similar to: Simple whole volume copy

Dear all is it possible to rsync in a master-slave scenario saving to slave gzip content? i'm not talking about compression during transfer, i'm talking about -saving- the destination in a compressed format. Example: FROM: -folder_A --file_A --file_B TO: -folder_A --file_A.gz --file_B.gz I know that this won't be a "real" rsync between two folder, but it will be an

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20091030/c43a29f5/attachment.html>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2554 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-03-29 11:50 ------- (In reply to comment #0) >> If a file will be deleted the line starts with "Delete", but when a > file will be copied or overwritten, nothing is displayed. I assume you mean, "no prefix is displayed" since there is something that is

Hello All - I'm looking for a switch(es) to ensure rsync indexes the pull of files from remotedir, LIFO (last in first out) and then by .ext type where file basenames are similar. example) file_a.xml ctime of 09:01:07 file_a.jar ctime of 09:01:02 get transfered before file_b.xml ctime of 09:01:45 file_b.jar ctime of 09:01:45 and the .xml of basename $file would always be transferred

As Ben mentioned, ZFS snapshots is one possible approach. Another approach is to have a faster storage system. I have seen considerable speed improvements with rsync on similar data sets by say upgrading the storage sub system. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This email is protected by LBackup, an open source backup solution http://www.lbackup.org

I am a developer on the LBackup project. An LBackup user recently posted a question to the mailing list asking about the following error. > "rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0)" Link to thread : <http://www.mail-archive.com/lbackup-discussion at lists.connect.homeunix.com/msg00040.html> My understanding of this error is that when copying files via

rsync folks, Henri Shustak <henri.shustak at gmail.com> wrote: > LBackup always starts a new backup snapshot with an empty directory. I > have been looking at extending --link-dest options to scan beyond just > the previous successful backup to (failed backups / older backups). > However, there are all kinds of edge cases which are worth considering > with such a changes. At

Hi All, I am writing a backup program for my computer. brief outline is as follows. Running ubuntu 10.04 2 main partitions, / and /home, both ext3. 1 external usb hdd, ext3, mounted to /backups/main. once every couple of days, rsync backs up, using following command, everything worth backing up in / and /home partitions to a folder /backups/main/Full. command: "rsync -vrhRupElog

I'm using rsync 3.0.7 on Mac OS X 10.6, compiled according to Mike Bombich's instructions at http://www.bombich.com/rsync.html. Rsync repeatedly exits with a protocol data stream error when trying to copy some com.apple.FinderInfo extended attributes. While testing this issue, I found that rsync is not actually copying all extended attributes even when there is no error message. I'm

I am using llvm for source-to-source inlining. So I did: % llvm-gcc file_a.c file_b.c ... file_n.c -o file % opt -inline -inline-threshold=1000 < file.bc | llc -march=c > outfile.c Can anyone tell me how llvm determines if a function should be inlined, and what roll does "inline-threshold" play ? (Does the example mean that if the function body has fewer than 1000 instructions,

I am involved with the development of lbackup. This message to the rsync mailing list is related to the following thread on the lbackup-disccussion mailing list : http://tinyurl.com/lbackup-discussion-diskfull Essentially, I am curious to if any one using rsync 3.0.7 on Mac OS (10.6) Server has experienced an out of disk space error and not had a message similar to the following reported : >

Is there a way to have rsync not treat files that have gone missing (e.g. Maildir messages that have been removed) as errors while indicating I/O errors and such? Bill -- INTERNET: bill at celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186

Hello, Mac OS X 10.9 has the bad habit of considering a rename on an UDF FS as a file change; that is: > touch -t 201010101010 test > ls -l test -rw-r--r-- 1 gui staff 0 10 oct 2010 test > mv test fail > ls -l fail -rw-r--r-- 1 gui staff 0 29 nov 00:19 fail rsync.c (3.1.2), in archive mode, calls set_file_attrs *before* renaming .file.XXXXXX to file. So, in the

hello, does somebody know how to circumvent that "extra file access restriction feature" introduced in osx some time ago ? i already tried adding rsync binary to programms with "full disk access" privilege ( system-prefs -> security & privacy -> privacy -> full disk access)? , since running as root is not sufficient - but it does not work. i want to make sure

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/14/2015 11:35 PM, Henri Shustak wrote: >> Ill take a look but I imagine I cant backup the 80 Million files >> I need to in under the 5 hours i have for nightly >> maintenance/backups. Currently it's possible by recycling >> directories... I would expect that recycling directories actually makes this worse. With an

Just chiming in slightly off topic. As a first step if you are going to be backing up files to some media with a computer it would be a really good idea to ensure, that the hardware being used is not faulty. I am not saying that your hardware is faulty. However, it would be worth checking this somehow. Check the drive media for bad blocks, check that all the cables are working well. Ensure the

I am involved with the development of LBackup <http://www.lbackup.org> Recently there was a post to the lbackup-dicussion mailing list. <http://tinyurl.com/lbackup-discussion-device-not> Within the post they reported the following error: > rsync: read > "/Volumes/Drobo_HD/lbackups/theserver.Homes/Section.0/Faculty/andrewmac/.DS_Store": > Device not configured

Feature request: allow --link-dest dir to be linked to even if file exists in target. This statement from the man page is adhered to too strongly IMHO: "This option works best when copying into an empty destination hierarchy, as rsync treats existing files as definitive (so it never looks in the link-dest dirs when a destination file already exists)". I was suprised by this behaviour

Hi, I have a small server at home. I like to put it 'online' and secure it as good as possible. The counterside of putting your personal backups on a server is that it might get hacked... and you don't want have to have your personal docs online... Do you think encryption is needed? How to use encryption with rsync? Thanks in advance, ~D

How do you handle snapshotting? or do you leave that to the block/fs virtualization layer? /kc On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:35:27PM +1200, Henri Shustak said: >> Our backup procudures have provision for looking back at previous directories, but there is not much to be gained with recycled directories. Without recycling, and after a failure, the latest available backup may not have much