Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "difference between --no-implied-dir abd --keep-dirlinks ?"
2006 Feb 24
0
Improvements to man page for --no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks
Wayne,
Attached is a patch worth of suggested man page improvements for
--no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks. I think new users would find my
explanations clearer and more complete, although you may want to make
additional changes. I regenerated rsync.1 and the patch includes
changes to it, but my yodl is somewhat weird, so I suggest you run yodl
again yourself.
--
Matt McCutchen
2009 Oct 03
1
--keep-dirlinks --delete erroneously deletes symlinks to directories
Hi,
the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during,
--delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on
the receiver.
With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected.
(rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version, on Debian Lenny)
I don't think that this behaviour is intended.
Details/example:
- Host 1 directory-structure:
drwx------ ./1
2004 Aug 20
3
Using --keep-dirlinks : recursive symlinks problem
Hello folks,
trying to make use of the new --keep-dirlinks feature for a synch port;
it works excellent but feels incomplete without a way for rsync to
ignore recursive links.
Example:
# ls -la .
total 6
drwxrwxr-x 2 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:42 .
drwxrwxr-x 8 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:41 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 bldmstr staff 2 Aug 20 12:07 bogus -> ..
if you use
2011 Jun 28
2
rsync 3.0.6 and keep-dirlinks in daemon mode
Hello,
I'm trying to push some data from one machine to another via rsync
source machine uses rsync 3.0.8, it's a CentOS 5.6 Linux with rsync 3.0.8 package from rpmforge
destination machine uses rsync 3.0.6, it's a Scientific Linux 6.0 with rsync 3.0.6 from its repository
destination machine is running a rsync daemon with the following configuration:
log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log
2007 Apr 12
2
error on --copy-dirlinks shortform in manpage
Hi,
A minor bug in the manpage was noticed by a Debian user...
(Please keep the 418923-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the Cc list in
replies.)
diff -u -r1.399 rsync.yo
--- rsync.yo 23 Jan 2007 15:34:43 -0000 1.399
+++ rsync.yo 12 Apr 2007 19:30:17 -0000
@@ -724,7 +724,7 @@
also ignored. Using this option in conjunction with bf(--relative) may
give unexpected results.
-dit(bf(-K,
2008 Jul 07
1
RFE: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also
Hi,
I just read the thread
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-June/009678.html which
describes how --keep-dirlinks came to be. My use case is similar, but
I?d like a similar option for files as well.
Setup: in my public_html I have some symlinks which I send over as
files, with -L (for various reasons: partly, because they are copies of
current work which is done elsewhere, or
2009 May 02
1
The --relative option on remote machine to source machine ???
Hi,
I read below lines in rsync v3.0.5 for --relative option.
if you used this command:
rsync -av /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/
... this would create a file named baz.c in /tmp/ on the remote machine. If
instead you used
rsync -avR /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/
then a file named /tmp/foo/bar/baz.c would be created on the remote machine,
preserving its full path
It is also possible to limit the
2006 Aug 20
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4037] New: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037
Summary: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis
dirs
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2009 May 28
4
some files vanished before they could be transferred
Hi,
I am getting "rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be
transferred (code 24) at main.c(1039) [sender=3.0.6]" now frequently but
while using rsync version 2.6, I used to get it rarely. Any idea would be
helpful on why rsync 3.0.6 is throwing this warning frequently.
Jignesh.
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2009 Jan 20
8
find out the meaning of rsync error code
Hi,
Could anyone please tell me how to get the meaning of rsync error codes.
In "rsync return code: 12" error, what 12 indicates?
Thanks,
Jignesh
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2004 Sep 08
2
--keep-dirlinks in combination with --one-file-system
I've been using the --keep-dirlinks feature of 2.6.3pre1. I also
use -x (--one-file-system) and --delete-after.
The symlinked directories on the receiver are symlinked to a
partition other than the one where the target of the rsync resides
(that's the whole point of this nifty --keep-dirlinks feature).
I discovered that the symlinked directories are not being processed
for deletions.
2008 Jul 09
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5601] New: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601
Summary: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: hendrik.maryns@uni-tuebingen.de
2009 Mar 02
2
how rsync calculate Tranfer rate ??
Hi,
I am not sure how rsync calculates below statistics and how transfer rate
170583.48 bytes/sec ? Where is the total transfer time information? How
speedup is 1? How Total bytes written is 6567384? Could someone please give
me brief information on this.
Number of files: 4
Number of files transferred: 3
Total file size: 6566219 bytes
Total transferred file size: 6566219 bytes
Literal data:
2007 Nov 04
1
Keeping individual dirlinks
It would be nice if rsync offered a way to specify individual dirlinks
to keep without keeping all dirlinks. (Unison can do this.) For
example, consider the following command:
rsync -a --relative src/./ dest/
If rsync refrained from trimming a trailing /. off of source arguments
(at least as an option), one could keep a dirlink by passing it as an
additional source argument with a /. and
2008 Dec 16
2
Transfer mode
Hello Friends,
Could any one please tell me what is transfer mode and what are the transfer
modes available in rsync?
Thanks,
Jignesh
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2009 May 04
3
Problem with --fil
Hi, I am using below command.
rsync --verbose --log-file-format='%i %f %l %o %b'
--log-file='/tmp/myfile' src/ dest/
Though it is good that all the sync information contents will be redirected
to /tmp/myfile, it would be useful if rsync could print at least below final
statistics on stdout.
2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of files: 18
2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of
2013 Dec 02
2
symlink in -R src_dirlist and real dirs on target
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of directories to mirror via rsync. I have lots of
hardlinked files spread about these directories. Therfore I use -R
(--relative) and -H.
so far ok but:
I create symlinks to the source-directories via script because src-dirs
have changing names (date and time of backup) and I want to have constant
directory names on target. How can I achieve that?
I thought -k
2009 Jun 05
1
could not make way for new symlink !!!
Could any one please help me to get rid of below errors?
ERROR: DoRsync(): rsync had errors or failed
rsync return code: 23
could not make way for new symlink: bin
could not make way for new symlink: etc
could not make way for new symlink: include
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous
errors) (code 23) at main.c(1505)
2009 Sep 01
1
rsync and symlinks
Hi, I have one question regarding handling of symlinks in rsync. If I have
/source directory in which I have 100s of sub directories of directories and
each one has symlink to some directories out side the /source directory
hierarchy. Does rsync follows all those symlinks and syncs the data if I
specifies below rsync command?
rsync -avz /source/ remote.ky:/source/
source
|
| - source1
2008 Dec 10
0
File System walk in rsync
Hello Friends,
Could any atleast one tell me how rsync walk the complete File System and
when it start actual synching?
Thanks,
Jignesh
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jignesh Shah <jignesh.shah1980@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major
> change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and