similar to: Proposed tweaks

The current Debian distribution (AKA "lenny") install CD verstion "netinst" for i386 fails on an elderly gateway (details below) with the following message: ------------------ ISOLINUX 3.71 Debian-2008-09-06 isolinux: Loading spec packet failed, trying to |<-- screen wrap wing it ... isolinux: Failed to located CD-ROM device; boot failed. See http://syslinux.zytor.com/sbm

Hi, not sure if this is considered news, but I have been able to build OpenSSH 5.8p2 on mips-dec-ultrix4.5. On my system I have ULTRIX 4.5 with the latest Y2K patch kit as well as zlib-1.2.5, openssl-0.9.8m and prngd-0.9.29, several GNU utilities and gcc-3.0.4. To build openssh one has to check in various files if <sys/socket.h> and/or <netinet/ip.h> are multiply defined, because of

I've setup a lab to test the new tunneling options in the latest openssh. Things work well... for a while... then the tunnel goes unidirectional. openssh-SNAP-20060122.tar.gz lab1 config: # uname -a FreeBSD lab1 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 13 13:01:17 EST 2006 root@:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SMP i386 # cat /etc/sysctl.conf | egrep -v '(^#|^$)'

Why can't one use robocopy to do unidirectional replication from a Windows Domain Controller to a Samba Domain Controller? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Robocopy_based_SysVol_replication_workaround

Hi! I hope this list a good place for my question - I've googled for it first, but I didn't find any answers. I'm trying to use the new ssh IP tunnel feature to get a secure access to my machine at work, which is behind a firewall/NAT but it has a ssh port in outbound direction open. The problem is that the tunnel freezes occasionally, mostly in one direction only. The freeze

The setup: class Location::Base < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name :locations ... end class Location::Address < Location::Base ... end class Location::Airport < Location::Base ... end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :location, :polymorphic => true, :class_name => "Location::Base" ... end I want a unidirectional belongs_to relationship. That

Nadav (or anyone who is familiar with the loop vectorizer), Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? I am asking this because I would like to have loop vectorization disabled for targets that don't support SIMD instructions (for example, standard mips32). Loop vectorization

Hi, Would just like to inquire if anyone here has a setup of asterisk to send traffic to AS5400 connected to an SS7-PRI.? this is more of a AS54 question, as i've been reading and i always stumble upon PGW2200 as a requirement to handle SS7 signaling on the AS54. Has anyone able to send calls from asterisk to an as 54 with SS7-PRI without PGW2200? TIA Regards, Nhadie --------------

I have been looking for a way from the dialplan to inquire if there are any members in a queue. So what I want to do is if no users are members of a queue then I can send the call to a given extention. I have the queue setup all that is working. Just need to be able to send the call to a certain user if no-one is logged into the queue. How do I do that? Thanks Jerry

On 02/17/2013 03:21 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Although there's still some mail > duplication problem with maildir that doesn't log any errors about it. > I'm not sure why that happens. While you're around, Timo :-) I've had such an issue recently with 2.2.18, using Maildir, where emails were being replicated circularly creating more and more duplicate copies.

Per the announcement from the MVAPICH team, I am pleased to let you know that the MPI-IO support for Lustre has been integrated into the new release of MVAPICH, version 1.0. > - Optimized and high-performance ADIO driver for Lustre > - This MPI-IO support is a contribution from Future Technologies > Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. >

Hi all, is it possible to get rrsync with the "--delete" option working? Or is the rsync server really started unidirectional in this special scenario? Regards. JS -- GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

Hello, With some trepidation I've come to inquire about platform requirements for * after having spent a couple of hours searching and browsing the archives and skimming the Handbook (very nice). I've found recommendations for 800-1000 Mhz and 128-256 MB RAM machines. My curiosity is not about what machine I need to start using * to support live comm ops. Rather, I want to know if a

Similar to commit a2ac99905f1e ("vhost-net: set packet weight of tx polling to 2 * vq size"), we need a packet-based limit for handler_rx, too - elsewhere, under rx flood with small packets, tx can be delayed for a very long time, even without busypolling. The pkt limit applied to handle_rx must be the same applied by handle_tx, or we will get unfair scheduling between rx and tx. Tying

Hi Nadav, On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Akira! > > > > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of > the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to > vectorize a loop? > > Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. > At the

I was trying to work through a PDC problem that I was having with 3.0.23a noted in bug 3964. I didn't know how to apply the offered patch and my distro, FC4, has not offered an update yet to 3.0.23b so I thought that I would revert to a previous version that is not affected by this bug. I forced an install of 3.0.23 samba, common, and client and now rpm reports that I have two versions of

Hi Akira! > > Does the current loop vectorizer inquire about the SIMD capabilities of the target architecture when it decides whether it is profitable to vectorize a loop? Yes, it uses a cost model to determine the profitability of vectorization. At the moment only x86 provides the necessary hooks that are needed for calculating the costs. We may need to change the cost defaults to

Hi All, We've been working on enhancing LLVM's instrumentation based profiling by adding indirect call target profiling support. Our goal is to add instrumentation around indirect call sites, so that we may track the frequently taken target addresses and their call frequencies. The acquired data has uses in optimization of indirect function call heavy applications. Our initial findings

Dear bug-busters, This week I've posted a message to the R-help mailing to inquire if anybody had experienced alike me. When I run the following GLM: glm(n~s+c+m, family=quasi(link=log, variance=mu)) several times using exactly the same dataset R crashes at random. I have tried to probe into the problem by tracking the response times of the above function with system.time (e.g.

Dear all, I would like to inquire, if it is a desired feature that the combination with rbind() of two data frames with factors columns does not sort the factors levels of the combined data frame. > str(rbind(data.frame(a = factor(c(4, 3))), data.frame(a = factor(c(2, 1))))) 'data.frame': 4 obs. of 1 variable: $ a: Factor w/ 4 levels