similar to: Results table and heap statistics

Hi all! I've got a question about rsync using the MD5 algorithm. I know that rsync makes blocks of a file and then compares the checksums of each block. If the checksum is unequal the block is tranfered. Otherwise it could be that the checksum is the same but the block is different. Therefor rsync uses a 128 BIT MD5 algorithm. Now, at what filesize is it better to check the whole file

I am trying to copy an 8 gig file. After first copying it over I try and rsync it again. There are no changes so why is it copying the file over again? Here is the output of what I am trying to do. And what does speedup mean? [root@VMWARE Storage]# rsync --verbose --recursive -t --stats -- progress ntapps.dsk vmware2::home/ [root@VMWARE Storage]# rsync --verbose --recursive -t --stats --

I really want to thank you for taking time to help me with this. I have changed the rsyncd.conf as per you suggestion below. I have several different systems that sync to the server and today they were showing this Number of files: 25832 Number of files transferred: 78 Total file size: 49441191919 bytes Total transferred file size: 37421120 bytes Literal data: 36955331 bytes Matched data:

Hi there, I am running rsync-3.0.6-12.el6.x86_64 on a centos 6.6 box. Am trying to get files from a remote server (centos 6.5) to my local machine. It appears to connect fine, but does not transfer any file. this is what I am seeing [youcantoo at testbox home]# rsync -avvvzh -P --stats --delete servername::backupdir/ /home/findmoore opening tcp connection to servername port 873 sending daemon

I got this mail from a cronjob and can't figure out what is causing rsync to crap out on me. I received the message at 5:03, when the cron job is scheduled to run at 4:00, so total runtime is approximately an hour. Machine that is fetching the files is a low-end G3 running Yellowdog 3.01, rsync --version 2.5.5. It has only 128 megs of ram, but isn't doing anything else. Transfers are

Hello, I've had some problems using rsync to transfer directories with more than 3 million files. Here's the error message from rsync: <snip> ERROR: out of memory in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(116) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (63453387 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code

Hi guys, my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS 6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2. The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for example on the node "node6.blade"): 1) GFS2 hangs (processes go in D state) until node6.blade get

Hi Sebastian, It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by avoiding early reduction of infinite spill cost nodes via R1 or R2. To illustrate why the early reductions can be a

Im running into an issue with exclude options not working correctly. Here are the details, if anybody can see what Im doing incorrectly, please let me know.. Thanks rsync version 2.5.7 protocol version 26 Command: "/usr/bin/rsync""--archive""--compress""--delete""--group""--perms""--st

Here's my command copied from a shell script:\ rsync --verbose --progress --stats --compress --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --recursive --times --perms --links \ /home/* trt@xxxxxx.xxxxxxx.xxx:/remotebackups/ Here's some (a small part) of the output: jk/.recently-used 253 100% 0.00kB/s 0:00:00 rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "jk/.secpanel/.runfiles": Permission denied (2) stat

hello all, i'm using rsync-2.5.4-2 on redhat 7.3 in order to rsync some data from a MS-WIN$ share, i use the following procedure -- first, i use the following to mount the SMB share : mount -t smbfs -o password=satish //satsco/satish /home/2 then, after successfully mounting the share, i am using the following to rsync the data into redhat linux : rsync -arlpogtb --whole-file

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

Here is the structure of my servers : Source : /home/test1/link_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... sub_dir2 ... Destination: /home/test2/real_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... subdir2

Hello, i'm a newbie of the really fantastic "R" , but have some problems to define Missing Values from Spss-Files which i import with the read.spss(data) command ! What should i do to recode i.e. the values 9,99 & 999 to NA. Something like this x <- c(9,99,999,NA) x==NA ...do not what i want, because the data.frame show the values 9,99 & 999 and not NA in this fields ?

Hi, I'm sometimes getting a failure of connecting 2 nodes when Tinc is started and configured in a LAN. In the logs, there are some unexpected dropped packets with very high or negative seq. I can reproduce this issue ~2% of the time. When this happens, the 2 nodes can no longer ping or ssh each other through the tunnel interface but using eth0 works fine. The connection can recover after at

windows() plot(1,1) windows() plot(1:2,1:2) dev.list() # we have devices 2 and 3 # device 3 is active and in front bringToTop(2) # does not work bringToTop(3) # does not work also Regards Jens Oehlschlaegel --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = i386-pc-mingw32 arch = x86 os = Win32 system = x86, Win32 status = major = 1 minor = 2.1 year = 2001 month = 01

I don't know whether this belongs to r-devel or rather r-help. Under RW1.11 --nsize=8M --vsize=512M I could n <- 500000 m <- 20 x <- matrix(rnorm(n*m), ncol=m, nrow=n) gc() > n <- 500000 > m <- 20 > x <- matrix(rnorm(n*m), ncol=m, nrow=n) > gc() free total (Mb) Ncells 8190509 8388608 160 Vcells 57033698 67108864 512 # under RW1.20 --vanilla

hello all, we are developing and porting vorbis1decoder on a 24 bit platform. in the process we came across somedoubts about node bytes and leaf words. from the specification we got that we are arranging the huffman codeword tree into an array. the nodebytes are the number of bytes that are required to represent a node and leafwords are the no. of bytes required to represent the leaf i.e the

hi kuhlen, what you said is correct. i am talking about how you are going to arrange these codewords into an array, i.e. in the function _make_decode_table. there he uses node bytes and leaf words for memory management. i got a 24 bit platform. so if i assume that max. codeword length that could be possible as 24 bits can i allocate a memory of (2 * used entries - 2), to arrange the whole tree in

On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:28 +1100, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return > infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost > solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should > always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by > avoiding early reduction of