Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "bad error message? .. main.c code 23 .. caused by sgid on dir"
2005 Oct 11
5
scp bug: newly created dirs do not inherit sgid bit
Dear developers,
I discovered that directories created by scp when recursive
copying into a sgid directory do not inherit the sgid bit. I believe
this is a bug. A patch to fix this is attached.
Regards,
Petr Skovron
-------------- next part --------------
--- scp.c.orig 2005-10-11 16:50:17.000000000 +0200
+++ scp.c 2005-10-11 16:57:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -876,8 +876,12 @@
2002 Oct 24
1
rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(578)
Hi,
I am using a freebsd 4.5-stable system. I am using the latest "rsync
version 2.5.5 protocol version 26".
I tried to rsync my home directory to another machine:
rsync -Cavz /homes/yxw/ baggie.mit.edu:/disk1/ &> rsync.out&
However, I ran into the error:
www/wf-02.jpg
www/wf-03.jpg
www/www.c
www/www.tar
www/xiaowei.doc
www/xiaowei_dadmom.jpg
www/yxw-contact.txt
wrote
2008 Dec 22
1
sgid bit set on ordinary files mounted via smbfs
Hi, I find that files (not directories) in an smbfs-mounted share always
have the sgid bit set. I've looked in the FAQ and HOWTO but didn't see
anything. I wonder if someone might suggest a way to fix it.
The share is served from Windows 2003 SP2 and mounted on a Fedora 10 Linux
machine (samba-client-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.i386) with this command line:
mount //wcl-fp1/shared /mnt/shared -t
2000 Aug 02
1
SGID bit in Samba 2.0.7
Hello,
we use the SGID bit on Solaris for directories to force setting
the given group from the directories above (not the primary group).
If we create directories with Samba 2.0.7, the SGID bit will not set
on the new directory. With Samba 2.0.6 and below all worked fine.
Is there a work around or a bug fix available?
Thx
Sincerly yours
Jochen Duemmel
PS: we use Samba for a server
2017 Jun 19
1
Bit SGID on directories
Hello,
I have a samba server v4.6.5, it’s a member of a Windows 2003 domain.
I setup a share, in this share I want to set sgid bit on directories.
I created a directory with SGID bit on the top of the share, but when I create inside new directories didn’t have SGID bits.
Here is my smb.conf :
[global]
use sendfile = no
gpfs:getrealfilename = no
smb ports = 445 139
dos charset =
1997 May 29
1
Vulnerability of suid/sgid programs using libXt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Buffer overflow in the resource handling code of the libXt (X11R6)
Thu May 29, 1997
Distribution of this document is unlimited
Copyright (C) Alexander O. Yuriev (alex@yuriev.com)
Net Access
Abstract
A buffer overflow was found in the resource handling
2010 Jul 09
2
difference between stickybit SUID and SGID
i had a small query , whant is the difference between stickybit SUID and
SGID , is there any proper site where i can get a clear understanding .
--
Regards
Agnello D'souza
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100709/c7c22588/attachment.html>
2016 May 18
0
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote:
> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like:
>
> drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 .
if you notice, there is a '+' at the end
2016 May 18
0
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
On 18/05/16 21:18, Smith, Jarrod A wrote:
>> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote:
>>> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like:
drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 .
It's owned by user "myapp" and GID 9997 and as you can see we have the SGID bit set on this
2016 May 18
2
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
> On May 18, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote:
>> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like:
>>
2013 Jan 02
0
Bug or strange behaviour or --output-prefix
Seems like what you really want is an --input-prefix parameter.
You might also like a --create-output-directories option.
In all cases except absolute paths, the input prefix must be assumed
to be the current working directory. Therefore, any relative paths in
input file names must be preserved on output to avoid collapsing
multiple source directories into a single output directory, with
2013 Dec 12
2
Size detection/replair does not work with zlib
Hi!
Usually dovecot auto detects or repairs the size of a maildir
message. So I can place a message named "foo" in the cur directory
and dovecot uses it.
Now I tried the same with a zlib compressed message but here dovecot
doesn't recognize/repair the size of the message.
When I access this folder via IMAP the connection is diconnected and
in dovecot logs I see the following
2017 Apr 26
2
tempdir() may be deleted during long-running R session
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:41:58PM +0000, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> Might this combination serve the purpose:
> * R session keeps an open handle on the tempdir it creates,
> * whatever tempdir harvesting cron job the user has be made sensitive enough not to delete open files (including open directories)
Good suggestion but doesn't work with the (increasingly popular)
2017 Apr 26
0
tempdir() may be deleted during long-running R session
>>>>> <frederik at ofb.net>
>>>>> on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:13:59 -0700 writes:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:41:58PM +0000, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
>> Might this combination serve the purpose:
>> * R session keeps an open handle on the tempdir it creates,
>> * whatever tempdir harvesting cron job the user has be made
2012 Dec 18
2
Bug or strange behaviour or --output-prefix
Hi all,
I was busy programming a tool to automatically run some tests to update
the FLAC comparison page (http://xiph.org/flac/comparison.html) when I
stumbled across some weird behaviour of the flac program. So I compiled
from git and it seems that this bug still is there. As I don't have any
experience on coding C and don't know which bug-report facility to use,
this seemed the
2004 Jun 22
1
Multiple --compare-dest args again
Hi all.
A while ago (April 15th or so) I posted a patch that allows rsync to
take multiple --compare-dest or --link-dest arguments, allowing
fetching of files not present in multiple trees. I never got any
feedback on it, though, so I'm picking it up again. :) Is there any
interest in such a patch at all?
Below is the usage example i outlined back then;
--start--
[...] Its primary usage is
2011 Apr 25
2
Samba can't access dir - SELinux problem?
Hello,
I was using CentOS 5.5 as a "playground" VM at my WinXP notebook
and now I'm migrating to a new CentOS 5.6 install
and everything has worked well - except samba.
I have this very permissive config to export my ~/src dir:
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
guest ok = yes
guest account = afarber
security = share
hosts allow = 172.16.6. 127.0.0.1
[src]
2002 Dec 22
1
weird stat()
hei everyone,
I have a weird problem: if I do a
# cd /somedir; stat somesubdir |grep Modify
where /somedir is some directory on an SMB-mounted filesystem I get one
datetime... but I I do:
# cd /somedir; stat * |grep Modify
for the same directory I get a Modify time which consistently differs by 1
second. As I'm writing a perl module to detect differences in a filesystem
and rely on the
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share -
xcopy /d /e c:\somedir w:\somedir
xcopy /d /e w:\somedir c:\somedir
This should have the behavior of making the two directory
structures identical, with newer files on one overwriting older
or missing files on the other.
This only behaves as expected for about half the files. For some
files, Windows always wants to re-copy files to the Samba share.
I have looked at the files it wants to