similar to: remote starting dir failsafe ?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:05 AM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On January 19, 2016 12:24:50 PM PST, Tal Lubko <tallubko at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa at zytor.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:17 PM >>> To: Tal Lubko;

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 13d03e9daf70dab032c03dc172e75bb98ad899c4 ] Where possible, we want the failsafe link configuration (one which won't hang the OR during modeset because of not enough bandwidth for the mode) to also be supported by the sink. This prevents "link rate unsupported by sink" messages when link training fails.

I have some clients that run centos6 and I need to have users be able to access the "failsafe terminal" from the login screen. The old options (from 4/5) for choosing your session aren't present. I've googled a bit on this but don't seem to be using a good search string as most of the hits have nothing to do with this and the rest aren't helpful. So, just wondering

For the mailing list archive and for anyone else interested. A few years ago we needed to automatically run a second AGI if the first AGI failed i.e. a "failsafe" setup. Mainly because I'm not a very good programmer. 8-| The code below is very similar to what we use in production. This code is also at http://pastebin.com/LBaLhdfJ for a while. "sm" stands for Switch

I have a customer that described this issue to me in general terms. I''d like to know how to replicated it, and what the best practice is to a avoid the issue, or fix it in an accepted manner. If they kernel patch, and reboot they may get messages informing them that the pool version is down rev''d. If they act on the message and upgrade the pool version, then have to boot from

Used to, when I had an error in development mode, I saw a pretty stack trace in the browser and didn''t have to go the server console, and in production mode I would see the pretty 500.html error page be displayed. Since I''ve started using Rails 2.2, I no longer get either of these. I get the ugly black and white "500 Internal Server Error" message. The happens the

I'm admin on a samba PDC with 150 users, and as normal users they are quit "stupid". This means that they ofte deletes something that shouldnt have been deleted. And I find it anoying to restore their files from tapebackup. So would it be possible to get samba to "move" files instead of deleting them? This way I could allocate a disk to store deleted files for a periode of

I am trying to find out why form_tag with remote => true is not sending an ajax response and only sending HTML. I have started a basic Rails App with two pages and am following the Railscast 205 UJS example. Every time I include:- <%= form_tag homepages_path, :method => ''get'', remote => true do %> I get from the server(WEBrick):- (Ruby 1.9.2 and Rails 3) A 500

Hi, I''m creating the file upload code in a C# web form to upload to my Rails app. When I start the upload I get the following error on my Rails server? Any ideas how I can fault find here? It could be the case the HTTP post I''m creating has a problem (it'' multipart, with a file upload + some form parameters) however it''s hard to tell from Rails what it is

I''ve just upgraded a production web site with some new code to handle file uploads, using both the standard post technique and swfupload. This code was working perfectly in my development environment, and I''m not sure what I should ever start to look for. Here''s the stack dump: /!\ FAILSAFE /!\ Wed Feb 06 19:13:41 -0700 2008 Status: 500 Internal Server Error

On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 18:56 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > Other IR objects (like instructions) have very simple ownership. An > instruction is owned by its basic block, a bb is owned by the function, a > function is owned by thet module. If an instruction is initially allocated with its Instruction *insertAtEnd parameter defaulted to null, and then later appended to a BasicBlock,

> -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Cumm [mailto:gene.cumm at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:14 PM > To: Tal Lubko > Cc: H. Peter Anvin; For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Embedding com32 modules and ldlinux.sys into > one file > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:05 AM, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux > <syslinux at

As I stated before, I had in the work a utility to control spaces around punctuation and at some other places. Now, I've integrated it, with a few extra quote goodies, within PHP SmartyPants, as an extension just like PHP Markdown Extra extends PHP Markdown. And so appeared SmartyPants Typographer (announcement on my weblog)

This is a wierd one. Can't figure it out. I have an SPA-3000 at the house handling my incoming line. It's setup to direct the incoming call to asterisk. Works great 99% of the time. A few times a day, I'm getting calls that ring once internally and are then hungup. I managed to get a detailed log [1] of what's happening today and it looks to me that the SPA is acting wierd.

> -----Original Message----- > From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa at zytor.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 9:17 PM > To: Tal Lubko; 'Celelibi' > Cc: 'For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa' > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Embedding com32 modules and ldlinux.sys into > one file > > On 01/19/16 00:07, Tal Lubko via Syslinux wrote: > > > > To

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no smart host stuff_). I've got Sendmail 8.14 installed on a CentOS 7.3

Please forgive the cross-post; I'm not sure where this issue lies. Samba 3.5.1, CentOS 5.5 x86_64 PDC with Win2K, WinXP, Win2003 and Win7 32-bit domain members, tdbsam backend. Cygwin 1.7.7. All basic functionality seems to be fine, except... On Win2K, WinXP and Win2003, a "DIR /Q" on a mapped share always displays the owner as "BUILTIN\Administrators", but a