similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6576] New: generate_files lists non-existent files

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6576] New: generate_files lists non-existent files"

2008 May 27
0
rsync hanging at "generate_files phase=1"
Hi, On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:45:20 +0100 Daniel Maher wrote: >> I am experiencing a (consistent, reproducible) condition whereby rsync >> is hanging indefinitely at the following stage : >> generate_files phase=1 > Eschewing the 2.6.9 that ships by default on Cygwin, I compiled Matt's > patched rsync 3.0.0 by hand and moved forward with that binary. After > trying
2008 Mar 21
3
rsync hanging at "generate_files phase=1"
Hello all, I am experiencing a (consistent, reproducible) condition whereby rsync is hanging indefinitely at the following stage : generate_files phase=1 The condition does not occur if --dry-run is specified - only when the run is "for real". Finally, i can scp the files without problems, so it is not a general connection issue, nor is it a problem with permissions (everything is
2019 Sep 12
0
Fw: Btrfs Samba and Quotas
Hello Joenes, below you find the output. I did not shorten it by tmpfs and the docker related entries. Are you working on fixing the Issue I described? Regards, Hendrik df -TPh Dateisystem Typ Gr??e Benutzt Verf. Verw%
2009 Nov 12
1
no valid partitiontables anymore
Hi, recently I had to shut down an iscsi-raid an the connected servers. After the reinstallation and changing the ip config to match our new lan design, I can login to the iscsi device, the volumes are there and I can establish an iscsi link to some volumes. But, some other volumes on the iscsi device are reported with an invalid partition table or that they can't be mounted. e.g.: fdisk
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2017 Sep 28
1
upgrade to 3.12.1 from 3.10: df returns wrong numbers
Hi, When I upgraded my cluster, df started returning some odd numbers for my legacy volumes. Newly created volumes after the upgrade, df works just fine. I have been researching since Monday and have not found any reference to this symptom. "vm-images" is the old legacy volume, "test" is the new one. [root at st-srv-03 ~]# (df -h|grep bricks;ssh st-srv-02 'df -h|grep
2014 Apr 15
1
CentOS 6 mount of ntfs formatted usb stick fails
I recently received an 8GB usb stick that fails to mount on my fully patched CentOS 6.5 desktop machine. The stick works just fine on a windoze 7 laptop (my daughter's) with no special drivers installed. fdisk -l /dev/sdf gives the following: Disk /dev/sdf: 8004 MB, 8004829184 bytes 102 heads, 38 sectors/track, 4033 cylinders Units = cylinders of 3876 * 512 = 1984512 bytes Sector size
2018 Jan 08
0
Replace NAs in split lists
I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] EK On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all-- > > I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given > there
2008 Oct 14
1
assert problem
rsync -rltpcvxH --progress --delete /mnt/sdf1/dvd . .... lots of stuff works, but then.... .... dvd/setdir/www/web_admin-1.0-noarch-001.tgz 1306806 100% 3.34MB/s 0:00:00 (xfer#927, to-check=1004/2734) dvd/setdir/xlibs/ deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gstreamer-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz deleting dvd/setdir/xlibs/gst_plugins_base-0.10.21-i586-001.tgz
2008 May 14
2
Dividing Two Dataframes
Hi, I have two dataframes one with 144 rows and 160 columns (SDF1) and one with 12 rows and 160 columns (SDF2). Now I'm trying to divide rows 1:12 with SDF2, rows 13:24 with SDF2, rows 25:36 with SDF 2, . In S-Plus the following code works fine: DFS = SDF1[1:144,1:60] / as.vector(SDF2[1:12,1:160]) but in R when I try to implement the formula I get the following error: "/
2003 Apr 22
0
RE: ext3 "noload" option to mount returning error in 2.4.9 & 2.4. 18 s eries kernel
It's already mounted rw somewhere else. This enables the needs_recovery feature which prevents an ext2 mount. -Leslie -----Original Message----- From: Christopher J. PeBenito [mailto:pebenito@ieee.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:30 AM To: kuczynski, leslie Cc: 'ext3-users@redhat.com' Subject: Re: ext3 "noload" option to mount returning error in 2.4.9 & 2.4.18 s
2018 Jan 08
0
Replace NAs in split lists
Because you need to separate the instructions with a ; (semi-colon). Hope this helps Rui Barradas Enviado a partir do meu smartphone Samsung Galaxy.-------- Mensagem original --------De: Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> Data: 08/01/2018 16:03 (GMT+00:00) Para: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>, r-help at r-project.org Assunto: Re: [R] Replace NAs in split lists Thank you
2018 Jan 08
0
Replace NAs in split lists
I don't know. You seem to be posting in HTML so your code is mangled. Can you post plain text and use the reprex package to make sure it produces the errorin a clean R session? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 8, 2018 8:03:45 AM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just >wondering why
2015 Aug 25
0
CentOS 6.6 - reshape of RAID 6 is stucked
Hello I have a CentOS 6.6 Server with 13 disks in a RAID 6. Some weeks ago, i upgraded it to 17 disks, two of them configured as spare. The reshape worked like normal in the beginning. But at 69% it stopped. md2 : active raid6 sdj1[0] sdg1[18](S) sdh1[2] sdi1[5] sdm1[15] sds1[12] sdr1[14] sdk1[9] sdo1[6] sdn1[13] sdl1[8] sdd1[20] sdf1[19] sdq1[16] sdb1[10] sde1[17](S) sdc1[21] 19533803520
2008 May 15
2
Adding columns to dataframe
Hi, I have a dataframe SDF1 that looks like this: Char1 Char2 Char 3 W.2007.02 W.2007.09 W.2007.16 W.2008.13 A C1 F1 F2 F3 A C2 F4 B C3 F5 F6 I have another dataframe SDF2 with 163 cols that has the following column names Char1 Char2 Char 3 W.2007.02 W.2007.03 W.2007.04
2010 Nov 10
1
quota broken for large NFS mount
Should I report this as a bug somewhere? Or is it just a problem with the old fedora box, probably fixed long ago and not relevant to the centos list? On the server side, theme4, a very old fedora box, exports t4d5 via NFS. t4d5 is big, has lots of space, and the user tobiasf has plenty of quota: [root at theme4 ~]# quota -vls tobiasf|grep sdf /dev/sdf1 1312G 4578G 4769G
2018 Jan 08
1
Replace NAs in split lists
OPS! Sorry i did indeed posted the code in HTML; should have known better. ifelse(is.na(z$Value),z$Value[!is.na(z$Value)][1],z$Value)z}) error. unexpected symbol in sdf2 On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > I don't know. You seem to be posting in HTML so your code is mangled. Can you post plain text and use the reprex package to
2018 Jan 08
2
Replace NAs in split lists
Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just wondering why if i put the whole code in one line, i get an error message. sdf2 <- lapply( sdf, function(z){z$Value <-ifelse(is.na(z$Value),z$Value[!is.na(z$Value)][1],z$Value)z}) error. unexpected symbol in sdf2 Thanks again EK On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: >
2018 Jan 08
0
Replace NAs in split lists
Upon closer examination I see that you are not using the split version of df1 as I usually would, so here is a reproducible example: #---- df1 <- read.table( text= "ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE NA 3 a ac FALSE NA 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE NA ", header=TRUE, as.is=TRUE ) sdf <- split( df1, df1$ID ) # note the extra [ 1 ]
2018 Jan 08
3
Replace NAs in split lists
Why do you want to modify df1? Why not just reassemble the parts as a new data frame and use that going forward in your calculations? That is generally the preferred approach in R so you can re-do your calculations easily if you find a mistake later. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >I just came