similar to: rsync 3.0.4 under cygwin: problems with --exclude

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:24:10PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > The remote rsync is running out of memory as it collects the CVS > ignore rules (add_rule). Something could be awry with the CVS ignore > rules, or the machine could just be low on memory. Please run rsync > again with -vvv (three verbose options), which will make the remote > rsync show (among other useful

I received the following bug report for the Debian rsync package today. I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in this way... Perhaps Wayne could comment? Paul Slootman On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > Rsync fails to push filters to the the remote host if the remote rsync > is older than the Debian's. I've tried to connect to a

Hi, I am running OS X Snow Leopard on the 'sender' side and Linux (2.6.32, possibly fedora but unsure) on the 'receiver' side. Both with rsync 3.0.9. If I run the following command from the command line: /usr/local/bin/rsync -av -e "ssh -i \ /Users/pedrofortunyayuso/.ssh/backup_pfortuny_net" \ --filter ': rsync.dirs' ~/ pfortuny at

Moin, I wrote a small backup script that use rsync: r5backup (http://sourceforge.net/projects/r5backup/). It backup dozen of unix machines for many people. But when I try to backup /var/lib/zope2.9 I get an error 11. It does not matter if zope is running or not. I can't see an error meassge in the (verbose) logfile: [client] parse_filter_file(/etc/r5backup/profiles/boulder.exclude,0,3)

Hello, this is my first wine-time, and a lot of winprograms run "out of the box" Great! But there is a little DOS-program which does not run. Where can I look for the error? Thanks for any hint. geo@toso:~> wine "c:\Program Files\saft\saft.exe" Warning: unprotecting the first 64KB of memory to allow real-mode calls. NULL pointer accesses will no longer be caught.

hi, All. I just compiled the latest rsync (2.6.9). but I'm getting an error when I use the -C option. eg: $ rsync -aCv host1:/home/john/data/ /home/john/data receiving file list ... ERROR: out of memory in add_rule [sender] rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) [sender=2.6.9] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes received so far) [receiver]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13467 Bug ID: 13467 Summary: an xattr filter rule is treated as a file filter rule on the remote side Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core

Summary: an xattr filter rule (e.g. --filter='-x! user.*’, which is suggested by the documentation) is treated as a file filter rule on the remote side. Repro #1, sender is local: host1$ rsync --filter=‘-x! user.*' -avvvHX --delete /tmp/test/. host2:test ... [Receiver] add_rule(-! user.*) Repro #2, sender is remote: host1$ rsync --filter=‘-x! user.*' -avvvHX --delete host2:test/.

Hi, We upgraded from rsync 2.6.8 to 3.0.6, and ran into a problem with P (protect) rules coming in from filter files. The rule works if given on command line, but if given via . (merge), it no longer works. The effect is that files are not sent to the destination any more. I verified the problem still exists in 3.0.9pre2. I don't think this is bug 8309

Any advice for an all around newbie. I have a rsync command that works just fine whenever I have executed it directly from the command line. /usr/local/bin/rsync -v -v -v -P --stats -z -r -t -p -l --delete --password-file=/export/home/webuser/.appprod --exclude "*.htaccess" /export/home/xternal/htdocs/ webuser at appprod::dprweb_www > /export/home/webuser/logs/rsync But when we

Hi again all.. When using rsync 3.0 to sync files between 2 local directories, it works as i expect it, but when the destination folder is a mounted smb share, it always copies over the files even though they already exist on the destination. Any ideas on why this is happening? even using the same options, but with a different destination path. I have tried using -vvv, but it doesn't make

Simon Josefsson wrote in <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I |> am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet |> crypto-armored implementation like fwknop.) | |I am reluctantly considering to use some kind of port knocking

Hi All, I am somewhat new to rsync and am looking for some guidance. I've been using it successfully for a couple months syncing CentOS updates from a university mirror with the following specs: rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 rsync -artv rsync://mirrors.usc.edu/centos/5.6/updates/i386/RPMS/--exclude=debug/ /var/www/html/centos/5/updates/i386 Everything works fine for this connection

Hi, I''ve been working the past 8 hrs combatting DDoS attacks on websites and dedicated servers I host for clients. They''re hitting one specific IP address, but coming from thousands of external IP addresses. I use: shorewall-4.0.10-3.noarch How can I tackle this? I''ve blocked many subnets in the blacklist file but it''s made very little difference. If

I believe I have encountered a nasty bug with rsync 2.6.6 "--delete-excluded" option. When this is enabled, rsync''s operation appears to break entirely. I have a script that I''ve been using for a few years. The script hasn''t changed in the last year or so. Recently I upgraded from SuSE 9.3 to SUSE 10.0 which means that I went from rsync 2.6.3 (+ patches,

Hi, I'm trying to figure out why when I do an rsync (Solaris, version 2.6.4 on both sides) from a site on the West Coast of the US to a site on the East coast, I keep getting directories updated when I use the command like this: # rsync -ar -v -v -i -O --force --delete --exclude=.snapshot --stats \ src:/sysic/lib/freedomlib_V100/ /sysic/lib/freedomlib_V100/ And I get output like this,

P.S.: Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20240707025234.j3oUaPFH at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in | <20240704180538.iV4uex29 at steffen%sdaoden.eu>: ||Simon Josefsson wrote in || <87jzi1fg24.fsf at kaka.sjd.se>: |||Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: |||> (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I

Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> writes: > (And since you mention "port knocking", I'd like to repeat how fond I > am of upgrading that original concept to a single-packet > crypto-armored implementation like fwknop.) I am reluctantly considering to use some kind of port knocking mechanism on some machines, however I really don't want to carry around shared

Hi, Got a strange problem with rsync ! Here is the story ... I got a linux rsync server running for 8 months without any problem (rsync 2.6.6 18) I got about a dozen of rsync clients (linux and windows, generally using a 2.6.5 rsync version) that synchronize their datas without any problem. Some of them only synchronize a few datas (10 GB) and some others synchronize large amount of data

Hi all, I am running Ubuntu server 10.04 and use rsync to do all my backups. I would like to backup multiple directories to my external hard drive, but I am faced with a problem on how to set up crontab -e to allow each rsync statement to perform one after the other. Right now I have each one set to run on different nights, but I would like them all to run the same night to allow for a more