similar to: rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion

Hi Wayne, I just got this bug report about rsync 3.0.2 reproducibly crashing, together with a backtrace and a patch; very helpful :-) (Please preserve 477931-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC so that you response is archived in the Debian BTS, thanks.) Paul Slootman On Fri 25 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Subject: Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive. > From:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8979 Summary: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at

Hi :) Was just wondering whether someone could help me with adjustments to trellis plots (parallel). I've got two way multivariate data. I want to make parallel plots for one of the factors, and want to color the lines according to the other factor. The first thing I manage, but with the other I'm lost :( Can only change the overall color. This is basically how far I get:

rsyncing a tree of perhaps 30M files, getting this: rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. then a bit more output and

How about this. Its not as 'swish' as Doug's response, but it might be a little simpler to think about and adapt... # show the test vector > tmp [1] A B C B C A C B A A B Levels: A B C > # create a named vector to store the number of occurences of each level > index <- numeric(length=length(levels(tmp))) > names(index) <- levels(tmp) > index A B C [1] 0 0

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4357 Summary: Missing bounds checking in send_files could lead crash Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hi, http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8453 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8371 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3227 I came across the above by accident. While I am subscribed to the so called rails security list where supposed announcement of security issues were to be posted, neither of the above problem made the list. While I use rails a lot and like it, the above

I've been using 3.0.0pre8 to move a Debian archive from one filesystem to another. This archive contains a daily snapshot of the Debian ftp site, with common files hardlinked to save space. I noticed that it was using far more space than necessary. Upon investigation it seems that all the source files that have inode numbers greater than 2^31 aren't being hardlinked together at the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542 Summary: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1445 Bug ID: 1445 Summary: conntrackd: segfaults when not disabling internal cache Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666 Summary: --debug=all9 fail Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact: rsync-qa at

Ok I found a bug about this: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542 and it says fixed by upgrade. I found a way to upgrade. Using: rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31 on receiving side that issues the rsync command, and rsync version 3.1.1 protocol version 31 on the remote sending side. Im still getting the same thing: rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >=

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Iain Lee <menelaus at spartica.net> wrote: > Paul, > > Thanks your contribution, I too miss gnumeric. However, I get these errors > and the installed gnumeric crashes on opening a gnumeric file: > > ============================================================================= > Package Arch Version

Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: snapshot OS: Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.218) Time to kick phyper's tires... The current version has very serious cancellation issues. For example, if you ask for a small right-tail you are likely to get total cancellation. For example phyper(59, 150, 150, 60, FALSE, FALSE) gives 6.372680161e-14. The right answer is dhyper(0, 150, 150, 60,

Hi, I trying installing a Samba 3.0.1pre domain controller with ACL support. It works fine but i've got strange behaviour managing the file permissions access control list on Windows machines. When I add a domain group or a domain user to the user list of a local file, it is correctly shown. But, when I close and reopen the window, the username (SERVER\username) is no longer shown, but

Hi, I have Samba 2.2.3a running on a FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE system and a Windows 2000 Pro laptop. I am trying to use the offline files feature in windows to keep offline copies of some documents but it doesn't appear to play nicely with Samba :( I setup some documents to sync and it appears to copy them over, and says it was successful, but after I go offline they are 0 bytes long and in the

is it possible to have a samba daemon call an executable script each time a file within one of it shares is modified or a new file is created? I'm looking to develop a file catalogging system for my file server which depends on my software being notified each time a file is modified or a new file created. This allows the modified/new file to be scanned for relavent information. :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear List, Few days ago I've posted, that my Win9x boxes are unable to get the list of domain users and groups from samba-3.0.0 server (for details see bug 596). Unfortunately the same is true for samba-3.0.1pre1. Please people also having win9x boxes and Samba3 PDC confirm that it is a bug, or a configuration error. Thanks for any suggestion.

I have installed the Samba 3.0.0 as PDC. If number of users is small (about 15) it works fine, but when it grows and the whole list of users or groups doesn't fit in one RPC buffer, Win98 "servers" can't get it and unable to set user level security. User manager for domains from NT server can get and modify the users. Is this bug or bad config? -- WBR, Nick. PS. Please,

--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message --- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:48:13 +0100 (MET) From: "Thomas Bork" <knuffelmail@gmx.de> To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Subject: Re: [Samba] fcntl lock failed at large offset: pretty urgent Hi Jeremy, > > More info of setup: > > The version of Samba I have is a precompiled Debian package, and > >