similar to: Current status of --inplace?

Darryl Cook wrote: Hello, I need help with Samba and windows 2000. I had samba working fine with win95 and win98 but when i upgraded to 2000 i cant connect anymore. I have gone through all the tests and everything works fine until test #9 which is to run netview \\server_name and test #10 which is net use x: \\server_name\user I am running samba 1.9.18p7. When I do a net view

Wayne, I noticed that rsync will let me apply a non-inplace batch file in inplace mode. This corrupts the destination file if the batch file copies any data forward (from earlier offsets to later ones). Of course, the post-transfer checksum detects the corruption and gives the "ERROR: <file> failed verification" message, but rsync doesn't give the user a clue why the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201 Summary: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

I''m having issues handling output of a inplace editor function. When the controller action is successful, it returns the new value that populates the DIV and all is well. When it fails, it sends a js alert to the user. The problem is, after it sends the alert (and the user clicks OK) it then spits back the try/catch javascript code which gets inserted into the DIV. I''ve tried

Hi, I wanted to know if it''s possible to integrate FCKEditor with the inplace editor, and is it possible to have comboboxes too? If yes, could you give me some quick directions? Thanks a real lot, Blaise Bernier

Hello Everyone, I am don''t know if this is known issue. AJAX autocomplete and Inplace Editor Functional test examples are not working in FireFox 1.5.1. Same files are running perfectly in IE 6. error show at line new Ajax.Autocompleter(''ac1'',''ac1update'',''_autocomplete_result.html''); error is "Ajax.Autocompleter is not a

hi, is it possible to enable efficient treatment of sparse files along with -u -inplace option? the algo could fall back to regular logic for -S. thanks, javed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20140325/89c0d9a3/attachment.html>

Hi All! A feww weeks ago I upgraded one of my customers from 2.2.7a to 2.2.12. I chose the download and compile for 2.2.12 so that I had full control over what was going on and where the new version would live. This went very well until I found missing bits and pieces like smbpasswd etc etc. They live in new places on 12! I could quite happily swap between the two versions by killing the smbd

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ard@waikato.ac.nz

Mark, The patch seems to cause problems if there are any transfer interruptions (as mentioned in the comments in the patch). However, even on a retransfer, the earlier partially transferred file is not fixed, although the client appears to think the transfer has completed successfully. This appears to be a serious bug. Note: Both client and server have the inplace patch, and on Linux platforms

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218 Summary: inplace-if-low-disk Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: baldvin@angel.elte.hu QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2218 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-02-13 22:17

I'm trying to rsync a very large (62gig) file from one machine to another as part of a nightly backup. If the file does not exist at the destination, it takes about 2.5 hours to copy in my environment. But, if the file does exist and --inplace is specified, and the file contents differ, rsync either is so significantly slowed as to take more than 30 hours (the longest I've let an

Hi, I frequently rsync larger files from my rented server to my PC. Sometimes I have to stop the rsync process and restart it a while after (e.g. I'm shutting down my PC for the night, ...), sometimes several times per source file. I like the two following features: (1) The unfinished files should stay in a own directory (I call it '.dl'). I'm talking here about the 'temp'

Hi, I need to use rsync with options inplace and no-whole-file, but have problems with transfers of large files being frequently interrupted. partial-dir could be the solution, but it does not work with inplace-updating of destination files. I am thinking of doing the sync in two steps: 1) sync with --partial-dir and --backup-dir to send updated files to a different directory at the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7823 Summary: Documentation enhancement for --inplace option Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: erik at logtenberg.eu

Hi I am extending my ZFS+rsync backup to be able to handle large files (think virtual machine disk images) in an efficient manner. however, during testing I have found a very strange behavior of --inplace flag (which seems to be what I am looking for). what I did: create a 100MB file, rsync, snapshot, change 1k in random location, rsync, snapshot, change 1K in other random location, repeat a

Ok, thanks. I removed --inplace and --append-verify and kept --link-dest and --partial. And now the script works exactly as I want: hard-links are not updated, the script is still robust and can copy large files over unstable links etc, etc. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are you specifying --partial-dir? Seems like that would be needed or else you will end up would end up with an incomplete copy in the previous target? On 12/26/2014 06:50 PM, Askar Safin wrote: > Ok, thanks. I removed --inplace and --append-verify and kept > --link-dest and --partial. And now the script works exactly as I > want: hard-links

I don't specify --partial-dir. As you can see from the script, rsync at first copies to "in-progress", and then renames this to (for example) 2014-12-01-000000. So, if rsync interrupts, then at the next run the script will end "in-progress" (all partial files will be done) and then will rename this dir to 2014-12-01-000000. So, there never will be partial files in finished