similar to: Delay for --remove-source-files

Hi, I'm using rsync to transfer some files from host A to B and using --remove-source-files to remove them from A after the transfer. Now however I have one file 'md5sum' which should be transfered but not removed. I tried the protect filter rule but this seems not to work in this case. All other ways I tried don't work either. Does anyone know how to do this using a single rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 Summary: Delta-transfer algorithm does not reuse already transmitted identical blocks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5801 Summary: Sparse (-S) option doesn't work with new files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

I am fairly new to ISCSI and SAN technology but having recently invested in the technology I am trying to find out exactly what can and can not be manipulated, filesystem wise, without requiring a reboot. I am using the inbuilt software ISCSI initiator and multipathing in CentOS 5.1. My steps so far. Create 10GB volume on SAN # iscsiadm -m session -R # fdisk /dev/mapper/mpath0 # kpartx -a

Hi, I detected a silly behaviour of rsync when new hardlinks of already synced files are created: Scenario: There are a local directory and a equal remote directory created by former run of rsync. Create a hardlink from a already existing file (both inside the local directory). If this hardlink has a filename with comes before the original filename when both are sorted in alphabetic order,

Hi list, I often save the content of a hardware device (a harddisk partition with a not-so-stable non-unix OS on it) on a backup disk which is connected over the network. Until now I used 'dd' to make a clone file of the device (dd if=/dev/hda2 of=disk.raw bs=2M) and then I copied or rsynced this file with the network copy. It would be nice if rsync would also be able to synchronise the

On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:38 PM, David Greene wrote: >>> So I thought about adding a pass that simply numbers Instructions, >>> have >>> DominatorTrees depend on that pass and then the dominates() question >>> can just >>> return whether one Instruction number is > the other. >>> >>> The number will get out of date as soon as

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Hi Micha, > > no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: > > 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 > > Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's > possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. >

Hi Guys, I'm backuping my home dir with rsync since 1 1/2 years, which is quite nice (I'm using the link-dir option). Now I started to use subversion and don't like that rsync is making backups of the checked-out working dirs. First I put all wd's in one folder (~/tmp) and put this on an exclude list. But now I'm use subversion on other locations as well, for example

On Friday 19 September 2008 17:50, Devang Patel wrote: > On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:38 PM, David Greene wrote: > >>> So I thought about adding a pass that simply numbers Instructions, > >>> have > >>> DominatorTrees depend on that pass and then the dominates() question > >>> can just > >>> return whether one Instruction number is > the

Hi everyone, i would like to have some suggestion about the most appropriate source client to use in conjunction with IceCast2 given few requirements: 1) the client should be able to handle multiple streams simultaneously and thus multiple resource folders (for music files). 2) the client should be able to be programmatically manipulated (scripting or API) and can thus provide a dynamic way to

On Friday 19 September 2008 17:28, Devang Patel wrote: > On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:20 PM, David Greene wrote: > > On Friday 19 September 2008 17:11, David Greene wrote: > >> What I'd really like to do is have Pass X re-run but not Pass Y. > >> Pass Y > >> only uses some bookkeeping from Pass X to speed itself up. Having > >> Pass X > >> not

Hi, I've been doing some tests using serialize() to a raw vector: df <- data.frame(runif(50e6,1,10)) ser <- serialize(df,NULL) In this example the data frame and the serialized raw vector occupy ~400MB each, for a total of ~800M. However the memory peak during serialize() is ~1.2GB: $ cat /proc/15155/status |grep Vm ... VmHWM: 1207792 kB VmRSS: 817272 kB We work with very

hi, i''m sure some of you had come across this problem before, but i was unable to find the answer after spending quite some time searching. i have a basic file uploader, code similar to rails recipe (or rails manual). problem occurs when i try to upload files (images) greater than 500KB. the largest file i could upload was 493KB and i''ve uploaded a bunch files under 490KB and

Dear R-experts, My problem is how to handle a 10GB data file containing genotype data. The file is in a particular format (Illumina final report) and needs to be altered and merged with phenotype data for further analysis. PERL seems to be an frequently used solution for this type of work, however I am inclined to think it should be doable with R. How do I open a text-file, line by line,

Presumably one could stream over the data twice, the first to get the size, without storing the data. Slower but more memory efficient, unless I'm missing something. Michael On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > Jorge, > > what you propose is not possible because the size of the output is > unknown, that's why a

Hi, we are using samba 3.0.24 as a printspooler for 80 network printers with a 500kB ntprinters.tdb for some years now. When we recently restarted samba we noticed that the ntprinters.tdb automatically shrinked to 24kB and printing was no longer possible. tdbdump of the original tdb-file is impossible too: "Failed to open ntprinters.tdb" The strange thing about this: we can solve

I just downloaded solaris. They have two versions, the split DVD that comes with two 1.2GB zipped chunks and an exe which is 1.2GB but uncompresses to the full 2.5+GB. I found some info on them here: http://www.nosltd.com/nosso.html Any idea how they achieve such great compression? Looks like they're using a proprietary algorithm and don't offer any downloads. Also looks like

Hi All, This one has me stumped, but I've done quite a bit of debugging to hopefully isolate it down enough. Basically, I hear an echo *delay* when I do a 'echo' test (key- there's an annoying delay). Here's what I have: Asterisk 1.0.3 current as of Dec 7. x100p (although, irrelevant in this case) (2) Cisco 7940's with 7.3 firmware All communications between asterisk and

Warren, one slight correction on an other wise nicely written bit of info: The time transmitted from WWV is not Mountain Time. Even though the WWV transmitter farm is located in the Mountain time zone, the signals are transmitted as "Coordinated Universal time", UTC, or 'Zulu' time. Here, you can listen to a recording made at the transmitter site for the 5Mhz signal: