similar to: Run rsync through intermediary server with SSH

Hi all! I've got a question about rsync using the MD5 algorithm. I know that rsync makes blocks of a file and then compares the checksums of each block. If the checksum is unequal the block is tranfered. Otherwise it could be that the checksum is the same but the block is different. Therefor rsync uses a 128 BIT MD5 algorithm. Now, at what filesize is it better to check the whole file

Hi all, We use rsync to move data from various devices to a single server. Each of these devices is powered off regularly (at least every day). On the server, rsync 3.0.5 is started from xinetd with the --daemon argument. The clients run rsync 3.0.4, protocol 30 (on ARM). Today I noticed several rsync processes (23 to be exact) running on the server since as long back as November 2009

Hello all, We're using rsync to move files from a server to a client (an embedded device, connected over GPRS) using a cron script on the client. To accomplish this, we use the --delete-source-files option. As I found in the archives, this doesn't remove any folders. Is there a way to have rsync remove the folders as well? As all data flows over the internet, we encrypt it using an SSH

I am trying to test a trivial configuration of 2 hosts, each of which has a simple 1-brick volume, that I wish to geo-rep from one to the other. When I first experimented with this a couple years ago, it worked, but that effort ended prematurely and I never finished the real setup. I am coming back to it now for other purposes. I'm on Fedora 39 with gluster 11.1. I'm using this guide:

Hi Karl, I don't see anything mentioning shared storage in the docs and I assume it's now automatic but can you check 'gluster volume get all cluster.enable-shared-storage' ? I would give a try with RH's documentation despite it's old it has some steps (like the shared volume) that might be needed:

On 8/18/24 16:41, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > I don't see anything mentioning shared storage in the docs and I > assume it's now automatic but can you check 'gluster volume get all > cluster.enable-shared-storage' ? > I would give a try with RH's documentation despite it's old it has > some steps (like the shared volume) that might be needed I appreciate the

Thanks for your response (6 months ago!) but I have only just got around to following up on this. Unfortunately, I had already copied and shipped the data to the second datacenter before copying the GFIDs so I already stumbled before the first hurdle! I have been using the scripts in the extras/geo-rep provided for an earlier version upgrade. With a bit of tinkering, these have given me a file

I have a client with an older server that is running into a weird file locking problem. The server is running FC2, samba 3.0.7 and kernel 2.6.10. They have recently installed AutoDesk Revit, which is apparently some sort of collaborative design software. Revit keeps a central repository and then allows different clients to access it. What is happening is that only the person who created the

Hello, I want to make an 2D plot of .xyz data. So plot on x-axis and y-axis and use a color scale for the z. For every x-location along a cross section of the soil at several depths a resistivity must be displayed. This must result in a picture/graph which shows the resistivity for that cross section. The depths differ for each x-location. How can I do that? In fact it is an cross

Good morning people, I try to create a master file on a samba share (Linux server, serving files via the Samba protocol). I have write-access on the folder and saving a 'normal' revit file works perfectly. However, when I try to save a master file (checking the checkbox in options), I get the error: Unable to write, it is read only or opened by somebody else. "Encountered

I have a Digium TDM400P card with 1 FXS and 1 FXO module running on my FreeBSD 6.0 server. While I am on the road, I would like to save on costs by using a soft-phone from my laptop to call in to a telephone connected to this card. I installed both Asterisk and Zaptel drivers from the ports, but still haven't done anything with the configuration files. What else do I require, and what is

Did the logs provide any hints as to what the issue may be? Diego On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to look into this. Since we needed downtime > due to the gluster update, we also updated the OS, including samba. We > went from 4.2.x to 4.4.4 and many other packages for CentOS were > updated as well. OS

Hello everyone I had samba 4.1 working as a member server to a windows 2012 AD in a test environment for a while now until I had to re-install the windows server from scratch. I have the new AD setup with the same NETBIOS name but now I have problems re-joining the samba box to the new AD. It looks like a DNS issue but I am unable to understand why. After the ire-install, I got a new Kerberos

Hello, I understand that only the destination of a call should do jitter buffering. So, if IAX2/PhoneA calls IAX2/PhoneB through my server (no transfers), PhoneA and PhoneB need to perform their own jitter buffering, and Asterisk will just forward the frames, correct? What happens if the peer does not support jitter buffering, but is close by so there's no need for jitter buffering? My

Is it possible to a configure a tinc (1.0.35) node to only send outbound through specific nodes, rather than trying to establish direct connections? I have a node which can connect to all the others directly, but some routes have terrible packet loss, so I'd like to configure it not to try. thansk Hamish

On 22/9/20 4:44 pm, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Is it possible to a configure a tinc (1.0.35) node to only send > outbound through specific nodes, rather than trying to establish > direct connections? > > I have a node which can connect to all the others directly, but some > routes have terrible packet loss, so I'd like to configure it not to try. Anyone? Should I just

On 7/10/20 2:45 pm, Erich Eckner wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > On 22/9/20 4:44 pm, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >> Is it possible to a configure a tinc (1.0.35) node to only send > outbound through specific nodes, rather than trying to establish > direct connections? > >> > >> I have a node which can connect to all

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On 22/9/20 4:44 pm, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >> Is it possible to a configure a tinc (1.0.35) node to only send outbound >> through specific nodes, rather than trying to establish direct connections? >> >> I have a node which can connect to all the others directly, but some

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm doing some basic operations on large sparse matrices, for example getting a row. it takes close to 30 seconds on a 3Ghz machine, and shots the memory usage up to the sky. I suspect there are dense intermediary steps (which, if true would defeat the purpose of trying to use sparse representaitons). As much as I try understanding the

Hi everyone, Is there anything else we could do to check on this problem and try to fix it? The issue is definitively related to either the samba vfs gluster plugin or gluster itself. I am not sure how to pin it down futher. I went ahead and created a new share in the samba server which is on a local filesystem where the OS is installed, not part of gluster: # mount | grep home ]# ls -ld /home