default), so it's necessary to force linking to the new libraries for things to work. I've yet to get inet_ntop() to be

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 Summary: merge test fails Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us QAContact:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Recent versions of rsync have a "regression test" called "chmod-option" that when run fails, this should be causing rsync to be rejected as broken by all distros and sysadmins. A bit of research show that no one has mentioned this test since it was last worked on in late September, nor does it show up as a current bug

I'm running 'make check' to run the testsuite, and I did it this way so the ssh-basic test would run: # export rsync_enable_ssh_tests=yes # make check I did set up ssh so this would run, and here's what I get for output: POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 TOOLDIR=`pwd` rsync_bin=`pwd`/rsync srcdir="." ./runtests.sh ============================================================