similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5457] New: Add a client-side --munge-symlinks option

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5457] New: Add a client-side --munge-symlinks option"

2006 Nov 28
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4263] New: Symlinks gets corruped when rsyncd is used to 'put' the symlink.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4263 Summary: Symlinks gets corruped when rsyncd is used to 'put' the symlink. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2012 Apr 09
0
Puppet Error - Munge - Conf File
Hello, I''ve been using puppet fairly successfully on a 10 server cluster, so I thought I had a decent idea of what I was doing. However, we''re starting a new project using a different virtualization system ( XenServer ), and I can''t seem to get puppet to accept my previous conf file. The error is a strange one to me: [root@centos6-exp2 ~]# puppet agent --test
2015 Feb 19
0
Anyone using torque/pbs/munge?
CentOS 6.6 I've got two servers, server1 and hbs (honkin' big server). Both are running munge, and torque... *separately*. My problem is that I've got users who want to be able to submit from server1 to hbs. I see that munged can be pointed to an alternate keyfile... but is there any way to tell qsub what to use? (And yes, I got on the torque users' list, and I'm trying
2007 Nov 27
1
Rsync-daemon security advisories for writable daemons
There are two security advisories for people who run a writable rsync daemon. One affects only those with "use chroot = no" (which is not a very safe combination in general), and one affects a daemon that has daemon-excluded files that are being hidden in a module's hierarchy. Included are simple config-change suggestions that should help you to avoid the security issues. These
2007 Nov 27
1
Rsync-daemon security advisories for writable daemons
There are two security advisories for people who run a writable rsync daemon. One affects only those with "use chroot = no" (which is not a very safe combination in general), and one affects a daemon that has daemon-excluded files that are being hidden in a module's hierarchy. Included are simple config-change suggestions that should help you to avoid the security issues. These
2009 Feb 14
0
Cannot copy symlinks: rsync: open(...) failed!!: No such file or directory (2)
Hi, I can't figure out how to backup a tree with symlinks. I either get errors like rsync: open(rc2.d/S20inetd) failed!!: No such file or directory (2) or (with --safe-link on the client and "munge symlinks = yes" on the server): ignoring unsafe symlink "/etc/rc2.d/S20inetd" (in backups) -> "/rsyncd-munged/../init.d/inetd" What I am trying to do is
2018 Apr 04
0
[Bug 13364] rsyncd clips trims relative symlinks outside of source tree
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364 --- Comment #3 from Chris Severance <samba.severach at spamgourmet.com> --- >enable munge-symlinks. That way the client will get back the same out-of-tree symlink as it started with This is a lousy option for backups. The only way to get my original links back is to pull the restore through rsync. Restoring directly from the rsyncd server
2018 Apr 02
5
[Bug 13364] New: rsyncd clips trims relative symlinks outside of source tree
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13364 Bug ID: 13364 Summary: rsyncd clips trims relative symlinks outside of source tree Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:
2013 Feb 02
0
patches in distros - include upstream ?
Hello, i have found, that major distros (especially opensuse) ship their rsync packages with a lot of patches which i don`t find in the official rsync-patches git. Maybe there is a reason for that or i missed something or looked wrong, but for convenience/transparency i have compiled a list of those and ask if it would make sense to put them into the official rsync patches git, as most of them
2010 Feb 08
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7108] New: --fake-super should be nestable
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7108 Summary: --fake-super should be nestable Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: matt at mattmccutchen.net
2008 Sep 23
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5789] New: rsync trying to set times on symlinks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5789 Summary: rsync trying to set times on symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: paredes@aecom.yu.edu
2008 May 06
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5442] New: setting times to symlinks which do not point to existing files causes error reports
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5442 Summary: setting times to symlinks which do not point to existing files causes error reports Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2006 Aug 20
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4037] New: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037 Summary: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2009 Jan 13
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6027] New: Error when rsync encounters empty symlinks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 Summary: Error when rsync encounters empty symlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: kai@kaishome.de
2008 May 24
1
3.02 bug? Symlink ->foo changed to ->/rsyncd-munged/foo
On Mac OS X 10.5.2 I run rsync to keep a couple of instances of my / usr/local tree in sync. With Apple's rsync I run (e.g.): sudo /usr/bin/rsync --rsync-path=/usr/bin/rsync -E --progress -avu -- delete --dry-run --exclude=TeXLive-working-copy/ --exclude=context- update/ --exclude=.Spotlight-V100/ --exclude=.fseventsd/ \ -e "ssh -i /Users/gerben/.ssh/id_rsync -l root" \
2008 Mar 05
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5304] New: failed to set times (symlinks)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5304 Summary: failed to set times (symlinks) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: gmoreno@wlu.ca QAContact:
2009 Nov 25
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6927] New: Add a --fat option to ignore 1-second time diffs, ownership, hard links, symlinks, etc.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6927 Summary: Add a --fat option to ignore 1-second time diffs, ownership, hard links, symlinks, etc. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2010 Feb 08
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7110] New: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110 Summary: Symlink fake-super data is silently lost when sys_lsetxattr fails with EPERM Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at
2009 Mar 19
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6197] New: Perms/owner/group modifiers for "show" filters
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6197 Summary: Perms/owner/group modifiers for "show" filters Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2008 Mar 06
2
server-side AND client-side symlinks?
How can I have both server-side and client-side symlinks? Server-side symlinks are needed for example when what appears to the user to be a single mounted directory is actually tens of little pieces tied together by symlinks. Having those symlinks coalesces many mounts that would all have to be perfect in parallel into a single mount that's either fully successful or not. Client-side