similar to: Rsync failures when things are going too fast ?

dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > Thank you. I will try your suggestions. First I will connect the NAS Ah, you didn't mention NAS ! How is it connected to the computer hosting "A" ? If via network then you've added *another* layer. > directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then

Thank you. I will try your suggestions. First I will connect the NAS directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then it would look like this: Computer <--FW800--> HD <--USB2--> NAS The other option is HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS But I still must say it is weird that

Hi all, Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes. The logs say; cannot find hfs+ superblock and volumes larger then 2TB are not supported yet Is my case really because of the >2TB volume? Thanks in advance, - aurf

Den 2016-01-26 kl. 09:06, skrev Simon Hobson: >>> >>The other option is >>> >> >>> >>HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS >> > >> >If you use a network connection then you've still got that network layer. > Just thinking a bit more about that ... > > Is your normal setup : >

Hi there, I'm using this version of rsync: localhost:~ mzehetle$ /usr/local/bin/rsync --version rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others HFS+ filesystem support for OSX (C)2004 Kevin A. Boyd <http://rsync.samba.org/> Basically incremental backup (--link-dest option) works with a destination on my local volume but not with a

̨Íåºê´ó¹ú¼ÊÉÌó¹«Ë¾³ÏÑ°¹óµØºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬ÏúÊÛµçÄÔ¡¢Åä¼þ¡¢ÊÖ»ú¡¢±Ê¼Ç±¾µçÄÔ¡££¨²Î¿¼¼Û¸ñ±íÈçÏ£© ÎÒ˾±£Ö¤²úƷΪȫÐÂÔ­×°,»õµ½¸¶¿î¡£Óв»Ïê¿ÉÀ´ÈËÀ´µç×Éѯ£º ÁªÏµÈË:³ÂÊÀ½Ü µç»°:013850704389 Ò»¡¢Ä¦ÍÐÂÞÀ­ µ¥Î»/Ôª T189--400 T190--350 T191--500 C289--550 T2988--350 A388--1600 A6288--1300 V70--2000 V8088--800 V998++ --700 V60+ --1200 V66+GPRS--950 ŵ»ùÑÇ 3310--400 3330--450

dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > It is exactly as I wrote. On a network volume (A) a "sparse disk image bundle" (B), i.e., a type of disk image used in OS X, is stored. B is then mounted locally (i.e., local to where rsync is run) on a computer (C) where it appears as one of many volumes. > > In other words, B is stored on A. A is then mounted (using

Hi, I have a 4.7-RELEASE system. I used the following cvsupfile to update my system: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_4_8 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. I then proceeded to do: cd /usr/src make buildworld I got a bunch of errors which occurred when building kdump:

# uname -a FreeBSD ck.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #1: Tue Jul 15 11:38:41 EDT 2008 ck@friendlybearonskates.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CK i386 # Make buildkernel kernconf=CK fails here : linking kernel.debug sbp.o(.text+0xd9d): In function `sbp_free_ocb': /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c:2905: undefined reference to `xpt_release_devq' sbp.o(.text+0x123e): In function

Hello, looking into the issue described in the advisory below I wonder how to tackle this issues. Primarily I ask myself * is there any reason not to filter all physical memory access by default * what would be the appropriate way to change the filter set? a sysctl? Regards Maximillian Dornseif FireWire/IEEE 1394 direct memory access - CAN-2004-1038 Advisory URL:

I am being given a digital camcorder. It uses Mini DV tapes and either connects via typical RCA cables (IE to a tv) or via FireWire. I don't have the brand on hand, but I was told it can be ripped to DV like any standard FireWire camcorder (I believe dvgrab will be sufficient). I just installed an older FireWire card I have that I used at one point in Fedora for my iPod. It was a PITA

I have a problem with rsync on macintosh copying files that have not been updated. Despite careful reading of the archives, I can't find an explanation (or a fix), but I strongly suspect I'm just missing something that an expert will recognise instantly... Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. I'm running a nightly backup of my photo/home video directory from a partition

Hi all! I'm trying to use my first-ever firewire device, and just OOB I'm not getting very far, so advice would be appreciated. When I plug in the device I see some entries in /var/log/messages: Jul 27 14:50:30 fcshome kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc1, gap_count=5 Jul 27 14:50:31 fcshome kernel: firewire_core: created device fw1: GUID 0003f300118123f9, S100

Hi..... I just bought a External HD with USB/FireWire interfaces. I was trying to connect it by firewire and nothing happened, but it's connected by USB, there is no problem. This is the "fdisk - l" output when i connect it by USB Disco /dev/sdc: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 cabezas, 63 sectores/pista, 19457 cilindros Unidades = cilindros de 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Hello, I'm trying to implement the Oracle RAC on a firewire shared disk. I've patched the kernel (for multiple login firewire support), and both nodes can see the shared disk. Then, i've installed the files necessary for ocfs: ocfs-2.4.20-smp-1.0.8-4.i386.rpm ocfs-support-1.0.8-4.i386.rpm ocfs-tools-1.0.8-4.i386.rpm However, when i do a '/sbin/load_ocfs' this is what i get:

I got a WD 1TB My Book with eSATA/USB/Firewire400 connectivity to backup data on a client Centos 5.1 machine. USB 2.0 works fine out of the box but is rather slow, Nautilus predicts about 1+ hour to fully backup just one day's worth of data or about 100GB. So I was hoping Firewire would be faster, which is why we got the version with all 3 interfaces to experiment with first. Following the

Hi! After switching from UMS (dated 20090701+c0bf670) to KMS (as of 2010-02-01), almost any X activity causes buffer underruns on my firewire soundcard. When the X pointer changes from arrow to the vertical text selection bar, firewire streaming is interrupted. Same with scrolling in firefox or hovering over a link, thus changing the pointer to "hand". Looks like nouveau is disabling

A friend sent me an ipod to office to transfer music to it. It had a firewire cable and I have an Audigy soundcard with a firewire port. But when I connected the ipod to the firewire port, I got a lot of weird numbers and interrupt errors and the system crashed badly. Is there some problem with firewire support in the kernel? -- Roger D. Vargas http://dsgp.blogspot.com | Linux, programaci?n,

A bit more info about my system; I edited /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire and commented out the blacklist like so it looks like so; #blacklist firewire-ohci Running lspci returns; 10:0b.0 Firewire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB82AA2 IEEE-1394b Link Layer Controller (rev 02) lsmod | grep firewire returns; firewire_sbp2 50897 0 firewire_core 79305 1 firewire_sbp2 scsi_mod

The following is mostly for Nick, but perhaps there are others who might be interested in one part or another of the following... Nick, I think we're basically on the same page here. I'll first try to cover some of my basic ideas in general, then respond to your specific comments inline. For one thing, I have long believed that it is smart to keep analog audio circuits