similar to: Latency and Rsync Transfers

Hello All, I have been using rsync to backup several filesystems by using Mike Rubel's hard link method (http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/). The problem is, I am backing up a lot of ASCII .log, csv, and .txt files. These files are large and can range anywhere from 1GB to 30GB. I was wondering if on the target side (the backup side), if I can use some sort of compression. I

Hello, We are using asterisk 1.6, sangoma pri card, and Cisco 7960 phones. When we make or receive calls there is a delay before voice is heard. Anyone have any ideas on where to start to debug or has anyone seen this before. We have played with settings on pri, asterisk, and phones with no change. Thanks for your help and ideas in advance. Neal -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi All, Does anyone have any experience getting a 7936 to work with Asterisk? Do you need to use SCCP or is there a SIP image for the phone? I have a few 7960G's and they are working with SIP, just curious if the config of the conference phone is the same and if anybody has any good setup links. Thanks! NB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear rsync folks, I'd like to request/suggest that cli options to set TCP send/receive buffers be added to rsync client-side. Summary: I'm aware that a daemon's config-file can set socket options for the server side (e.g. SO_SNDBUF, SO_RCVBUF). That is useful. But when trying to get high-throughput rsync over long paths (i.e. large bandwidth*delay product), since

Hi All, I am trying to configure asterisk to receive an inbound SIP connection and send it to a specified context. Instead of sending the call the specified context, asterisk is using the context default from [general]? Any thoughts? I am sure that it is something simple I am missing. To recap, it is sending calls to the context default, not thecontext... [general] context=default

Hi all, I have run into a problem with our samba4 setup. I have successfully joined a Cisco ISE v1.1.4 (Identity Service Engine) test machine to the samba4 AD. User authentication does work but unfortunately the ISE is unable to fetch the AD groups from the domain controller. In the samba logs I get the following error message when initiating the group fetch: [2013/10/02 10:21:37.605554, 0]

On 20.03.22 16:02, Roger Price wrote: >I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE): > > The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of > implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a > protocol.? The best example of such a failure is the browser version > field in HTTP.? A complete disaster.? You should warn

h?, I am preparing undergraduate thesis If you help me this would make me feel good. First I need to analyze effect of Dow Jones Industrial average(DJIA)'s return on Istanbul Stock Exchange(ISE). I want to use Markov-Switching Bayesian Vector Autoregression Models (MSBVAR) that is used to examine the effect of a large economy?s stock exchange movement on a small economy?s stock exchange

Hi, We are planning to integrate CISCO-ISE with Samba-AD (Version 4.6.5). Websense gateway / proxy are all properly integrated and even single sign-on is properly functioning. However, before attempting integration of Cisco ISE with Samba-AD, through I should clarify on the following. Hence writing this mail. Cisco ISE supports LDAPs with Following authentication methods: * Extensible

I received the following comment from the Independent Submissions Editor (ISE): The command VER is hazardous because it encourages exploiting of implementation peculiarities that are not well documented in a protocol.? The best example of such a failure is the browser version field in HTTP.? A complete disaster.? You should warn against use of this command, or even better, deprecate it.

Hi, Some time back I had written to the list about integrating Cisco ISE and facing errors with RPC login. When we actually integrated using ISE 2.4.0357 we noticed that Kerberos authentication is working like a charm. But MS-RPC authentication throws error. From the samba logs, we noticed that ISE workstation is able to negotiate the RPC ports switch to higher Dynamic RPC ports,

Hello, I would like to contribute to the Wiki. A few things right off - I'd like to add to the "Yum and RPM Tricks" section and would also like to add information and tips on setting up CentOS machines for FPGA (Quartus/ISE/Modelsim) development. Also, I use CentOS on a day to day basis for development, and would be happy to document any useful tips I come across in the future.

Hi, We have integrated CISCO ISE with Samba-AD. However we are receiving the below error. “Authentication encountered an error due to the network, AD DNS misconfiguration. This may be a temporary error” However the AD Log reports the authentication is successful. I saw a bug reported at*/https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11892.

Hy , my english is bad,bad sorry I need change a server pdc samba , and change too the domain name, so i can't export users and sid . Exist some tool to export and covert the old porfile to the new domain? thanks Maximo Monsalvo

Hi all of you. I am trying to configure voice mail in asterisk and i am facing problems. I have found following warning message in /var/log/asterisk/messages -------------- No application 'Voicemail' for extension (macro-mainmenu, s, 5) I have configured voice mail accordingly in extention.conf [headoffice] -- ------------ ------------- exten => _63,1,Macro(mainmenu)

folks hi, something i just wanted to double-check. is it possible to use, with LLVM, entirely free software tools to build and upload to a xilinx microblaze FPGA target? i take some c code, put it through llvm-fpga, aaand... then what? is there any documentation about this stuff, anywhere? tia, l.

Ok, and then? in file smb.conf.192.168.0.1 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth0 ... [FOR_ALL] ... in file smb.conf.192.168.0.2 [global] ... bind interfase only = yes interfaces = eth1 ... [ADMINS] ... Does this configuration works? Is this a good solution? i really don't know, so what's the global thinking about this. -- Information Systems

Hello, I have a question concerning the performance of rsync beteen two sites, one in India one in Germany. File exchange between 2 Linux-machines is done using rsync-3.0.5 (typical file size 1.5 GB). Destination machine is: Linux machine1 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:16:15 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Source machine is: Linux machine2 2.6.18-53.el5 #1 SMP Wed Oct 10

Re-poked. - Daniel On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 03/11/2014 12:41 PM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >> Hi Chris, hi Daniel, >> >> I see again internal server errors when visiting llvm.org/perf. I >> remember you have been restarting the service several times, but it >> seems it is happening again. Did

We get the warning above whenever we use a ProxyCommand. We _know_ it's a pipe, so we can't use sockopts on it. So we shouldn't bitch about it. This breaks all kinds of things which use SSH transparently; including pine, which really wants the first thing it receives from an IMAP server to be a valid imap greeting... which $subject is not. $ ssh -o "proxycommand sh -c '(