similar to: Backup to NTFS USB drive --compare-dest not working

Hi, Linux-Ubuntu here. English is not my first language. The man rsync is difficult to understand. I want to backup some folders recursively and some files, see [1] in my /home dir to an external USB HD (Ext4). I want to use a text file for the purpose. [1] /home/user/Documents /home/user/Software /home/user/.evolution/addressbook/local/system/addressbook.db

Hello, We currently have a scenario where a large percentage of inbound calls on a telco PRI are intended for professors who aren't currently in their offices/at their desks. My question is, is anyone actively using the Asterisk "RLT" (Release Link Trunking) feature to bounce these sorts of calls back to the telco? The idea being to forward the call to their mobile phone without

The rsync tutorial is for new rsync users. Three small backup examples thoroughly explain rsync --link-dest, --recursive, and --exlcude-from options.? http://sites.google.com/site/rsync2u/home/rsync-tutorial rsync2u is a job-driven script that uses rsync to backup files to a local USB device or harddrive.? http://sites.google.com/site/rsync2u/home Someone please post the above lines on the rsync

Hi, sorry if this has been asked before, but I just can't find anywhere on the net that tells me how to do this. I've been trying for ages to get this right, using various forms of --include-from, --exclude, --filter, etc. I want to copy only specific directories that contain specific filetypes, from sourcedir to destdir. For example, I want to copy all .mp3 and all .ogg files found in

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13582 Bug ID: 13582 Summary: rsync filters containing multiple adjacent slashes aren't reduced to just one slash before matching Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

''cause it doesn''t... This is an issue for nested custom matchers, ie: module CRFT class RFT def initialize(args) blah end def matches?(target) "Yeah, baby!" end end def r_f_t(args) RFT.new(args) end end module CRLT class RLT include CRFT def initialize(args) blag end def matches?(target)

Hello, I wanted to say:: this file is a directory and must be created , this directory and it''s content should be owned by root:www-data with 640 mode for file and 750 for dirs: file { "base_admin": path => "/my/dir" owner => ''root'', group

Hi, I?m trying to rsync from an IBM SONAS, that has no POSIX ACLs. I thought that without the ?p flag, this should still work, and the destination will just inherit permissions, however, it doesn?t. My source directory on the SONAS looks like: ~$ ls -la /net/sonas/directory d--------- 2 user group 36 Oct 9 12:59 ./ d--------- 2 user group 36 Oct 9 12:59 ../ ---------- 2 user group

Hi, I am using rsync 3.0.4 on a WinXP machine (with CygWin) to synchronize my files to a RedHat Linux server. Everything is working perfectly, but there is one thing I do not understand. Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync. When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync process on my WinXP machine, just as expected rsync -rlt -e

I have not been able to get two B-channel transfer to work on DMS100 PRI. I consistently get the following errors: [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: ROSE RETURN ERROR: [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: OPERATION: RLT_OPERATION_IND [Nov 6 11:12:49] ERROR[2774]: chan_zap.c:8178 zt_pri_error: ERROR: RLT Not Allowed I have tried on two

Quite strange at first sight that the failure should depend on the files containing NULs! But I've reproduced it on both Ubuntu and OpenSUSE with d73762e "Preparing for release of 3.1.3". The problem remains even if you drop the --checksum or --delay-updates options from the command line, but goes away if you don't use both "--sparse" and "--preallocate"

Problem was introduced with this commit: commit f3873b3d88b61167b106e7b9227a20147f8f6197 Author: Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> Date: Mon Oct 10 11:49:50 2016 -0700 Support --sparse combined with --preallocate or --inplace. The new code tries to punch holes in the destination file using newer Linux fallocate features. It also supports a --whole-file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13320 Bug ID: 13320 Summary: file contents cause rsync to fail (with certains args and dir structure) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

script to reproduce: #!/bin/bash #tested to fail as below: ArchLinux's rsync-3.1.3-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz #tested to fail as below: ArchLinux's rsync-3.1.3pre1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz #tested to work ok : ArchLinux's rsync-3.1.2-8-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz if test "$1" == "clean"; then rm -vrf destdir sourcedir sourcedir2 sourcedir3 exit 0 fi echo '!! test 1:'

Hi, I just migrated from dovecot 1.0.rc29 to 1.1.7, from Sparc platform to Intel, it went very well. In the process I merged folders and excluded folders from being copied. User rights on folders were kept/set. I thought I'd share my migration script with you folks. If there's an interest to put it on the wiki I can do that, but I'm not sure in what page. Use it as a starter if you

I am using deltacopy (uses rsync) to backup up a drive in windows vista to a freenas server. Before moving to vista, had the system working fine (on a windows xp machine). The command used for the backup is: rsync.exe -v -rlt -z --delete "/cygdrive/F/TXT/" "nas::160d/_Acer_F/TXT/" As a result of this command, rsync should create a dir (not on nas) and then copy some files

V4 of the patch, incorporating Bastian's suggestions. Jon --- xen/debian/patches/series | 1 + xen/debian/patches/tools-ocaml-fix-build.diff | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ xen/debian/rules | 5 ++ xen/debian/rules.real | 39 ++++++++++++ xen/debian/templates/control.main.in | 16 +++++

Hi, I was trying to make a mirror backup of a folder in my machine with the following command: rsync -avh --delete /source/ /destination But the extra files that where on "destination" didn't got deleted. Where as doing: rsync -avh --delete /source/ /destination/ worked as expected. I wonder if this is correct, or it shouldn't be like that. -------------- next part

I've looked around for a bug report on this problem and haven't seen one, so I apologize if this has already been discussed. I have a homegrown script which uses rsync to maintain daily backups of roughly twenty Redhat Linux systems running RH 7.2, 7.3, AS 3, and AS 4. As there are files with multiple links on the source systems, it is necessary to call rsync using the -H (--hard-links)

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> wrote: > OK, first pass on TODO complete. .... This hardlink bug report is nearly 21 months old... So I took a look at it using 2.5.7. See below. > BUGS --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fix hardlink reporting 2002/03/25 > (was: There seems