similar to: Copiying /etc/shadow with sudo and rsync

Hello Guys I installed Sims 3 with PlayOnLinux on Ubuntu. Everything worked but there is no text in Sims 3 at all. Like on this Screenshot (http://img340.imageshack.us/i/bildschirmfotoae.png/). My System Configuration is: Intel Core 2 vPro 2 x 2,4 GHz amd64 Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller -> Mobile Intel GM45 Express Chipset (Driver: i915) 4 GB

Hello list, With my latest proftpd server graphical client error on list (ls) directory: Error: Could not read from socket: ECONNRESET - Connection reset by peer Error: Disconnected from server Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing So far I've tried both filezilla and cyberduck. But command line ftp works completely: [dunphy at BAM-025715-TD:~] #ftp jfweb Connected to jfweb.

Hello list, I was able to get passive mode worked out. I'm really glad I was able to do this. I'm able to log into the ftp server, list directories, enter subdirectories and upload/download files. However my next task is to enable virtual users using mysql. I have installed proftpd-mysql and enabled the sql modules in the config. I found a good article on how to do this here:

Hello; Dedup on ZFS is an absolutely wonderful feature! Is there a way to conduct dedup replication across boxes from one dedup ZFS data set to another? Warmest Regards Steven Sim

Two servers, each have normal user umask values of 0077 and root umask values on 0022. On the first server (CentOS 5.4 i386) running sudo 1.6.9pl7-5 (from base), here are the results of touching a file as a user, as root and as a user sudoing to root: user: touch file - result is 600 root: touch file - result is 644 user: sudo touch file - result is 644 On the second server (CentOS x86-64)

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.32 Severity: normal It seems when someone runs a sudo command on my system, logcheck misses it. The second line of /etc/logcheck/violations.d/sudo matches them, but the /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-sudo kills them. Furthermore, when users run commands like '$ sudo rm *' in a directory with lots of files, we reports with lines like: Jan 13

Hello Any time I am running sudo, I should have full path to the command, for example sudo /sbin/ifconfig Is there any way to set the path for sudo ? Thanks

Hi everyone, we just found out that when invoking puppet with sudo on redhat/centos (with no magic bash_completion), some providers don''t get recognized due to missing absolute path for the provider''s command. for example: useradd has in /usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/user/useradd.rb: commands :add => "useradd", :delete => "userdel",

http://sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/path_race.html [ODiP] == Dmitry Grigorovich

I did not understand the man pages for sudo and incorrectly interpreted the results. I interpreted the ALL to apply to all commands defined in the sudoers file. Basically, I'm an idiot, but here is the chain I followed, and the correct interpretation. In the man pages on sudo, it says the following: A User_List is made up of one or more usernames, uids (prefixed with

I've been trying to find an answer on other sites however I could not resolve my problem. spec: os: ubuntu 10.0, OpenSSH_5.5p1 Debian-4ubuntu4, OpenSSL 0.9.8o problem: When trying to restart deamons on remote pcs having the same specs, sometimes deamons are executed succesfully and sometimes not. I am using the following command: ssh -t -vvv "$host" 'sudo

Hi, using the attached script to implement an incremental rotating backup of my home directory works fine if I run it myself, however if it is run as root the -- link-dest fails and all files are recreated rather than linked to. Can someone explain the problem to me? I'm using rsync version 2.6.5 on Darwin Kernel Version 8.1.0 (OS X Tiger) Thanks, Simon.

Just wondering if anyone out there is using sudo across a bunch of machines and has a system/script for painlessly distributing a master sudoers file? is it as easy as a daily cronjob running wget/scp/rsync?

Hi Folks, am fairly new to wine and linux. I do not have sudo permissions on my box. would like to know if there is some other way of installing wine ?(probably a zip distribution that would just require me to untar/unzip) or a hack? Please help. thanks!

Howdy folks, I'm having an issue with sudo not recognizing nested groups via AD and winbind. I have an AD group called UnixAdmins and when I ad and AD account *directly* into this group, I am able to use sudo just fine as it is in the sudoers. *but* say I have a nested group in UnixAdmins like CustomerUsers or whatnot it won't recognize. Now, I also restrict access via pam.d systems-auth

I've done everything stated in the various guidance to get a regular user to use virt-manager (graphical Virtual Machine Manager) under CentOS 5.4 with KVM. Placing the user in the kvm group and changing permissions on several files to include kvm has not worked...the user still needs to enter the root password to use the graphical VMM. I thought of pressing sudo into service for this task.

I compiled the latest version of wine in Ubuntu 10.04. When I do sudo make install /usr/local/bin/wine --version still reports 1.3.31 instead of 1.3.34. However, the file date is today's! cmp shows this wine file is different from the wine in the git directory. Note that Winecfg is replaced by the new version. Any idea what's up with this?? Fernando

Alle, I know this is available somewhere and I've read it before but I can't seem to find it know that I need it (age is definitely catching up to me). I'm trying to find out the build parameters used with the current installation of sudo-1.6.7p5-30.1.3, specifically, whether "--with-ldap" was used. Sorry for the inconvenience. Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:535 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-535.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: sudo-1.6.7p5-30.1.1.x86_64.rpm src: sudo-1.6.7p5-30.1.1.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > Could there be some additional option required for development files? > Currently, I have CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release - maybe this doesn't > install headers? `make install' installs everything, always, no options required.