similar to: Parallel rsync

While I think the end goal you're describing is close to the correct one, I see the high-level strategy for getting there somewhat differently: 1) The code generators are only one collection of function passes that might be parallelized. Many others might also be parallelized profitably. The design for parallelism within LLVM's pass management infrastructure should be sufficiently generic

Please see Shuxin's proposal on "parallelizing post-IPO stage". It seems the two projects are related. Evan On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:33 AM, "Wan, Xiaofei" <xiaofei.wan at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, community: > > For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module,

Yes, the purpose is similar, we started this job from last year; But it Shuxin's solution is module based (correct me if I am wrong), we tried this solution and failed for many reasons, it is described in my design document https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QSkP6AumMCAVpgzwympD5pI3btPJt4SRgjY-vhyfySg/edit?usp=sharing we need discuss two solution and compare them, then adopt one solution

Hi, community: For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module, please see the details of the design and provide your feedbacks on below aspects, thanks! 1. Is this idea the proper solution for my requirement 2. This new feature will be enabled by llc -thd=N and has no impact on original llc when

I am using rsync on an unreliable mobile WAN connection, which causes rsync receiver to hang for long time, when connection is broken during transfere. As the option "--timeout=" here does not hit for me, is there a recommended "best" method to detect such scenario ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

-----Original Message----- From: Shuxin Yang [mailto:shuxin.llvm at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 1:50 AM To: Wan, Xiaofei Cc: Evan Cheng; Shuxin Yang; LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu) Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [LLVM Dev] [Discussion] Function-based parallel LLVM backend code generation On 7/16/13 7:23 AM, Wan, Xiaofei wrote: > Yes, the purpose is similar, we

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Wan, Xiaofei <xiaofei.wan at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, community: > > For the sake of our business need, I want to enable "Function-based parallel code generation" to boost up the compilation of single module, please see the details of the design and provide your feedbacks on below aspects, thanks! > 1. Is this idea the proper solution for

Hi there, I have a problem syncronizing a windows machine with a linux box. I want to backup the "My Documents" folder. Therefore I burned the data on a cdrom because the windows pc is only connected over a slow wan connection to the linux box. When I copy the data to the users home directory (using samba and another windows pc) and run the rsync program all the files are copied once

I use rsync for backing up user data, profiles, important network shares etc. (from several locations over WAN). Overall it works flawlessly, as it transfers only changes, but sometimes there are some serious hiccups. Suppose this scenario, suppose it's 1 GB of files: user shares: /home/joe/data/file1 /file2 /... /file1000 Now the user

Hi I have a file system that contains millions of small files. Since I backup it everyday with rsync using slow WAN link, I think it will be nice that if rsync can do this: An option that let rsync only check with remote rsync daemon about local files that has last modification time newer than one day ago (so is modified since yesterday backup). This can greatly reduce the WAN traffic. Is this

On 7/16/13 7:23 AM, Wan, Xiaofei wrote: > Yes, the purpose is similar, we started this job from last year; > But it Shuxin's solution is module based (correct me if I am wrong), we tried this solution and failed for many reasons, it is described in my design document > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QSkP6AumMCAVpgzwympD5pI3btPJt4SRgjY-vhyfySg/edit?usp=sharing > > we need

Hi, I have a Maildir store (about 500 GB) on a linux (redhat 8) server which I am trying to mirror to another identical server. I have 4 GB of ram on both machines. I am using rsync 2.5.5. At present the machines are on the same lan (100Mbit). Everytime I run the rsync, it runs for a short amount of time, (anywhere from 5-20 minutes) and then one of the machines (either the source or the

Folks- Just wanted to plug a totally awesome software package from a group I know: UDR (UDT Enabled Rsync). For those not familiar with UDT, it is a low level network protocol based on UDP that allows for high speed transfers over high latency WAN networks: http://udt.sourceforge.net/ For a while the UDT API was available, developed by the Laboratory for Advanced Computing at the

Hi, I have been running Shorewall (v 2.0.15 nowadays) for some time to act as a firewall between my LAN and my ISP where I have a fixed IP WAN address. Recently, I got an allocation of a /28 range of public IPs to do a DMZ. The ISP tells me that they are routing the /28 range via the existing WAN address. The WAN address is not part of the /28 range. This setup should be fairly simple, from

This has been a consideration. But it pains me that a tiny change/addition to the rsync option set would save much time and space for other legit use cases. We know rsync very well, we dont know ZFS very well (licensing kept the tech out of our linux-centric operations). We've been using it but we're not experts yet. Thanks for the suggestion. /kc On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:07:05PM

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

The second part of my patch series to fix the handling of addr_assign_type for random MAC addresses. This contains the trival changes from random_ether_addr() to new eth_hw_addr_random() and code to reset the state to NET_ADDR_PERM as soon as the MAC get changed via .ndo_set_mac_address where eth_mac_addr wasn't used. Danny Kukawka (2): net: replace random_ether_addr() with

The second part of my patch series to fix the handling of addr_assign_type for random MAC addresses. This contains the trival changes from random_ether_addr() to new eth_hw_addr_random() and code to reset the state to NET_ADDR_PERM as soon as the MAC get changed via .ndo_set_mac_address where eth_mac_addr wasn't used. Danny Kukawka (2): net: replace random_ether_addr() with

The second part of my patch series to fix the handling of addr_assign_type for random MAC addresses. This contains the trival changes from random_ether_addr() to new eth_hw_addr_random() and code to reset the state to NET_ADDR_PERM as soon as the MAC get changed via .ndo_set_mac_address where eth_mac_addr wasn't used. Danny Kukawka (2): net: replace random_ether_addr() with

I am running rsync in cygwin on windows. I am attempting to backup a somewhat large data store (750GB) to a remote site. As its windows and preserving permissions exactly is important, I have an iSCSI drive mounted on the local system across a somewhat slow WAN link (IE, it would take about 3 months to copy the datastore over it). Unfortunately, since this appears as a "local" copy to