similar to: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)"

2010 Feb 17
1
Problems transferring from older version of rsync to new
I have a system running rsync in daemon mode, the version information: > rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 On another system I have: > authoritative# rsync --version rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 I have the following problem when trying to fetch files from the system running the old daemon: # /usr/local/bin/rsync --protocol=29 -vvvvvvvv
2013 Dec 05
0
error "rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)"
G'day Sambaites, I'm trying to use rsync to backup from one machine to another. I'm getting an error "rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)" and I don't know where to go from here. I'm running the rsync daemon on machine starker. I'm trying to backup from another machine to it. For testing, I'm just trying to backup one file. The
2007 Dec 02
3
rsync hangs when accessing through SSH (Leopard OS X)
To preface, I'm running Leopard OSX and am using rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29. Whenever I attempt to sync (using rsync obviously) a folder on my local drive to my web server (netfirms.com is my web host) using SSH, the process hangs. I have to force kill it in order to continue using Terminal. I can connect to my server space using SSH just fine by itself, and I ran
2006 Mar 30
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3646] New: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (3207118 bytes received so far) [generator]
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3646 Summary: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (3207118 bytes received so far) [generator] Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2008 Feb 16
3
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver]
Hi all: I am trying to transfer a file from a machine A to a machine B. I ran a rsync deamon on machine B at a given port. Because there is a firewall between these two machines, I opened the port on the firewall. Is this enough to get rsync work through firewall? When I tried the transfer, I got the following error messages. my command: rsync -a --copy-links localfile rsync:://me@<my
2018 Dec 30
2
--partial does not "unhide" the files
Hi, I used --partial to transfer files from my local computer (rsync 3.1.2, Debian) to a remote computer (rsync 3.1.1 WD MyPassport Storage device) The files get transferred, but after successful transfer, the files are not renamed from .<tmpfile> to <file>. Where to go next? Here is the verbose output after transferring an empty file heiko at blade:~/Pictures$ rsync
2009 Aug 17
1
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed
I'm using Rsync 3.1.0 and VanDyke VShell for SSH. Both services have started up in the remote server under the local account nasadmin. I know port 22 is open on the firewall because i was able to see the root directory being created after an rsync command from the server, but no files were synchronized over. Later, i started receiving this error and can only guess there is something wrong
2019 Nov 05
1
Segmentation fault using rsync client on Android device
I've compiled rsync for my rooted Android (armeabi-v7a, 32-bit) device using these instructions: ``` clone_or_update rsync master git://git.samba.org/rsync.git cd rsync ./prepare-source ./configure \ --prefix=$INSTALL_ROOT/rsync \ --host=$AUTOCONF_PLATFORM \ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -static" make -j8 && make install cd - ``` Best place for instructions to build I could find
2011 Sep 13
1
protect rule prevents file sending when in merge filter file?
Hi, We upgraded from rsync 2.6.8 to 3.0.6, and ran into a problem with P (protect) rules coming in from filter files. The rule works if given on command line, but if given via . (merge), it no longer works. The effect is that files are not sent to the destination any more. I verified the problem still exists in 3.0.9pre2. I don't think this is bug 8309
2008 Oct 09
2
Possible 3.0.4 bug with -s (--protect-args) - protocol error
Hi. Two different hosts with 3.0.4 compiled from source, no patches. It seems fine except that -s causes protocol failures. See below. Local host is Sparc (Solaris 5.8), remote is Sparc (Solaris 5.10) or i686 Linux. Regards, Giuliano. userX@hostA$ /home/userX/tools/bin/rsync -v -v -v -v -v -n --rsync-path /home/userX/tools/bin/rsync -s . hostB: FILE_STRUCT_LEN=16, EXTRA_LEN=4 cmd=<NULL>
2017 Nov 18
2
family
Hi all, I am reading a huge data set(12M rows) that contains family information, Offspring, Parent1 and Parent2 Parent1 and parent2 should be in the first column as an offspring before their offspring information. Their parent information (parent1 and parent2) should be set to zero, if unknown. Also the first column should be unique. Here is my sample data set and desired output. fam
2005 Jul 14
1
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
Hi all, in my log file (/var/log/messages) I see two error lines. I don't know their explained: Jul 14 09:12:51 vna009 rsyncd[21139]: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) Jul 14 09:12:51 vna009 rsyncd[21139]: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150) My configuration file is this (/etc/rsyncd.conf): [web] path =
2006 Feb 09
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3492] New: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 Summary: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (24 bytes read so far) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2003 Dec 31
2
Valid Users in Samba 3
All - I'm having a problem with the "valid users" directive working. I have an Accounting share that only the Accounting department should have access to. However, I am unable to lock the directory down so only they can access it. I am running samba-3.0.0-2 from an RPM on RedHat 9.0. Below are details of my trials. This is a pretty urgent need, please. Thank you! smb.conf
2001 Dec 17
1
disabling sftp authentication using openssh 2.9.9p2...
I'm trying to use sftp from a 2.9.9p2 client, connecting to a F-Secure 2.4.0 server, but consistently get the following. debug1: authentications that can continue: hostbased,publickey,password debug1: next auth method to try is publickey debug1: try privkey: /path/acct/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: try pubkey: /path/acct/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: authentications that can continue:
1998 Dec 18
2
Samba Guest Account
Wow I'm sending my second cry for help before the first even gets a reply, I'm starting to feel like a moron because I have no idea how I caused this current hitch. Here's the story: I was trying to add an acct called "administrator" to samba which has an enabled,good linux acct. I never did get that acct working for some unknown reason, but what happened as a result of my
2009 Feb 01
1
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 109
Sorry, but why u r using the Radius with the CDR? Not enough to access the CDR in the /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv? Also, what kind of Radius u r using? Any suggested link? Regards Bilal > > Hello list. > > I'm having some problems with the CDR Radius in my > Asterisk 1.4. I'm > using two TC400B cards for transcoding. When I reach > nearly 100 >
2004 Nov 29
2
Permissions Problem
Hi all, I've got a share called [ACCOUNTING] with the following share definition: [ACCOUNTING] path = /data/samba/shares/Accounting valid users = @acct @"Domain Admins" browseable = yes public = no read only = no force group = acct Here is the permissions on the directory: oink:/data/samba/shares # ls -ld /data/samba/shares/Accounting drwxrwxr-x 9 root acct 4096 Nov 29 09:30
2016 Oct 26
4
Anyone know anything about slurm on CentOS 7?
The recently-left programmer did *something*, and he didn't know what, and the guy who picked it up is working with me to find out why /var/log/messages is getting flooded with Oct 26 11:01:06 <servername> kernel: type=1105 audit(1477494066.569:642430): pid=108551 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:session_open
2002 Oct 09
1
ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
has anyone seen this error: ns1: /acct/peter> rsync ns1.pad.com::acct overflow: flags=0xe8 l1=3 l2=20709376 lastname=. ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(238) ns1: /acct/peter> -- Peter Dominguez 72 Belvedere Dr Yonkers, NY 10705-2814 USA Tel: 914-423-4000 Fax: 914-423-8640 Email: peter@pad.com