similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5637] New: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5637] New: Match case issue on ext3fs and ARM platform"

2003 Jan 16
1
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies?
Didn't hear back from anyone regarding if there is a way to determine if I am running the ext3fs with htree. Is there a way I can do it without checking the src code since I am running the precompired redhat kernel with 8.0? Perhaps an entry under /proc somewhere? Pj -----Original Message----- From: Parker Johnson Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:34 PM To: 'Andreas Dilger';
2003 Jan 16
0
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director
I'm NOT the authority here, but AFAIK, Htree is presently available only as a patch for 2.4 kernels (which includes RH8). I think that Htree was still beta code at the time RH8 was frozen (and may still be, from RedHat's perspective). I do not have the impression that the Htree patch has been applied in any standard RedHat kernels or kernel updates. I hope I am wrong, and that
2003 Jan 14
0
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies?
Andreas was kind enough to point out that not neccesarily all ext3fs have htrees ready to go. I am running redhat8.0 out of the box. How can I check if ext3fs with htrees is running? I can download the kernel source, but I don't know what options were used when it was built by redhat. Thanks much for all of your help. -Parker -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Dilger
2001 Dec 30
1
Ext3fs performance/kjournald deadlock issue
Hi, I've got a Redhat 7.2 system: Celeron 400 512MB RAM 18GB SCSI HD (/boot (ext2fs), / (ext3fs)) 40GB IDE HD (/ (ext3fs)) I run a bunch of services on the box (apache + mod_perl, MYSQL, Samba, etc) but the system is not under heavy load. This system has performance issues reading/writing to the ext3fs filesystems. The performance issues cropped up when I installed Redhat 7.2. Previously
2003 Mar 27
2
So, what about stable quota support in ext3fs?
Good evening. We have some heavy-loaded servers on ext2, and we want to migrate to ext3fs. But we need full and stable quota support. I have headrd that there are some problems in quota usage under ext3fs. Is it true? Should we decline the ext3 usage as impossible in our servers? We need high-level stability in our server (hosting). Thanks before. -- Best regards,
2001 Aug 07
1
ext3fs for 2.4.5
Hi, I have ext3 installed against the 2.2.19 kernel. I am able to make the ext3 file system and mount it. I am not able to install the ext3fs for kernel-2.4.5 . I am unable to add the ext3 patch to the kernel. In the directory ~andrewm/linux/ext3/, which is the patch for 2.4.5 kernel. ( I can only see the patches for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7 ). Also, is there any prescribed pattern for
2003 Jan 16
1
RE: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies?
Bummer. Does anyone have a url that describes the 2.4 patching process? Any claims on stability? Thanks, Parker -----Original Message----- From: 'Andreas Dilger' [mailto:adilger@clusterfs.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:35 PM To: Parker Johnson Cc: 'ext3-users@redhat.com'; Ops Subject: Re: ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in director ies? On Jan 15,
2003 Mar 21
4
Ext3fs/ReiserFS Performance Enhancing
Hello All, I have been doing some research to find a method to increase the performance of writes to the hard drives in my servers. I am running Samba and all writes to the server hard drives are taking at least 3 to 10 times (It varies) the amount of time it took to write such files on our older Windows NT 4.0 File Server. The following information is provided to keep this issue on track...
2003 Jan 14
3
ext3fs still uses sequential search of file names in directories?
I am trying to determine the optimal filesystem for accessing large numbers of files (25,000+) in a single directory. I have read that ext3fs uses a sequential search algorithm and wanted to verify that this was still indeed the case since this article was published a year ago. http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154 <http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154&nIdPage=7>
2001 Nov 27
1
ext3fs patch for 2.4.16 kernel?
This maybe early, but is there an ext3fs patch for the 2.4.16 kernel -- also, in general where does one download the lastest ext3fs patches?? I found the 2.4.14 patch a few weeks ago on in the linux.org UK site, but all the patches appear to be taken off that site...Any help would be most appreciated... Thanks, Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 Apr 09
1
simple ext3fs question.
Does redhat 9 come with htree optimizations for ext3fs?
2001 Jul 26
1
ext3fs for kernel 2.4.2?
Hello, does anybody know if there is an ext3fs patch for kernel 2.4.2-2 that is shipped with redhat 7.1? I was abel to fins patches only for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7. Please try to help ASAP. Best regards, Imad Ossaily.
2006 Aug 30
2
Partitioning for ext3fs
I have an existing hard drive that I would like to partition for ext3fs then utilize for backing up data files from a new machine. My problem is that this HDD has a full version of FC4, and if I have it switched on when connected by external USB when booting the new system, it will hang the process. New equipment is SATA with recent version of FC5; No problem when running by itself. I just
2009 Jul 17
0
Rsync problem : stops unexpectedly
Hello. My problem is Rsync stops when I use it between 2 of my servers (2 NAS Synology) ( named "*.22*" and "*.6*" ). The problem continue... For example : _ Rsync run correctly between my server "*.22*" and ".6" ( in the 2 directions ) _ Rsync run correctly between my server ".6" and "*.8*" ( in the 2 directions ) _ Rsync *doesn't
2009 Jul 15
0
Rsync stops in the middle of a transfer
Hello. My problem is Rsync stops when I use it between 2 of my servers (2 NAS Synology) ( named "*.22*" and "*.6*" ). For example : _ Rsync run correctly between my server "*.22*" and ".6" ( in the 2 directions ) _ Rsync run correctly between my server ".6" and "*.8*" ( in the 2 directions ) _ Rsync *doesn't run* correctly between my
2009 Aug 03
0
[PATCH node-image] Fix edit-livecd to re-create ext2 filesystem each time
Old edit-livecd just kept adding to the ext2 fs image which meant it never decreased in size even if files were removed. New functionality does multiple passes of ext2fs creation. First pass creates a new ext2fs from the image file inside the squashfs. This first pass is to allow the user to optionally increase the filesystem size. If the -s parameter is omitted the existing size is used and
2015 Feb 02
0
[PATCH 7/7] customize: add copy-in operation (RHBZ#1135585).
Add the copy-in operation to virt-customize/builder/sysprep, so it is possible to easily copy directories at once in the guest. --- builder/cmdline.ml | 2 +- customize/customize_run.ml | 4 ++++ generator/customize.ml | 13 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/builder/cmdline.ml b/builder/cmdline.ml index 1c6ab98..9dad141 100644 ---
2004 Aug 30
1
User Auth problems
Hi ! Problem: Auth doesn't work, can't figure out why :( More precisely: setup: dovecot 0.99.10.9 pop3 only Userdb + Passwd via passwd-file. Anything plaintext. (communication client server, passwords in passwd-file, well, for first tests non public server... if I get it working, I'll try better ways - of course) non standard parts of my config: protocols = pop3 ssl_disable = yes
2015 Sep 29
2
[PATCH 1/2] copy-in: print tar stderr when it fails
Get also the fd for the tar subprocess, and drain and print its content if the tar invocation fails. --- src/copy-in-out.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/copy-in-out.c b/src/copy-in-out.c index dc9e7b7..0dd8cd3 100644 --- a/src/copy-in-out.c +++ b/src/copy-in-out.c @@ -34,17 +34,19 @@ #include
2002 Mar 01
1
How stable is ext3fs?
Hi, I'm trying to figure out how stable the ex3fs currently is. I'm running Debian Woody with the 2.4.18 kernel and have already switched over most partitions to have a journal, and mounted them as ext3. This works fine since yesterday or so, and it's very nice that ext3 is so easy to handle and can be activated so painlessly :) But is it a good idea to switch my /home partition over