similar to: ...failed: too many links (31)

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:59:25 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > btrfs has support for this: you make a backup, then create a btrfs > snapshot of the filesystem (or directory), then the next time you make a > new backup with rsync, use --inplace so that just changed parts of the > file are written to the same blocks and btrfs will take care of the > copy-on-write part. That's

Greetings, This, I hope, is a simply answered question. Based on Agile Web Development with Rails (depot application), I''m developing a single table application for contact info. There is only an admin side to this, so there''s always authentication. Part of the info record (member) is changed_by and changed_at which I automatically want updated. Changed_at looks after

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:19:23 +0000, Andrew Gideon wrote: > Look at tools like inotifywait, auditd, or kfsmd to see what's easily > available to you and what best fits your needs. > > [Though I'd also be surprised if nobody has fed audit information into > rsync before; your need doesn't seem all that unusual given ever-growing > disk storage.] I wanted to take this

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:40:51 +0100, Simon Hobson wrote: > The think here is that you are into "backup" tools rather than the > general purpose tool that rsync is intended to be. Yes, that is true. Rsync serves so well as a core component to backup, I can be blind about "something other than rsync". I'll look at the tools you suggest. However, you've made be

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 Summary: rsync --hard-links fails where ditto succeeds Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Dave at Yost.com

I'm trying to understand the point of the --checksum-seed option. As I understand it from a little reading, checksums are not cached over executions of rsync. So...what is the point of fixing the seed? Is this in support of patches which *do* support caching of checksums? I've read about caching these in files and in xaddr. Is there a "best solution" for caching

Hi, we use attachment dedup with lots of emails (still migrating to it from maildir). We use netapp storage with wafl filesystem over nfs. Problem is that netapp has hard limit of 100k hardlinks to one file. And we encountered it. Problem is that dovecot start do segfault (lmtp,dsync,pop3 etc) when it happend when tried to deliver new emails with that attachment. Here is strace of dsync: 6740

I currently do incremental backups using --link-dest. Unchanged files are hard links to the previous snapshot; changed files are new copies. Where this "fails" is for large files that have received small changes. The directory containing my main IMAP account, for example, typically generates between 1 and 2 G of daily backup data as I file messages in my inbox. Yesterday, though,

Hey While trying to get some svg files of the CentOS logo I found that [1] can't load the images. The urls are : http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-new-2.png http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-logo-3.png http://files.squirtgun.ca//CentOS/images/logos/centosLogoRound_v001.jpg Maybe someone can fix this. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Logo Cheers Didi ---- My www page:

I am looking for a manual(s) or any kind of documentation, at the introductory level, regarding matrix algebra (specifically, matrix population models). Any help will be highly appreciated Gideon Gideon Wasserberg (Ph.D.) Wildlife research unit, Department of wildlife ecology, University of Wisconsin 218 Russell labs, 1630 Linden dr., Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. Tel.:608 265 2130, Fax: 608

Andrew Gideon <c182driver1 at gideon.org> wrote: > These both bring me to the idea of using some file system auditing > mechanism to drive - perhaps with an --include-from or --files-from - > what rsync moves. > > Where I get stuck is that I cannot envision how I can provide rsync with > a limited list of files to move that doesn't deny the benefit of --link- >

I've found an error: ACLs are not properly preserved when a file is moved from Solaris to a 2.6 Linux (I'm testing using CentOS 4 update 3 plus updates). This is using 2.6.8 built with the acl patch on both platforms. The file on the source Solaris machine: [truffle:/opt]# getfacl /xxx/x # file: /xxx/x # owner: root # group: other user::rw- user:httpd:r-x #effective:r--

Hello, I have been working on porting ASan to AArch64. I am building compiler-rt in "standalone mode" targeting aarch64. My build is successful, but I get the following runtime error when I run an ASan enabled executable through qemu-aarch64: ==29184==Parsed ASAN_OPTIONS: verbosity=1 ==29184==AddressSanitizer: failed to intercept '__isoc99_printf' ==29184==AddressSanitizer:

Hey A wise man said to me that Hashing filters was my solution to rock the world, and making my life alot easier. When applying 4000 rules, the system had to check them all for match. But with hassing it would only require 1-2 checks. Even though when i had read the lartc on the subject i was no less that a question mark. If anyone have played with it, and have a working, logic configuration

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 Summary: rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links" Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

I've been using a 2.6.2 that I modified myself to get ACLs as I like. I'm trying now to get back into the public version of rsync, but am finding difficulties. This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After the operation, f1 and f2 should have identical ACLs. They don't. [root@house0

samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 > > --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- > Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due > to too many hard links. ---------- What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test setup that

Hi I don't know if you can help. I am a 2nd year Bsc Cosmetic Science student and in R I need some help in drawing stars. The problem that I have is I want to recreate a radar diagram similar to the one in excel. I have put in these commands in a script window: stars(shampoo1[, 1:6], locations = c(0,0), radius = TRUE, key.loc=c(0,0), main = "Ranked Results for the Sensory

This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc on my cluster. I truly wish they would not do that :). I guess I shall have to not allow automatic yum updates from

Hi all, I've a problem during a big migration to dovecot. I'm not sure that is a really a dovecot bug ... but maybe somebody here know one solution ... I have more than 150000 imap account to migrate from an obscure mail system based on a database to an imap/dovecot system. During the migration (simple but very long process) I get a "Too many links" error from dovecot.