similar to: man install procedure fix

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> And (a bit out of scope) if I get my old kernel to boot in EFI mode, >> will the driver efivars have access to the EFI variables? Or does the >> kernel need to be recompiled specially for EFI? > > Doubtful.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: > 2013/9/26, Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun at gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> And (a bit out of scope) if I get my old

I have searched for this topic on the mailing list and on Google without finding anything. Is this already a well known issue? The problem is that rsync does not preserve ext2-4 attributes (even when using the -a, -A, and -X flags). Note that these are different from extended attributes: Extended attributes are manipulated using programs such as getfattr and setfattr (on Unix-like systems),

(I think the subject is quite descriptive; however for use-cases and details see bellow after the mention of the old conversation and the patch.) Searching the mailing list about this topic yields an old conversation about this from 2008: * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022148.html * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022150.html I'll quote

2013/9/26, Ciprian Dorin Craciun <ciprian.craciun at gmail.com>: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> And (a bit out of scope) if I get my old kernel to boot in EFI mode, >>> will the driver efivars have access to the EFI variables?

Hi, I'm using Nut 2.7.2 with riello_ser and riello_usb 0.3 (upgraded from 0.2). Raspbian on Raspberry PI model 2015. The drivers work on SENTR models. But on several GPSER the behaviour is erratic: - usually, the serial driver cannot connect with the UPS. But, when left on for several days, I found that it suddenly connected on one machine... - the usb driver connects immediately, but

Hi, in a project i must degrade the voip/video, i know to do latency (tbf), but i don''t know how to create jitter. I want to do it on a router/bridge and not the generating equipment. Any have a idea, or know a piece of code that do it? Thanks Ciprian

On 04/01/2017 03:14 PM, Dan Craciun wrote: > On my Nagios monitoring system I use check_nut_plus (that in turn > calls upsc) to monitor the status (ups.status), load (ups.load), > battery charge (battery.charge) and runtime (battery.runtime). > > If these return "unknown", it means upsd is no longer monitoring the > UPS. As long as you get data, upsd is working. >

Hello, I have a problem with "out of memory", I'm trying to sync around 30mil files and i get error, the sync is on the same host but different directory, this with the 100bytes per file, give me 3G of ram. I have put 12G swap (6 partitions of 2G) and my 3G ram. Last i saw the process rsync get to 2100M of SIZE and 1.8G RSS, don't know exactly at how much it gets till he

Hi all heve been trying (in vain) to get a Solaris b44 DomU (dowloaded from Sun) running on a Linux Xenhost I followed exactly how, and it looked ok when it starts booting... But it never boots . adapted the configfile to boot with -v (that I can see at least something) and this is what I get ===SNIP=== root@Xen-VT02:/export/xc/xvm/solaris-b44# xm create solaris-b44-64.py -c Using config

1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13 [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c

Hello, Besides a very good functionality, I have a small, yet stressing, problem. Let''s say I have a bandwidth of N bits. I have X clients, everyone with his fixed bandwidth. I create htb qdsics for each client. Each leaf has sfq queueing discipline. A sample config would be like this : tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:346 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 32Kbit burst 4k

I am trying to upgrade our fully functional Samba domain from v3.0.2 to v3.0.7 or v3.0.8. My question is, do I have to upgrade every server in the domain in order for it to work or should I be able to upgrade one server at a time, test it, and move on to the next server? Or should I upgrade the domain controller first, then upgrade the member servers one at a time? I've tried to upgrade

Hi, > On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 01:32:15PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: >> I have a grown list of IPs that I am "deny ip from ###.### to any". Infected machines, hackers, etc.. >> >> Is there a way to have this list outside of rc.firewall and just read it in? > from man ipfw LOOKUP TABLES Lookup tables are useful to handle large sparse address sets, typically

Hi there, Is there some way to configure ipfw to do traffic normalizing ("scrubbing", as in ipf for OpenBSD)? Is there any tool to do it for FreeBSD firewalling? I've heard that ipf was ported on current, anything else? TIA, /Dorin. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools

>> 3. I'm intrested in blocking kazaa/P2P trafic with IPFW any help in this issue you could possibly block connections at known p2p ports. deny tcp from any to any 6699 step but most of the newer protocols use dynamic ports and in turn, are configurable. so ipfw isn't exactly ideal on it's own for this. -r. -----Original Message----- From: Pons [mailto:pons@gmx.li] Sent:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

Hi there, Is the gpg FreeBSD port vulnerable to ElGamal signing key disclosure problem? Info: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2003q4/000276.html Thank you, /Dorin. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Summary: Potential Buffer Overruns in Samba 3.0 and Samba 2.2 CVE ID: CAN-2004-0600, CAN-2004-0686 ~ (http://cve.mitre.org/) - ------------- CAN-2004-0600 - ------------- Affected Versions: >= v3.0.2 The internal routine used by the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT v3.0.2 and later) to decode the base64 data

i''ve installed mrtg to make graphics of the trafic from the interfece throw the snmpd, and the same with ipac witch put iptables accounting rules colect them and store, and gets the output, but the "problem" is that ipac graphics are 3 times smaller that the snmpd. Why??? i did catch all the trafic with ipac so no problem here, and i know that ipac/iptables is at level 3, and