similar to: changes in rsync V3

Hello Friends, Could any atleast one tell me how rsync walk the complete File System and when it start actual synching? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jignesh Shah <jignesh.shah1980@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Friends, > > I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major > change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and

Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping that file/dir in case of ESTALE error. Jignesh. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, Could anyone please tell me how to get the meaning of rsync error codes. In "rsync return code: 12" error, what 12 indicates? Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, While researching on where rsync-3.0.6 spending more time when we have huge number of files in directory(~1000K files). I got below statistics: 2009/05/28 19:05:38 [9660] building file list . . . 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files: 724591 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files transferred: 5674 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Total file size: 63492447862 bytes 2009/05/28

Hi, I am not sure how rsync calculates below statistics and how transfer rate 170583.48 bytes/sec ? Where is the total transfer time information? How speedup is 1? How Total bytes written is 6567384? Could someone please give me brief information on this. Number of files: 4 Number of files transferred: 3 Total file size: 6566219 bytes Total transferred file size: 6566219 bytes Literal data:

Hi, I have one question regarding handling of symlinks in rsync. If I have /source directory in which I have 100s of sub directories of directories and each one has symlink to some directories out side the /source directory hierarchy. Does rsync follows all those symlinks and syncs the data if I specifies below rsync command? rsync -avz /source/ remote.ky:/source/ source | | - source1

Hi, I am getting "rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(1039) [sender=3.0.6]" now frequently but while using rsync version 2.6, I used to get it rarely. Any idea would be helpful on why rsync 3.0.6 is throwing this warning frequently. Jignesh. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, I have gone through the rsync documentation and also tested same both --no-implied-dir and --keep-dirlinks options. My question is what is the difference between these options in below scenario? I have /foo/bar is the symlink to /foo/baz at source and same directory structure with symlink is there at destination. When I sync the data from /foo/bar/* with --relative option specified, I am

Hi Friends, Does rsync V3 has the feature for logging the files which have not been transferred? Its already logs the file which have been transfered. Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hello Friends, Could any one please tell me what is transfer mode and what are the transfer modes available in rsync? Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, I am using below command. rsync --verbose --log-file-format='%i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/myfile' src/ dest/ Though it is good that all the sync information contents will be redirected to /tmp/myfile, it would be useful if rsync could print at least below final statistics on stdout. 2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of files: 18 2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of

Hi, I read below lines in rsync v3.0.5 for --relative option. if you used this command: rsync -av /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ ... this would create a file named baz.c in /tmp/ on the remote machine. If instead you used rsync -avR /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ then a file named /tmp/foo/bar/baz.c would be created on the remote machine, preserving its full path It is also possible to limit the

Could any one please help me to get rid of below errors? ERROR: DoRsync(): rsync had errors or failed rsync return code: 23 could not make way for new symlink: bin could not make way for new symlink: etc could not make way for new symlink: include rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1505)

--timeout=TIMEOUT This option allows you to set a maximum IO timeout in seconds. If no data is transferred for the specified time then rsync will exit. The default is 0, which means no timeout. Could anyone please tell me why IO timeout occures..in other words, why data could not be transferred in 12 hours? BTW, I have not set IOTIMEOUT from rsync but still it has been existing.

Hi, I was in under impression that rsync 3.0.5/3.0.6 creates all the missing directories in the path but I think I am wrong. Could any one tell me is it possible to create all missing dirs in path at destination side if not exists. Currently, I have been getting below errors. rsync -avz /tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ desthost:/tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ sending

Hi, Could any one please let me know if there is anyway to overwrite the log-file if it already exists. I want /tmp/mylogs/myfile file to be overwritten each time below command executes. rsync -av -ii file-format='MyLogs: %i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/mylogs/myfile' Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hello Friends, We are using rsync 2.6 and planning to switch to rsync 3.0.4 latest version. Could anyone tell me how would I get latest rsync version executable for unix different platform like sparc, i86 and linux? Also how would I know what are the changes made in rsync2.6 to rsync3.0.4? Thanks in advanced, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, I came across --relative option in rsync 3.0.5 and that looks awesome option through which we can avoid "CD" usage in base directory. Suppose I want to sync the file from /foo/bar/baz/* to /tmp/bar/baz/ then we have been using wrapper script that do "cd /tmp" before executing "rsync --relative /bar/baz/. /tmp/" command. But I could see that we could avoid using

Hi, I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. Source Dest ---------- --------- /foo/bar/ /foo/bar/ | -> baz | -> baz | -> xyz | -> xyz | ->

Hi, I have been using rsync-3.0.6 to sync my huge file system and it works awesome. I have been getting really annoying lots of errors about "file has vanished". We thought on getting rid of this and realized that having snapshot support in rsync would make things much easier. Could you please let me know if there is any way to get rid of this error message in rsync-3.0.6? If not then