Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5440] New: 'relative' test fails on SunOs 5.8"
2009 Apr 11
0
sudo make check fails on OSX
Since snapshot rsync-HEAD-20090220-0710GMT.tar.gz
make check is successful but sudo make check fails
------------------------------------------------------------
----- overall results:
29 passed
3 failed
6 skipped
------------------------------------------------------------
failed
FAIL batch-mode
FAIL chmod-option
FAIL daemon-gzip-upload
2007 Nov 02
0
build/test problems with rsync-3.0.0pre4
Hi,
I tried to build rsync-3.0.0pre4 on a list of different plattforms
and got some problems with build or test suite.
first, the good news: the build and tests worked fine on these plattforms
Solaris 5.5.1, 5.6 and 5.8 (sparc) and 5.10 (x86 and sparc)
SUSE Linux 9.0 (amd64), 10.1 (amd6) SLES10 (32 and 64 bit)
RedHat 7.1 and 9.0 (32 bit)
RedHat EL3 (ia64)
problems
2003 Feb 22
1
rsync ported to BeOS-bone
Hello, here is a preliminary patch allowing rsync 2.5.6
to compile in BeOS (using the new BONE networking stack).
Some explanations:
- BeOS doesn't have chroot(),
- the BONE networking stack export legacy network function
for old apps in libnet.so (linked to by default), so it's
necessary to force linking to the new libraries for things
to work. I've yet to get inet_ntop() to be
2005 Jul 28
2
test failed with acl patch
In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the
patches directory.
I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with
this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ?
Thanks by advance.
Following the message (a bit long):
----- itemize log follows
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
+
2008 Mar 02
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5297] New: merge test fails
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
Summary: merge test fails
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
QAContact:
2008 Mar 03
0
3.0.1 Test Success MacOS X 10.4.11
I have also been eager to test bbouncer
The latest source passes with flying colours!
but make check finds some problems with xattrs if not run by sudo
I have xattr in /usr/local/bin/ from the source found at:
http://dev.bignerdranch.com/public/bnr/eXttra.zip
What I did:
cd /usr/local/Source
rsync -av --exclude=.git/ rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/unpacked/rsync .
rsync -av --exclude=.git/
2014 Dec 30
2
Modification time error
I was struggling tracking down a strange behaviour and could reproduce it
with the testsuite. After patching it with:
--- a/testsuite/compare-dest.test 2007-09-03 22:43:58.000000000 +0200
+++ b/testsuite/compare-dest.test 2014-12-30 19:28:32.060267390 +0100
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
# Setup the alt and chk dirs
$RSYNC -av --include=text --include='*/' --exclude='*'
2007 Jul 11
1
"Exclude" test fails on OS X (i386 Darwin 8.10.1)
Version 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30.PR4
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, no ACLs, xattrs, iconv
The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1
RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C. The same test passes on
the G4 PPC Darwin 8.10.0, and on i686 Xeon
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-3.0.2 fails testsuite in itemize
HI,
rsync-3.0.2 with patches/acls.diff,patches/xattrs.diff,patches/slp.diff
fails (most of the time) in the itemize test:
----- itemize log follows
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/foo
makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/bar/baz
cd+++++++++ ./
cd+++++++++ bar/
2010 Sep 07
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7667] New: "devices" regression test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7667
Summary: "devices" regression test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2008 Jun 02
2
rsync-3.0.2 -- two build problems
Hi,
when I tried to build rsync-3.0.2 on i686-linux/gnu, I noticed 2 problems:
====================
(1) With the Linux kernel >=2.6.20, "make check" occasionally fails, due to
subsecond timestamps sometimes being truncated and sometimes being rounded
upwards (both on i686 and x86_64).
Attached are two files demonstrating the problem: rsync-3.0.2-check-out with
the relevant output
2001 Oct 13
0
NOLF
you need to update your NOLF to ver 3 by getting the patch, then goto
gamecopyworld.com to get the fixed exe, then wine Nolf.exe and you get as
far as I, I get a splash screen but when I click launch it says "No game
resources specified" and dies..... respond to this if you read it just so
I know your alive, maybe we can get it running?
In article
2011 Mar 17
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r2940 - in branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org>
> To: nut-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:57:09 +0000
> Subject: svn commit r2940 - in
> branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer: . ImageFiles
> ImageFiles/Binary ImageFiles/Others ImageFiles/emptyDir
>
2009 Jul 07
0
rsync-3.0.6 regression test problems
Hi,
I've build rsync-3.0.6 on a number of legacy unix systems, and on a few
systems the regression tests showed up with some errors:
HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23 (ia64):
FAIL chown
FAIL dir-sgid
FAIL fuzzy
FAIL itemize
IRIX 6.5.13m:
FAIL chown
FAIL fuzzy
FAIL itemize
MacOS-X 10.4:
FAIL chgrp
the errors on "fuzzy" and "itemize" are
2002 Mar 28
1
rsync-2.5.5rc1: two problems on Apple Darwin (== MacOS X)
There is a small configure glitch for rsync-2.5.5rc1 on Apple Darwin
(== MacOS X) [
uname -a
Darwin darwin.math.utah.edu 5.2 Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001; root:xnu/xnu-201.14.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
] the config.h file gets the line
#define INET6 1
The link then fails with
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_freehostent
_getipnodebyaddr
2017 Sep 20
6
[Bug 13044] New: On macOS 10.12.6 with the new Xcode 9, `make check` is full of failures
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13044
Bug ID: 13044
Summary: On macOS 10.12.6 with the new Xcode 9, `make check` is
full of failures
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x86
OS: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P5
Component: core
2004 Sep 23
1
rsync script from homepage: trouble
Hello,
I'm new to this and am trying to modify the "backup to a central backup
server with 7 day incremental" script from
http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/examples.html to suit my situation.
I have ended up with the script attached below and when running it from
command line I get these errors:
rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(726)
and a plethora of this
>
2002 Jun 26
5
[PATCH] improved chroot handling
There are a couple of niggles with the sandboxing of the unprivileged
child in the privsep code: the empty directory causes namespace pollution,
and it requires care to ensure that it is set up properly and remains set
up properly. The patch below (against the portable OpenSSH, although the
patch against the OpenBSD version is very similar) replaces the fixed
empty directory with one that is
2006 Dec 15
2
BugReport: rsync fails it's own "regression" test "chmod-option"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Recent versions of rsync have a "regression test" called
"chmod-option" that when run fails, this should be causing rsync to be
rejected as broken by all distros and sysadmins.
A bit of research show that no one has mentioned this test since it
was last worked on in late September, nor does it show up as a current
bug
2005 Nov 23
2
HELP: need better understanding of "--delete" flag
Need to understand exactly what the "--delete" flag
does when rsync runs.
Here is my understanding... If a file is created on
the source machine on monday, then rsync'd to the
rsync server on monday night, then deleted on the
source machine tuesday, then it will be deleted from
the rsync server on tuesday night when the cron job
runs again.
But, would rsync under any circumstances,