similar to: Odd failure ...

Hi folks, We have an old internal server running samba version 3.2.15 which can't be upgraded for different reasons. It's been running several passwordless shares with no problem. Now I'm trying to configure passworded user shares and not having much luck. I'm wondering if someone can help me diagnose this: In smb.conf I have security = user map to guest = Bad user ... username

Hi ! I am trying to use rsync to copy ACL between two Windows hosts. First, I try locally on a Windows hosting an AD. If I use rsync 3, I get this (I get the same thing with latest snapshot): -bash-3.2$ ./rsync-HEAD-20070703-1547GMT/rsync.exe -aAv copieA/ copieB sending incremental file list recv_acl_access: value out of range: ff rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It's my understanding that as of 3.0 rsync supports OS X ACLs and extended attributes, and that it should be possible to backup a tree from an OS X system that contains files and folders with ACLs and extended attributes to a Linux host filesystem that has both "user_xattrs" and "acl" enabled on the destination file system.

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

Has rsync integrated windows acls into it yet? I keep getting error after the first sync: receiving incremental file list recv_acl_access: value out of range: ff rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at acls.c(670) [receiver=3.0.5] thanks.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267 Bug ID: 14267 Summary: rsync produces unhelpful errors on remote copy to OS with different ACL format Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core

Under cygwin 1.5.25 we get the following compile warnings flist.c: In function `output_flist': flist.c:2648: warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg (arg 4) flist.c:2648: warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg (arg 4) flist.c:2655: warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg (arg 5) flist.c:2655: warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg (arg 5) flist.c:2659: warning: int format,

I've been trying to set up an OpenSolaris-based ZFS NAS server, with one of its functions being a backup server for my Mac-based network. I'm using rsync 3.0.3 pre2 on my Macs with some extended attribute patches, but have been running into some compatibility problems when rsyncing via SSH from a Mac to the Solaris server (I'm not running daemon mode on the server, but rsync 3.0.3 pre2

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Dan Kaminsky wrote: >> >> > Hmm. Feels a little aggressive for ssh client. Support heartily for >> sshd. >> >> People who need it can build their own, or OS vendors

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Summary: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Alright, so I pulled the data from scans.io, There's actually 82,650 devices on the open Internet claiming support for <=SSH-1.5, generally routers. Top 20 on that is: $ head -n 20 ssh1_versions.txt 39148 SSH-1.5-Cisco-1.25 14477 SSH-1.5-HUAWEI-VRP3.1 10571 SSH-1.5-1.0.0 4634 SSH-1.5-HUAWEI-VRP-3.10 3284 SSH-1.5-1.2.33 2965 SSH-1.5-VRP-3.3 1836 SSH-1.5-VRP-3.4 1125

Hi folks, It may be a very basic question for many people here but I have been struggling with Windows commandline. My CentOS machines are running perfectly fine. Question: I have installed cwRsync server on one of Windows 2003 and cwRsync client on the other Windows 2003. What command should I run to connect to the cwRsync server from the client? and how can I make sure that cwRsync is even

Hello, I'm desperately trying to have a RSync server work on a Windows 2003 Standard Server. All the documentation available I have found applies to Windows NT/2000/XP I don't know whether 2003 works differently from the previous Windows. I have installed the cwrsync package. The RSyncServer Service is running fine under a user account named cwrsync. A successful Telnet on the port 873

Hi all, we are just beginning to dive into rsync. I have limited experience with just playing around with the examples and reading all the docs that I can. I just read an interesting post from a developer that mentions cwrsync is a minimalistic rsync and thus things like permissions are not transfered, the post was from 2004. Here are my questions Windows (cw)Rsync Client --> Linux Rsync

Hi all! We're using cwrsync server 2.0.4 on winxp to keep files up to date between some operator machines. Whenever I run rsync to send files to another machine, the read-only flag gets set. The cwrsync user was created (the install is completely standard)... so I'm thinking it might have something to do with that. Here's my rsyncd.conf: use chroot = false strict modes = false

Yes I?m using cwrync 1.2.4 that it contains the 2.6.2 rsync version command. A problem I have to use cygwin is that I have implemented the cwrsync command in a script .js (jscript) then... Should I make a new script bash file for linux? or is it possible call cygwin?s rsync from a DOS shell line command? Thank you very much :) Jos? Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: Craig Barratt

Using cwRsync on Windows, is there any way to get the standard rsync stats at the end? It does not look like '--stats' is an option for cwRsync and verbose does not provide the stats. -- Robert

If this isn't the correct list for cwRsync issues, I apologize and hope someone can point me in the right direction. Otherwise, keep reading . I noticed something odd today with one of our backups. I have an NT 2000 machine that pushes files to a 2003 Server machine and today someone brought to my attention that the backup seems to have well over 100GiB more than

I'm having prolems with cwRsync on server 2003. I'm getting pretty much identical results to this from the archive: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-April/009187.html, and as far as I can see the only suggestion there was to check permissions. I have one further complication too- I'm trying to sync a remote server on to a vmware virtual disk that I've mounted using the

Hi, I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch being included in the main tree... is there a reason it still isn't in there? For anyone who is forced to dealing with backing up windows boxes, this is a big problem, and I can't believe that it isn't affecting a lot of people... Or maybe there is a simple workaround? I'm trying to backup files