similar to: Using Rsync in Wan Network

Hi I have a file system that contains millions of small files. Since I backup it everyday with rsync using slow WAN link, I think it will be nice that if rsync can do this: An option that let rsync only check with remote rsync daemon about local files that has last modification time newer than one day ago (so is modified since yesterday backup). This can greatly reduce the WAN traffic. Is this

Folks- Just wanted to plug a totally awesome software package from a group I know: UDR (UDT Enabled Rsync). For those not familiar with UDT, it is a low level network protocol based on UDP that allows for high speed transfers over high latency WAN networks: http://udt.sourceforge.net/ For a while the UDT API was available, developed by the Laboratory for Advanced Computing at the

I am running rsync in cygwin on windows. I am attempting to backup a somewhat large data store (750GB) to a remote site. As its windows and preserving permissions exactly is important, I have an iSCSI drive mounted on the local system across a somewhat slow WAN link (IE, it would take about 3 months to copy the datastore over it). Unfortunately, since this appears as a "local" copy to

Hi list, I can successfully build the driver modules; hdlc, dlci, syncppp, and lmc from the 2.6.18-128.1.14 kernel source rpm, and have managed to create a 'wan kmod' rpm. It all works fine for IPv4, but now I need IPv6 for ppp connections, which doesn't work for me. I think I'll need to back port Krzysztof Halasa's 'ppp for generic hdlc' patches to the

Hi, I''m implementing a linux router with this characteristics: - Multiple adsl with each public ip''s - Multiple LAN ethernets (in a bridge). - Linux IGD I have successfully implemented de 2 first steps, the adsl balanced fine (multipath routing), and the clients bridge fine. My problem is how to use that with linux-igd. My LAN bridge has STP and is implemented for

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

hello I have a asterisk server on WAN, and one server on LAN. And now there are some users on the LAN server. Users on the LAN server need to make phone calls to PSTN through the WAN server. Now on WAN server, there is a user account for the LAN server to register, and it's an account with multiple ports.(So more than one users on the LAN server can make phone calls through the WAN server at

Guus: Ok, I accept your challenge. But I am clueless in terms of getting the routing table correct. So each server has a dual identity, both a LAN private identity with a PRIVATE IP address and a WAN public identify with a PUBLIC ip address. And how to have 2 different tun devices show up in the ifconfig -a so that LAN IP address can be assigned to the tun0 and a WAN IP address can be assigned

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:29:16PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip > addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN > addresses are unique. > > But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the > 10.99.0.11 address. That should not be a problem for tinc. As long as both

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

Hello, In project, a customer has two WAN access. More precisely: Internet ----- <ISP1> --- Router1 ----<LAN1>--- FortiGate Firewall Router ------<LAN> ---- Asterisk | | -------------<ISP2> --- Router2 ----<LAN2>------------------ Both WAN access offer Gigabit-like performance and each

Hi All Is it possible to control incoming traffic from the Internet across the WAN on the company premises side not at the ISP. i.e. If I have a 128Kbps WAN and some one is trying to send me a 5MB email is possible to throttle him back to 64Kbps. Or do u have to have a box @ the ISP which limits traffic down my WAN. Thanks in Advance Steven

Gus: I guess my primary point of confusion is that the non-vpn LAN ip addresses are duplicated in each cluster. So within a cluster, the LAN addresses are unique. But when you look at 2 clusters, 2 different servers share the 10.99.0.11 address. So that is why I created a VPN for inside the cluster on the LAN interfaces using the private 10.0.1.xx range. THen, I created a separate VPN on the

Brevard County is about 70 miles long and 20 miles wide. We have many small sites around the County that will eventually have their current servers replaced with Linux/Samba servers. We've been successfully running a test Samba server since January and I'm convinced of it's stability and usefulness ... good work Samba Team and Linux in general. Other than for the test Samba server,

<P>Hi list,<BR><BR>is it possible to create something like a ISDN-WAN-WAN-ISDN bridge?<BR></P> <P>We have to change our location, but our number and the telephone system should shoulb stay the same.</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>kind regards,<BR>Patrick Stuckenberger</P>

Hello ! sorry for english, but, just don't understand why glusterfs is not destinated to be used over the wan ? I think that if the files are tiny, there's no problem to use this solution over wan.. ? But okay, if file are large.. (don't know .. 100MB - 200MB and more.) i understand that it depend of the internet connection and that's the replication can be so soo soo slow..

Colleagues- I am working on the design of a fairly large samba deployment, and I am looking for feedback on some of my design ideas. I have 10 buildings spread out in and around a city, all interconnected via 1.5Mb leased lines. There are samba servers in each building. I have some users that move from building to building. We are using primarily windows 98 desktops, with a few 2K and XPP

Arch = x86_64 OS = CentOS-6.4 (centos) with all updates applied to date. On our gateway host eth0 is the WAN access and eth1 is the LAN. I wish to activate the address 192.185.71.1 on eth1. The ifcfg-eth1:192071 file contains this: NAME="" BOOTPROTO=none MACADDR="" IPV6INIT=no DEVICE=eth1:192071 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 MTU="" BROADCAST=192.168.71.255 ONPARENT=no

hi, I'm going to be setting up Samba with a WAN and VPN. On one end of the network (my end) it will be Samba on a Linux box and some NT and 98 PCs. On the other end of the WAN it will be Windows only. I'd like to know if we need to be able to route anything other than TCP packages. Like NetBIOS or something else Windows may use. Thanks, J.

Hello all, Sorry if this is not new for you, certainly it is for me. I've setup Samba 2.2.3a on Redhat 7.3, right off the distribution's RPMs. Somehow I managed to get it working, as seen from the local LAN where the server sits, at building A. Problem is, all of my users are in building B, 10 miles across the city from the server room. This is a corporate environment, mainly Windows and