similar to: Problem with permissions

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: Actually syslinux.efi seems to be using the implementation calling into UEFI via these functions: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/efi/tcp.c I've tried to add debug messages to these

Hi, I'm writing to you on behalf of the Pasteur Institute's (Paris, France) IT team. We're currently using dovecot-0.99.10.5_2 on a FreeBSD 5.3. We're planning to upgrade to dovecot-1.x with an openLDAP user and password database and patch it at the same time to include some authentication feature we're using : Since most of our user currently don't use dovecot at all and

I'm using OpenSSH_3.5p1 (server protocol 2.0 ) on a Compaq device V5.1A with C2 Security (SIA) configured. I must set UsePrivilegeSeparation to no to get this working. Does anyone have PrivilegeSeparation working on a Compaq device with C2 Security configured? Source device: ssh user at destination ( produces these errors) sshd: /var/tcb/files/__db_lock.share: Permission denied sshd:

On Nov 9, 2004, at 10:26 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> wrote: > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:13:36 -0600 > From: Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> > Subject: Re: RedHat forks OpenSSH? > To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Message-ID: <20041109211336.GC1429068 at hiwaay.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii [deletion for

When -fstack-protector is turned on, linker fails to find the symbol "__stack_chk_guard" because at least for powerpc64le, glibc doesn't provide this symbol. Instead, they put the stack guard into TCB. x86 fixed this issue by injecting a special address space (which is later translated to TCB register access) and hard code the offset of stack_guard, but I don't see a easy way to

I found a bit weird to use address space for this, since the offset of getting stack_guard in TCB is, unfortunately, negative: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/rs6000/linux64.h#L610 In my understanding an address space is referring to a segment register (-on powerpc 32bit; or SLB entry on powerpc 64bit?) with a non-negative offset value, so that it's actually accessing

I'm curious about how one would go about contacting/hiring a samba developer to fix a bug, or implement a feature. I've got a particular bug in mind (1493), but it seems like it would be a good thing to know in general. Thanks, Mark Roach

I'll come up with a address-space-based proof of concept. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 17:05 Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:04 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> >> *To: *"Tim

Hi, an updated and more civilized post (to my one and only previous one) on getting OpenSSH to work on HP-UX 11 using the TCB. I used the HP ANSI C compiler. Firstly, I needed to download, compile and install OpenSSL, EGD and ZLib. Specific issues: configure did not handle hpux 11 login.c did not compile makefile did not use $(CFLAGS) sshd did not compile (pam issues), I wanted to use

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> > To: "Tim Shen" <timshen at google.com>, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org, "Hal > Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Kit Barton" <kbarton at ca.ibm.com> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 6:59:50 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [PPC] Linker fails on

Hi, currently I'm trying to extend my existing backup concept but I have issues due to symlinks. rsync has problems with symlinks. First some background information: I regularly back up my / and /home from my desktop PC and my netbook to my Synology DiskStation (500GB) using rsync 3.0.6 with this script: http://pastebin.com/m43d4e353 . This works without any error messages. On the DS

I have installed 2.5.1p1 on two systems, one running Digital Unix 4.0F and the other running Red Hat Linux 7.0. I am having trouble connecting using the 2.5.1p1 client and the version 2 protocol. Here is a connect attempt from the Linux box (this is after I blew away my ~/.ssh directory to make sure there was no "cruft" in it). Note that this also has the all zero key fingerprint that

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > TCP is the kernel's responsibility. I guess that these values get > copied into each TCB from the copy managed via proc at connection > start time, but never updated afterwards. > This had to happen but the question is why is it possible to increase a timeout but not to decrease it. --

I had a power hiccup yesterday and a server connected to a Best Ferrups 18KVA shutdown. The problem is that the UPS is reporting remaining runtime in minutes but nut treats it as seconds (so nut thought it only had 46 seconds left). Simple patch: diff -urN nut-2.2.1-dist/drivers/bestfcom.c nut-2.2.1/drivers/bestfcom.c --- nut-2.2.1-dist/drivers/bestfcom.c 2008-06-13 14:04:07.000000000 -0500

Well, after digging around and thinking some more, I'm giving up on the idea of preallocating a TTY to get post-auth privsep working on Tru64. I don't think it will work, because just allocating a TTY doesn't fix the problem - there's no valid way to tie that TTY back to the client process (because it hasn't requested a TTY yet and may not ever do so). The problem is that the

Hi, Well, I've just set up Samba + goodies to get my Red Hat (lisa) and WinME (homer) boxes connected and it all seems to be going rather well...except for one thing. I'm not even sure if this is supposed to happen but here's the deal. First up, my smb.conf file... ------------------------------------------------------------------- [global] domain logons = yes encrypt passwords =

If a user doesn't have a ~/mail directory and logs in, the directory is created for them. However, it is created with insecure permissions, 0770 (full group access). The problem is this bit in src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-storage.c: #define CREATE_MODE 0770 /* umask() should limit it more */ The code then uses CREATE_MODE as an argument to mkdir_parents(), but mkdir_parents()

This question is perhaps one you have seen before but I have not found an answer to as yet. Rsync uses cygwin1.dll as does openssh. Is there a more current compilation of openssh that uses a more current cygwin1.dll such that both rsync and openssh can function on the same version? This is important because of improvements made to cygwin1 that affect rsync speed. Thanks for your thoughts and

I am testing samba 3.0's net rpc vampire tool and am getting strange results... after I import the account info, the samba usernames seem to be mapping to hardcoded unix uid #'s instead of account names. For example: # pdbedit -u jah000 idmap uid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs idmap gid range missing or invalid idmap will be unable to map foreign SIDs

I know it is just after a release, but I'm trying to see how the regression tests look on Tru64. I hadn't had a chance to really look at them before because I didn't have sudo installed on Tru64 (now I do). Anyway, for the 3.9p1 release, all of them run except for a couple of problems: - agent-ptrace fails; it looks like setgid isn't enough to kill tracing under Tru64, and I