similar to: New feature: detect and avoid transfering renamed files

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "New feature: detect and avoid transfering renamed files"

2006 Jul 05
1
read.table() errors with tab as separator (PR#9061)
(1) read.table(), with sep="\t", identifies 13 our of 1400 records, in a file with 1400 records of 3 fields each, as having only 2 fields. This happens under version 2.3.1 for Windows as well as with R 2.3.1 for Mac OS X, and with R-devel under Mac OS X. [R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-07-03 r38478)] (2) Using read.table() with sep="\t", the first 1569
2014 Apr 17
0
[ANNOUNCE] libnftnl 1.0.1 release
Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: libnftnl 1.0.1 libnftnl is a userspace library providing a low-level netlink programming interface (API) to the in-kernel nf_tables subsystem. The library libnftnl has been previously known as libnftables. This library is currently used by the nft command line tool. This release comes with new features available in 3.14 and fixes. See
2002 Feb 13
1
WinNT4 reports "Network path not found" when accessing share over certain length
I've got a Samba 2.2.3a server up and running, and it is working great. No major problems, but one slight annoyance. There is a share setup called "testing-files". In Windows 2000, access to this share works fine (and in Win95/98 if I remember right), but in Windows NT 4, an error stating "Network path not found" is given. If I rename the share to "testfiles", it
2012 Nov 23
1
[PATCH] nictype.c32: PXELINUX module to display UNDI NIC bus type...
Applies to Syslinux 4.06. Attached, below, and available at: Repository: git://git.zytor.com/users/sha0/syslinux.git Branch: nictype - Shao Miller ----- From 2764e260e12d9769e3b699e4213b9a164e64924a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shao Miller <sha0.miller at gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:43:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] nictype.c32: PXELINUX module to display UNDI NIC bus
2015 Sep 20
1
[syslinux:master] com32/modules: Split build by architecture. Add dir.c32
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 8:33 AM, syslinux-bot for Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Commit-ID: e0ac1d2fdf7d7c58457f3796a12561cce95ca29f > Gitweb: http://www.syslinux.org/commit/e0ac1d2fdf7d7c58457f3796a12561cce95ca29f > Author: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> > AuthorDate: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 08:30:55 -0400 > Committer: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at
2010 Jul 01
2
[PATCH] ifplop.c32: Detect if PLoP USB/CD INT13h hook is enabled/disabled
New module which check if the PLoP Boot Loader already has booted a CDROM or USB drive by checking for the presence of the PLoP INT13h hook. The following assembly code (NASM) can detect the PLoP INT13h hook: mov eax,'PoLP' ; Reverse of 'PLoP' mov ebp,'DKHC' ; Reverse of 'CHKD' int 13h cmp eax,' sey' ; Reverse of 'yes ' jz
2007 Apr 28
0
libswfdec/swfdec_font.c
libswfdec/swfdec_font.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree e58f25683ddec3dd4e613d7a7b4d5ab58a27561c (from 95e6fcf07596addaa0605cc3f66e7551de57a971) Author: Benjamin Otte <otte@gnome.org> Date: Sat Apr 28 14:41:04 2007 +0200 Fix regression in font parsing code that made DefineFont not work Someone knows a simple way to create
2009 Nov 11
1
--detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b
Hi, I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b. Given the following tree: src/dir/file dest/src/dir/file I renamed src/dir to src/dir2 and ran the following command: rsync -a --detect-renamed --detect-moved --delete -b --backup-dir=bak src dest ending up with: dest/bak/src/dir/file Is it supposed to do that? I was expecting it to detect the renamed
2007 Jul 11
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 boris@folgmann.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boris@folgmann.de ------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST ------- I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated
2005 Feb 01
0
[Bug 2294] New: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2005 Feb 11
2
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 ------- I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which is really annoying). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You
2008 Nov 30
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is > incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz -> > httpd.11.gz). Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should
2014 Mar 02
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC --- I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches? Anyway, in a simple test, using
2016 Mar 06
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers' services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement > request myself, I found everything
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request > myself, I found
2016 Dec 30
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file, and uses it as a basis file. Whereas --detect-renamed looks
2017 Jan 22
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> --- Hi, I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential matches. I would have preferred to use a
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems (i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place to
2024 Apr 03
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea at zulu.ro> --- The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they are very different technologies used for different purposes. rsync is used commonly to synchronise at the *file level* between