similar to: Include and Exclude

I hate to say anything remotely negative to Wayne but... That wording from the man page makes almost no sense without the examples directly after it (and I have read it many times and know what it is saying). When I go all RTFM on this topic I usually tell them to 'man rsync', search for file-will-not-be-found and start reading from that line. Once you understand the broken and correct

On Wed, 4 May 2016 21:09:44 -0400 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > That wording from the man page makes almost no sense without the > examples directly after it (and I have read it many times and know > what it is saying). Makes sense to me. The only thing I'd change is to use "in a depth first fasion" instead of "from the top down", "depth

I was under the impression that --include and --exclude worked by matching patterns in the order given, and whichever matched first, whether that was an include or exclude determined the action for that file. I have a big directory from which I am attempting to transfer selected files. I want all files where the first level directory is anything, the second level directory is "2005"

Hello, Since the very first day I've been using rsync - some 15 years ago - the filtering rules caused great grieve. Their behaviour is just not the way I'd expect it be be and as I read the manpage. Usually I end up with some hand-written recipes, carefully documented,y including all the gotchas. This time however I failed and I see no other way than to ask for advice. Given the

On 11/06/2014 13:59, Roy Spliet wrote: > Dear Mr. Dew, > > I hereby wish to propose the X.org EVoC project "REclock - > Reverse-engineer and implement NVA3/5/8 Voltage- and Frequency Scaling > in Nouveau" for which I am willing to participate, and apply for the > associated funding. Full details below or on > http://nouveau.spliet.org/evoc.html . For any further

Hi All, I wanted to send a follow-up mail to the C API discussion/BoF that we had at the latest developer meeting and nicely hosted by Justin and Juergen. We were able to reach consensus on a number of questions/concerns about the C API so I’m going to go ahead and list them for posterity and for any further discussion here: Stability Guarantees: The C API is, in general, a “best effort” for

"Documentation: We’re going to document this policy in the developer documentation. In addition, any changes to the C API will require documentation in the release notes so that it’s clear to external users who do not follow the project how the C API is changing and evolving." So, yes? -eric On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:55 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Are

Helle everyone, Let's say we have 3 servers, 2 of them have the latest (stable) version of rsyncd running (2.6.9) <Server1> ==> I N T E R N E T ==> <Server2 (rsyncd running)> ==> LAN ==> <Server3 (rsyncd running)> Suppose I want to send a big file (bigfile.big) from Server1 to both Server2 and Server3. It would be a good idea to send first from Server1

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4764 Summary: Wrong include/exclude descriptions Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: tps@vr-web.de QAContact:

Hi, I'm faced with the following problem and would appreciate some advice. I could have a data frame x that looks like this: aa bb a 1 "A" b 2 "B" The advantage of this is that I could access all the individual components easily. Also I could access all the rows and columns easily. Alternatively, I could have a list of

Hello On kubevirt project we are using IpV6 Kind cluster, and trying to support migration, but since both of the containers are on the same host we get this error {"component":"virt-launcher","level":"error","msg":"internal error: Attempt to migrate guest to the same host

Hello all! (cc-ing the flac-dev list) I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification. • Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable. • 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.' • Clarifications have been made for binary representation. • Typos and other small changes have been

Michael Johnson - MJ <mj at revmj.com> wrote: > rsync -av /src/ /dst/ && touch /dst/done Aaaaahhhh, knew I'd miss some detail. All the syncs are pushed to the backup server. But that does give me an idea. I guess I could do that on the source, then sync the flag file over. rsync -avH ${other_gubbins} / user at remote.machine:/dest/ && touch /etc/donefile

I am attempting to construct a conditioning plot with a pair of boxplots within each panel. The resulting plot has panels misplaced. One misplaced panel is on top of the subcomponent describing ranges of the conditioning variable. This is what I did: X <- cut(rnorm(200), 2) Y <- runif(200) Z <- rnorm(200) given.Z <- co.intervals(Z, number = 4, overlap = .25) coplot(Y ~ X | Z,

Hi, In kubevirt we are running into a strange permission problem on libvirt-5.0. We see transient "Permission Denied" errors when "virAuditSend" wants to send an audit log. [1] shows the logs of one of these containers. Here an example: {"component":"virt-launcher","level":"warning","msg":"Failed to send audit message

Hello, On KubeVirt, we are trying to pre-create a tap device, then instruct libvirt to consume it (via the type=ethernet , managed='no' attributes). It works as expected, **unless** when we create a multi-queue tap device. The difference when creating the tap device is that we set the multi-queue flag; libvirt throws the following error when consuming it: ``` LibvirtError(Code=38,

> On May 12, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > And cc'ing flac-dev. > >> On May 10, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Dave Rice <dave at dericed.com <mailto:dave at dericed.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >>> On May 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Andrew James Weaver <weevz at uw.edu <mailto:weevz at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10545 Summary: Rsync first time deletes files, second time it synchronates files with same name Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned

Hi, I was trying to make a mirror backup of a folder in my machine with the following command: rsync -avh --delete /source/ /destination But the extra files that where on "destination" didn't got deleted. Where as doing: rsync -avh --delete /source/ /destination/ worked as expected. I wonder if this is correct, or it shouldn't be like that. -------------- next part

So, I use procmail extensively, and I have for a long time, but marking messages as 'read' in a Maildir has always been a little wonky: TRAP='mv "$LASTFOLDER" "${LASTFOLDER}:2,S"' Since I've switched to dovecot, is there a way to mark a message on delivery as read or not new or seen? -- Clarke's Law: Sufficiently advanced technology is